1 / 29

Comparative & Superlative Adjectives and Textual Frequency

Comparative & Superlative Adjectives and Textual Frequency. Laura Teddiman University of Alberta AACL – March 13, 2008. Talk Structure. Background The Current Study Methodology Results Entire BNC Breakdown by subcorpora Newspapers, Spoken Discussion & Conclusions.

oshin
Download Presentation

Comparative & Superlative Adjectives and Textual Frequency

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparative & Superlative Adjectives and Textual Frequency Laura Teddiman University of Alberta AACL – March 13, 2008

  2. Talk Structure • Background • The Current Study • Methodology • Results • Entire BNC • Breakdown by subcorpora • Newspapers, Spoken • Discussion & Conclusions

  3. Introduction - The Basics • Adjectives: positive, comparative, superlative • happy, happier, happiest • Fast, faster, fastest • periphrastic: more, most • more intelligent, most intelligent

  4. Introduction - Markedness • Linguistic elements exist relative to each other: • Unmarked: considered to be more common and/or less complex • Marked: less common and/or more complex Keep in mind: the “notion of markedness as a type of asymmetry” (Croft, 1990: 64)

  5. Introduction – Markedness We expect that unmarked values will be as frequent, or more so, than marked values in text counts (Greenberg, 1966)

  6. Brings us to the assertion… • Greenberg (1966): Degree (adjective) positive < comparative, superlative Rephrase: Comparative and superlative adjectives are marked with respect to positive adjectives, but unmarked with respect to each other.

  7. The Current Study • Examines textual frequencies of broad classes of comparative & superlative adjectives • This is a study about [ajc] and [ajs] • Data from the British National Corpus (BNC) • written & spoken subcorpora

  8. Methods • Used Mark Davies’ VIEW website • Chart & List options • Queried the BNC by tags • Searched for [ajc] & [ajs] tags

  9. Results from the BNC as a whole

  10. [ajc] • 1,885.82/million words • Top 20 (freq./million):

  11. [ajs] • 871.67/million • Top 20 (freq./million)

  12. The story so far • Comparative [ajc] vs. Superlative [ajs]: difference of 1014.15/million words in tagged usage. • Across the BNC, comparative adjectives are more frequently occurring than superlative adjectives (t(38) = 2.32, p = .026). • Observation: Much sharper drop-off in [ajs] category in frequency after best (best 260, latest, 65; vs. further 215, better 208)

  13. The story so far

  14. How do related forms compare? • Superlative best is the most frequent of all the words tagged as [ajc] or [ajs]… so what about comparisons between related pairs?

  15. Some related comparative-superlative pairs

  16. Adjectival Activity by Subcorpus • BNC covers a number of different registers • How does activity break down?

  17. Observed differences between subcorpora

  18. Newspapers

  19. Newspapers – Most frequently used • Overall: • Comparative: better <2459>, further <2130>, higher <1470> • Superlative: best <4449>, latest <1935>, biggest <1708> • Sports: • Comparative: better <358>, further <178>, worse <81> • Superlative: best <955>, biggest <194>, latest <187> • Tabloids: • Comparative: better <136>, worse <74>, further <61> • Superlative: best <322>, biggest <165>, latest <129>

  20. better – best by register

  21. better - best • Best – <thing 627, interests 509, ever 505, friend 443, wishes 127> • In the newspaper: best known, best players, best buys, best remembered, best actress, best rated… • better – <than4414, feel 592, understanding 255, worse 214…>

  22. bigger – biggest by register

  23. bigger – biggest • biggest <world’s 306, ever 255, Britain’s 248, single 140, problem 127, Europe’s 116> • World’s Biggest, Britain’s biggest, Europe’s biggest • bigger <much 291, even 178, better 116>

  24. Summary • For both bigger – biggest and better – best, the superlative forms are heavily preferred in newspaper text.

  25. Spoken usage - briefly • Comparative adjectives are more common than superlative adjectives • Superlative adjectives are most common in scripted, televised speech, but are never more common than comparatives • TV documentaries, broadcast news programs • Comparative adjectives quite common in lectures, demonstrations, debates

  26. General Discussion • English comparative forms are generally used more frequently than superlative forms in the BNC • In cases where the pattern is reversed, examination of the word forms may reveal patterns underlying usage • Frequency of adjective use & type of adjective used varies by register • Importance of register should not be overlooked

  27. General Conclusions • If we accept that textual frequency is one of the criteria for establishing markedness, then results suggest that, in English, superlative adjectives are marked with respect to comparative adjectives. • The degree to which superlative forms are marked varies by text type Degree (adjectives) positive < comparative < superlative

  28. Parting Thoughts • What role is played by constructions? • the ______’s biggest • the best _______. • How should fixed expressions be treated in frequency counts? • E.g., Claridge (2007) removed 162 instances of frozen expressions from a study of superlative adjectives in the spoken demographic subcorpus (e.g., if worst comes to worst).

  29. References • Claridge, C. (2007). The Superlative in Spoken English. In: Facchinetti, Roberta (ed.), Corpus Linguistics twenty-five years on. Selected papers of the twenty-fifth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 121-148. • Croft, W. (1990). Markedness in typology. Chapter 4 of W. Croft, Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63-94. • Greenberg (1966). Language Universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 59. The Hague, Mouton.

More Related