1 / 53

Diagnosing Low Back Pain

Diagnosing Low Back Pain. FARIS HAZIM ALHAFID ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON. I. History:. Mechanism of injury Associated symptoms: Bladder / bowel function Fevers / chills Sleep disturbance Numbness / tingling Prior injuries, treatment and outcomes Medications Family history Social history:

pearl-hernandez
Download Presentation

Diagnosing Low Back Pain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Diagnosing Low Back Pain FARIS HAZIM ALHAFID ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEON

  2. I. History:

  3. Mechanism of injury • Associated symptoms: • Bladder / bowel function • Fevers / chills • Sleep disturbance • Numbness / tingling • Prior injuries, treatment and outcomes • Medications • Family history • Social history: • Vocational • Education • Tobacco / ETOH / Illicit drugs • Function: ADLs & Mobility • Litigation

  4. Pain Specifics: • Quality:sharp, dull, shooting, burning, etc. • Location / Distribution: • Radicular:Dermatomal distribution, dysesthesias • Radiating: Nondermatomal • Onset: • Gradual: DDD • Acute: Disc abnormality, strain, compression fractures • Severity / Intensity • Frequency:Constant vs. Intermittent • Duration • Exacerbating and Alleviating Factors • Time of Day: If nocturnal, consider malignancy

  5. Red Flags: • Significant trauma history, or minor in older adults • Nocturnal pain in supine position with history of cancer • Bladder or bowel incontinence or dysfunction • Constitutional symptoms: • Fever / chills • Weight loss • Lymph node enlargement • Risk factors for spinal infection • Recent infection • IV drug use • Immunosuppression • Major motor weakness

  6. II. Examination:

  7. A. Physical: • Posture: • Splinting • Body language • Gait: • Antalgia • Heel / Toe pattern • Trendelenberg • Musculoskeletal: • ROM • Leg length • Vascular • Atrophy

  8. Abdomen: • Presence of masses • Back: • Inspection • Palpation • ROM • Scoliosis • Neurological: • Sensation • Motor • DTRs • Rectal if indicated: • Evaluation of sphincter tone

  9. B. Symptom Magnification Examination: • Waddell signs: Presence of nonorganic signs suggesting symptom magnification and psychological distress • Superficial or nonanatomic distribution of tenderness • Nonanatomic or regional disturbance of motor or sensory impairment • Inconsistency on positional SLR • Inappropriate/excessive verbalization of pain or gesturing • Pain with axial loading or rotation of spine • Give-away weakness: Inconsistent effort on manual motor testing with “ratcheting” rather than smooth resistance

  10. C. Pathological Examination: • Spurling’s maneuver:Lateral rotation and extension of spine resulting in neuroforaminal narrowing and nerve root encroachment, clinically reproducing extremity pain, usually in dermatomal distribution • Straight-leg raise (SLR):Elevation of lower extremity, seated or standing, resulting in neural tension at S1 nerve root with extremity pain • Patrick’s maneuver:Crossed leg with unilateral pain indicative of sacro-iliac (SI) joint dysfunction • Femoral stretch:Hip extension stretch with heel pushed to buttock in lateral supine or prone position resulting in anterior thigh pain

  11. III. Low Back Pain:

  12. A. Epidemiology: • Incidence of LBP: • 60-90 % lifetime incidence • 5 % annual incidence • 90 % of cases of LBP resolve without treatment within 6-12 weeks • 40-50 % LBP cases resolve without treatment in 1 week • 75 % of cases with nerve root involvement can resolve in 6 months • LBP and lumbar surgery are: • 2ndand 3rd highest reasons for physician visits • 5th leading cause for hospitalization • 3rd leading cause for surgery

  13. B. Disability: • Age and LBP: • Leading cause of disability of adults < 45 years old • Third cause of disability in those > 45 years old • Prevalence rate: • Increased 140 % from 1970 to 1981 with only125 % population growth • Nearly 5 million people in the U.S. are ondisability for LBP

  14. C. Lifetime Return to Work: • Success of less than 50 % if off work greater than 6 months • 25 % success rate if off work greater than 1 year • Nearly 0 % success if return to work has not occurred in 2 years

  15. D. Occupational Risk Factors: • Low job satisfaction • Monotonous or repetitious work • Educational level • Adverse employer-employee relations • Recent employment • Frequent lifting • Especially exceeding 25 pounds • Utilization of poor body mechanics in technique

  16. E. Differential Diagnoses: • Lumbar strain • Disc bulge / protrusion / extrusion producing radiculopathy • Degenerative disc disease • Spinal stenosis • Spondyloarthropathy • Spondylosis • Spondylolisthesis • Sacro-iliac dysfunction

  17. F. Diagnostic Tools: • 1. Laboratory: • Performed primarily to screen for other disease etiologies • Infection • Cancer • Spondyloarthropathies • No evidence to support value in first 7 weeks unless with red flags • Specifics: • WBC • ESR or CRP • HLA-B27 • Tumor markers: Kidney Breast Lung Thyroid Prostate

  18. 2. Radiographs: • Pre-existing DJD is most common diagnosis • Usually 3 views adequate with obliques only if equivocal findings • Indications: • History of trauma with continued pain • Less than 20 years or greater than 55 years with severe or persistent pain • Noted spinal deformity on exam • Signs / symptoms suggestive of spondyloarthropathy • Suspicion for infection or tumor

  19. 3. EMG / NCV ( Electrodiagnostics): • Can demonstrate radiculopathy or peripheral nerve entrapment, but may not be positive in the extremities for the first 3-6 weeks and paraspinals for the first 2 weeks • Would not be appropriate in clinically obvious radiculopathy • 4. Bone scan: • Very sensitive but nonspecific • Useful for: • Malignancy screening • Detection for early infection • Detection for early or occult fracture

  20. 5. Myelogram: • Procedure of injecting contrast material into the spinal canal with imaging via plain radiographs versus CT • In past, considered the gold standard for evaluation of the spinal canal and neurological compression • With potential complications, as well as advent of MRI and CT, is less utilized: • More common:Headache, nausea / vomiting • Less common:Seizure, pain, neurological change, anaphylaxis • Myelogram alone is rarely indicated • Hitselberger study 1968 Journal of Neurosurgery: • 24 % of asymptomatic subjects with defects

  21. 6. CT with myelogram: • Can demonstrate much better anatomical detail than myelogram alone • Utilized for: • Demonstrating anatomical detail in multi-level disease in pre- operative state • Determining nerve root compression etiology of disc versus osteophyte • Surgical screening tool if equivocal MRI or CT

  22. 7. CT: • Best for bony changes of spinal or foraminal stenosis • Also best for bony detail to determine: • Fracture • DJD • Malignancy • SW Wiesel study 1984 Spine: • 36 % of asymptomatic subjects had “HNP” at L4-L5and L5-S1 levels

  23. 8. Discography (Diagnostic disc injection): • Less utilized as initial diagnostic tool due to high incidence of false positives as well as advent of MRI • Utilizations: • Diagnose internal disc derangement with normal MRI / myelo • Determine symptomatic level in multi-level disease • Criteria for response: • Volume of contrast material accepted by the disc, with normals of 0.5 to 1.5 cc • Resistance of disc to injection • Production of pain---MOST SIGNIFICANT • Usually followed by CT to evaluate internal architecture, but also may utilize MRI • As outcome predictor (Coulhoun study 1988 JBJS): • 89 % of those with pain response received benefit from surgery • 52 % of those with structural change received surgical benefit

  24. 9. MRI: • Bestdiagnostic tool for: • Soft tissue abnormalities: • Infection • Bone marrow changes • Spinal canal and neural foraminal contents • Emergent screening: • Cauda equina syndrome • Spinal cored injury • Vascular occlusion • Radiculopathy • Benign vs. malignant compression fractures • Osteomyelitis evaluation • Evaluation with prior spinal surgery

  25. Has essentially replaced CT and myelograms for initial evaluations • Boden study 1990 JBJS: • 20 % of asymptomatic population less than 60 years with “HNP” • 36 % of asymptomatic population of 60 years • Jensen study 1995 NEJM: • 52 % of asymptomatic patients with disc bulge at one or more levels • 27 % of asymptomatic patients with disc protrusion • 1 % of asymptomatic patients with disc extrusion

  26. MRI with Gadolinium contrast: • Gadolinium is contrast material allowing enhancement of intrathecal nerve roots • Utilization: • Assessment of post-operative spine---most frequent use • Identifying tumors / infection within / surrounding spinal cord • Diagnosis of radiculitis • Post-operatively can take 2-6 months for reduction of mass effect on posterior disc and anterior epidural soft tissues which can resemble pre-operative studies • Only indications in immediate post-operative period: • Hemorrhage • Disc infection

  27. 10. Psychological tools: • Utilized in case scenarios where psychological or emotional overlay of pain is suspected • Symptom magnification • Grossly abnormal pain drawing • Non-responsive to conservative interventions but with essentially normal diagnostic studies • Includes: • Pain Assessment Report, which combines: • McGill Pain Questionnaire • Mooney Pain Drawing Test • MMPI • Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire • Cornell Medical Index • Eysenck Personality Inventory

  28. MRI Nomenclature:(PER NASS) • Anular fissure: Focal disruption of anular fibers in concentric, radial or transverse distribution • Disc bulge:Circumferential, diffuse, symmetric extension of anulus beyond the adjacent vertebral end plates by 3 or more mm, usually due to weakened or lax anular fibers • Disc protrusion:Focal, asymmetric extension of disc segment beyond margin of vertebral end plates into the spinal canal with most of anular fibers intact • Disc extrusion:Focal, asymmetric extension of disc segment and / or nucleus pulposis through the anular containment into the epidural space • Disc sequestration:Extruded disc segment that is detached from original with migration into the canal • Disc degeneration:Irreversible structural and histiological changes in nucleus seen on MRI T2WI images (commonly associated with bulge)

  29. Specificity / Sensitivity

  30. G. Treatment • Medications • NSAIDS • Membrane stabilizers • TCA / Neurontin • re-establish sleep pain • reduce radicular dysesthesias • Muscle relaxers: • re-establish sleep patterns • more useful in myofascial/muscular pain • Narcotics: rarely indicated • Steroids: more useful for radiculitis • Non-narcotic analgesics: Ultram

  31. Physical therapy • Modalities • electrical stimulation/TENS • Postural education / body mechanics • Massage / mobilization / myofascial release • Stretching / body work • Exercise / strengthening • Traction • Pre-conditioning / work-conditioning • Injections • Epidural blocks • Facet blocks • Trigger point • SNRB • SI joint

  32. Surgery: • Laminectomy • Fusion • Discectomy • Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy • Success rate variable 50 -85 % • Low rate of complications: • Infection • Peripheral nerve injury • Benefits: • Outpatient procedure • Minimal to no epidural scarring • No general anesthesia • Spine stability preservation • Decreased cost

  33. Chemonucleolysis • IDET: Intradiscal Electrotherapy or Spine CATH • Alternative: • Chiropractic: • Clinical studies show benefit only in first 3 weeks of symptoms • Acupuncture • Biofeedback

  34. IV. Specific Disorder Considerations

  35. A. Sacroiliitis: • History: • Trauma is very common • Repetitive LS motion--lumbar rotation or axial loading • No specific correlation with exacerbating activities • Commonly have leg length discrepancy or condition contributing • Biomechanics: • Movement of the SIJ is involuntary, usually from muscle imbalances • Can occur at multiple levels: lower extremities, hip, LS spine • Motion is complex and not single-axis based

  36. Differential Diagnosis: a. Fracture • Traumatic • Insufficiency stress fractures: elderly patient with osteoporosis without history of trauma • Fatigue stress fractures: usually athletes / soldiers b. Infection • Hematogenous spread with predisposing history • Usually unilateral symptoms present c. Degenerative joint disease d. Metabolic disease e. Referred pain

  37. f. Seronegative spondyloarthropathies • RA--usually not until late in course of disease • Ankylosing spondylitis • Psoriatic arthritis g. Primary SI tumor • Rare and usually synovial villoadenomas h. Iatrogenic instability • Via pelvic tumor resection or bone graft site i. Osteitis condensans ilii • Prevalence of 2.2 %, primarily in multiparous women • Usually self-limiting and bilateral j. Reactive diseaseas sequellae of PID

  38. Diagnostic Tools: • X-rays:Up to 25 % of asymptomatic adults over 50 years can have abnormalities • MRI / CT:Only if looking for tumor • Bone scan:Good for fractures but less favorable for inflammation • Treatment: • Medications:NSAIDS • Physical therapy • Correct limb discrepancy • Injection:Fluoroscopy-guided vs. local • Surgical fusion:Few figures for efficacy

  39. B. Cauda Equina Syndrome: • History: • Sudden, partial or complete loss of voluntary bladder function due to massive disc impingement on spinal nerves • Can include loss of sensation as well as sphincter tone • Treatment: • Urgent decompression is mandatory for prevention of irreparable / irreversible bladder damage • 12 hours is the maximum time prior to irreversible changes

  40. C. DDD and Spondylosis: • Clinical: • Up to 75 % of involvement of the spine occurs at 2 levels: L5-S1 and L4-L5 • Possible factors that contribute to development: • Changes with maturation in: • Nutrition • Disc chemistry • Hormones • Occupational forces • Progression of disc narrowing leads to degenerative changes of bony structures, especially posterior components, leading to spondylosis

  41. Treatment: • Medications • Physical therapy • Lifestyle changes: • Smoking cessation • Weight loss • Vocational changes • Injections: • Less helpful if pain is limited to central low back only • Surgery: • Laminectomy • Fusion

  42. D. Spinal Stenosis: • Clinical: • Results from narrowing of spinal canal and / or neural foramina (CONGENITAL OR DEGENERATIVE) • Most common complaint is leg pain limiting walking • Neurogenic / Pseudoclaudication = pain in lower extremities with gait • Relief can occur with: • stopping activity • sitting, stooping or bending forward • Common are complaints of weakness and numbness of extremities • Usually becomes symptomatic in 6th decade

  43. Diagnosis: • CT and MRI may yield false-positive results, therefore EMG / NCV can be helpful to confirm diagnosis • Myelography also can be confirmatory and pre-surgical screening tool • Treatment: • Medications • Physical therapy • TENS • Epidural injections • Surgical decompression laminectomy

  44. E. “HNP”: • Clinical: • Low back pain wit associated leg symptoms • Positions can induce radicular symptoms • Posterolateral disc pathology most common: • Area where anular fibers least protected by PLL • Greatest shear forces occur with forward or lateral bend • Central disc pathology: • Usually with LBP only without radicular symptoms, unlessa large defect is present

  45. Treatment: • Conservative treatment: • Saul and Saul study 1989 Spine: • > 90 % success rate of symptom resolution withnon-operative management • Bozzao study 1992 Radiology: • 69 patients with “HNP” studied longitudinally with MRI • 63 % with >30 % reduction with 48 % > 70 % reductionover time • Medications • Physical therapy • Injections • Surgery

  46. F. Pars Interarticularis Defects: • Spondylolysis: • Anatomic defect in the bony pars interarticularis within the lamina • May uni- or bilateral • Can be congenital or induced • Usually without clinical symptoms with incidental findings on radiographs

  47. Spondylolisthesis • Progression of spondylolysis with separation • Grades assigned I-IV for level of translation • Most common levels are L5-S1 (70 %) and L4-L5 (25 %) • May be asymptomatic, but can result in • Spondylosis • DDD • Radiculopathy • Treatment: • Medication • Physical Therapy • Injections • Surgery

  48. V. Chronic Pain Issues

  49. A. Pain Reinforcing Factors: • Secondary gain:Support system allows passive / inactive role for patient via catering to needs and hence fostering dependency • Environmental:Inadequate opportunity or skills to compete in the professional community • Physician knowledge deficit:In areas of diagnosis and appropriate treatment, can prolong symptoms and validate pain behavior • Worker’s compensation:Laws have become counterproductive-- financial compensation or open claim may discourage desire for return work and impede recovery • Litigation:Anticipation of large financial settlement can reinforce pain behavior and develop into learned pain behavior

  50. B. Risk Factors for Delayed Recovery:

More Related