1 / 35

Challenges of Influenza Control

Challenges of Influenza Control. W. Paul Glezen, M.D. Baylor College of Medicine Houston. Newly Recognized Respiratory Agents. SARS coronavirus – SARS - CoV Human metapneumonvirus - hmpv Avain influenzaviruses a) A (H5N1) b) A (H7N7) 4. Hendra – Nipah viruses.

padma
Download Presentation

Challenges of Influenza Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Challenges of Influenza Control W. Paul Glezen, M.D. Baylor College of Medicine Houston

  2. Newly Recognized Respiratory Agents • SARS coronavirus – SARS - CoV • Human metapneumonvirus - hmpv • Avain influenzaviruses a) A (H5N1) b) A (H7N7) 4. Hendra – Nipah viruses

  3. Hemagglutinin Subtypes of Influenza A Virus Adapted with permission from Levine AJ. Viruses. 1992;165.

  4. Influenza Virus Nomenclature Neuraminidase Type of Nucleoprotein Hemagglutinin A/USSR/90/77 (H1N1) VirusType GeographicOrigin StrainNumber Year ofIsolation VirusSubtype

  5. Antigenic Variants of Influenza A (H3N2) and Changing Hemagglutinin Amino Acid Positions YearVariant 1968-72 A/Hong Kong/68 1972-73A/England/72 1974-75 A/Port Chalmers/73 1975-76 A/Victoria/75 1977-78 A/Texas/77 1980-83 A/Bangkok/79 1984-85 A/Philippines/73 1985-86 A/Stockholm/85 1987-88 A/Sichuan/87 1989-90 A/Shanghai/87 1991-92 A/Beijing/89 1993-94 A/Beijing/92 1994-95 A/Shangdong/93 1995-96 A/Johannesburg/94 1996-97 A/Wuhan/95 1997-00 A/Sydney/97 2001-02 A/Panama/99 Smith etal J Infect Dis 2002;185:980-5.

  6. ESTIMATED ANNUAL AGE-SPECIFIC INFLUENZA DEATHS FOR 1990-1991 THROUGH 1998-1999 SEASONS* Age Influenza Influenza Influenza Group A(H1N1) A(H3N2) B Total  < 1 0 3 85 88 1 - 4 34 103 38 175 5 - 49 501 1,685 383 2569 50 - 64 348 3,360 684 4,392 65+ 1954 34,866 7,159 43,979 Totals 2,837 40,017 8,349 51,203 *Thompson, WW, et al, JAMA 2003; 289:179-86

  7. Estimated Annual Influenza-Associated Deaths for 1990-1991 Through 1998-1999 Seasons Using the Influenza Model All-Cause Deaths No. of Influenza Deaths Season A(H1N1) A(H3N2) B Total 1990-1991 1,988 6,033 17,549 25,570 1991-1992 6,518 45,928 566 53,012 1992-1993 1,190 19,892 19,030 40,112 1993-1994 173 48,923 404 49,500 1994-1995 572 33,767 7,129 41,468 1995-1996 14,727 23,605 7,509 45,841 1996-1997 0 55,937 12,609 68,546 1997-1998 66 70,701 649 71,416 1998-1999 293 55,367 9,698 65,358 Mean (SD) 2,836 (4,909) 40,017 (20,656) 8,349 (7,105) 51,203 (15,081) Abbreviations: NA, not applicable.*Pneumonia and influenza estimates are based on the 1990-1991 through 1997-1998 seasons. Thompson WW et al. JAMA. 2003;289:179-186.

  8. AGE-SPECIFIC ANNUAL AVERAGE RATES FOR INFLUENZA-ASSOCIATED HOSPITALIZATIONS, 1979-2001 Age Number Rate/10,000  < 5 21,156 11.4 5 - 49 47,745 2.8 50 - 64 39,198 11.1 65-69 22,168 23.0 70-74 40,552 49.2 75-79 31,319 48.9 80-84 34,640 82.9 >85 57,350 166.9 Totals 294,128 11.5

  9. ANNUAL INFLUENZA-ASSOCIATED HOSPITALIZATIONS, U.S., 1990-2001 Year Predominant Number Rate/10,000 Virus 1990-91 B 221,412 8.8 1991-92 A(H3N2) 326,331 12.8 1992-93 B+A(H3N2) 304,898 11.9 1993-94 A(H3N2) 322,736 12.4 1994-95 A(H3N2)+B 288,417 11.0 1995-96 A(H1N1)+(H3N2) 296,312 11.2 1996-97 A(H3N2)+B 490,246 18.3 1997-98 A(H3N2) 530,225 19.6 1998-99 A(H3N2)+B 503,896 18.4 1999-00 A(H3N2) 544,909 19.7 2000-01 A(H1N1)+B 316,588 11.3

  10. Estimated number of persons, influenza vaccine target groups, United States, July 1, 2002 Group Population (millions) Increased Risk 82.8 Aged > 65 y 35.6 Chronic illness 39.7 Pregnant women 2 Other children aged 6-23 mo 5.5 Other (healthy) target groups 102.6 Health care personnel aged < 65 y 7 Household contacts of persons at increased risk 75.5 Other persons aged 50-64 y 20.1 Total, target groups 185.4 Total, persons aged > 6 mo 286.4 O’Mara etal, Infect Med 2003 (Nov) 548-54.

  11. Problems With TargetingHigh Risk Patients • High risk patients are not easily accessible for vaccination • Many high risk patients are debilitated or immunocompromized and fail to respond optimally to vaccine

  12. Update: Influenza Activity, US. January 18--24, 2004 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/flu.MMRW January 30, 2004 / 53(03);63-65

  13. Influenza Mortality in U.S. Children 2003/04 152 Children <18 years reportedly died of Influenza-related causes* <6 months old 11% 6-23 months old 30% 2-5 years old 22% >5 years old 37% ACIP high-risk condition 27% Other underlying medical condition 31% Previously healthy 40% Unknown 2% *70 percent of these children had not been vaccinated. Bhat N. ACIP, June 23, 2004.

  14. Influenza Virus Infection and Illness Rates Houston Family Study, 1976-1984 Rate Per 100 Persons <2 2-5 6-10 11-17 18-24 25-34 ³35 Age (years)

  15. Impact of Influenza on School Children and Their Families Influenza-associated outcomes Rate/100* Excess illness episodes 28* Secondary illness episodes (family members) 22* Days of work missed by parents 20* Average school days missed/child 2.25* *Prospective cohort study of 313 children (K-8) in 216 families followed during 1 influenza season. Neuzil KM, et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med., 2002;156:986-991.

  16. Excess Hospitalizations per 10,000 Children/Year Average Excess Hospitalizations per 10,000 Children/Year* Patient Age *Values are weighted averages of annual excess hospitalizations for a population of 10,000 persons within the specified age group. Neuzil KM et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:225-231.

  17. Respiratory Virus Infections Associated with Hospitalizations for Acute Respiratory Conditions, Houston, 1991-1995 30 20 10 0 Influenza Viruses 30 20 10 0 Number Positive per 100 Parainfluenza Viruses 30 20 10 0 <5 5-17 18-44 45-64 ³65 Age (years)

  18. Bacterial Disease in Children with Proven Precursor Influenza • Severe Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Previously Healthy Children: The Role of Preceding Influenza Infections. O’Brien KL et al. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:784-9. • Risk-Factors for Meningococcal Disease in Victoria, Australia, in 1997. Robinson P et al. Epidemiol Infect 2001;127:261-8. • Is Bacterial Tracheitis Changing? A 14-Month Experience in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Bernstein T et al. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:459-62 • Glezen WP. Prevention of Acute Otitis Media by Prophylaxis and Treatment of Influenza Virus Infections. Vaccine 2001; 19:S56-S58.

  19. Other Complications of Influenza • Acute myositis • Neurologic • Reye’s syndrome • Encephalopathy • Febrile convulsions • Cardiac • Pericarditis • Myocarditis

  20. Rationale forAlternative Approaches • School children and working adults are the major spreaders of influenza in the community and introducers into the household • School children have the highest annual attack rate for influenza

  21. Rationale forAlternative Approaches • Immunization of school children and working adults to: • decrease absenteeism for school and work • decrease visits for medical care • decrease antibiotic prescriptions

  22. Influenza Vaccinations in Japanese School Children P&I deaths/100,000 (age adj LT/GE 65 & ref US 1970 pop) all-cause deaths/100,000 B D A C (A) all cause baseline (B) all cause excess (C) P & I baseline (D) P& I excess Reichert, TA Seminars Pediatr Infect Dis; 13:104-11

  23. Site of CAIV-T Field Trial Central Texas

  24. Non-randomized, Open Label Field Trial of Trivalent Cold Adapted Influenza Vaccine (CAIV-T) in Central Texas, 1998-2001 Indirect Effectiveness (Herd Immunity) – Age-specific rates of medically-attended acute respiratory illness (MAARI) for the intervention site compared to those for the comparison sites. Direct Effectiveness and Adjusted Efficacy – MAARI rates in CAIV-T recipients compared to rates in 9,325 age-eligible non-recipients at the intervention site and adjusted for culture-positive MAARI. Total Effectiveness – MAARI rates in CAIV-T recipients compared to rates in 16,264 age-eligible non-recipients in the comparison sites. Safety: a) Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) for 42 days after vaccination b) Occurrence of rare events associated with natural influenza virus infection c) Comparison of MAARI rates 0-14 days after vaccination to the pre- vaccination.

  25. MAARI Rates in the Intervention and Comparison Sites during Influenza Outbreaks for SWHP Members > 35 years old

  26. CAIV-T Direct Effectiveness for all MAARI and Adjusted Efficacy for Culture-Positive MAARI with both Influenza A(H1N1) and B, Temple-Belton, TX, 2000-01 Age Direct (95% CI) Adjusted (95% CI) (years) Effectiveness Efficacy 1.5-4 0.20* (0.14,0.25) 0.91 (-0.34,0.99)   5-9 0.25 (0.15,0.34) 0.80 (0.26,0.95)   10-18 0.14 (0.01, 0.26) 0.70 (0.13,0.90)   Total 0.18 (0.11,0.24) 0.79 (0.51,0.91) Subsets Influenza A(H1N1) 0.92 (0.42,0.99) Influenza B 0.66 (0.09,0.87) *statistically significant in bold numbers

  27. Safety Summary • Years 1, 2, 3 and 4: 18,780 doses of CAIV-T have been administered to 11,096 children in this community-based, open-label trial • No CAIV-T vaccine attributable serious adverse event has been observed • No CAIV-T vaccine attributable rare or unusual adverse event has been observed • Six pregnancies originating proximal to receipt of vaccine were uncomplicated (healthy full-term infants).

  28. CAIV-T FIELD TRIAL Summary • Safe-side effects do not increase direct medical costs. • Direct Effectiveness • Protection inversely related to age (VEadj 0.70-0.91) • Persists through two seasons • Heterovariant • Single dose is sufficient • Indirect Effectiveness (Herd Immunity) – For proportion vaccinated compatible with Longini Model.

  29. Implications for Control of Both Interpandemic and Pandemic Influenza • School children have the highest attack rates for influenza. • School children are the principle spreaders of influenza. • School children are accessible for rapid distribution of influenza vaccine.

  30. Acknowledgements W. Paul Glezen – Control of Epidemic Influenza Grant Co-Investigators: Pedro A. Piedra – PI, Baylor College of Medicine Mangusha Gaglani – PI, Scott & White Clinics Gayla Herschler – Coordinator, S & W Mark Riggs – Biostatistics, S & W Claudia Kozinetz – Analysis and Data Management, BCM Consultants: Ira Longini – Emory University Elizabeth Halloran – Emory University Vaccine: Paul Mendelman, MedImmune Vaccines Colin Hessel, Biostatistics, Safety Analysis, MedImmune Program Officer: Linda Lambert - NIAID

More Related