1 / 59

Comment on Authors Who are the leading scholars? Why? (APPENDIX G)

b. Identify the leading scholars on the subject and discuss as an appendix . Motivate. Comment on Authors Who are the leading scholars? Why? (APPENDIX G). . . 1. . 4. . . SCOPOUS h -Graph

phil
Download Presentation

Comment on Authors Who are the leading scholars? Why? (APPENDIX G)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. b. Identify the leading scholars on the subject and discuss as an appendix. Motivate. • Comment on Authors Who are the leading scholars? Why? (APPENDIX G) 

  2. 1

  3. 4

  4. SCOPOUS • h-Graph • The h-Graph displays the h index for a single author, multiple authors, or a group of selected documents. The h index is based on the highest number of papers included that have had at least the same number of citations. The h index was developed by J.E. Hirsch. Hirsch defines the h index as follows: • "A scientist has indexh if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other (Np h) papers have no more than h citations each.“ • Example An h-graph for a group of selected documents or selected author(s) with an h index of 12 means that out of the total number of documents selected to produce the graph, 12 of the documents have been cited at least 12 times. Published documents with fewer citations than h, in this case less then 12, are considered, but would not count in the h index. The same is true for the group of selected authors. If the author(s) have an h index of 12, it means that out of the total number of documents produced by the author(s), 12 of the documents have been cited 12 times. 

  5. 1

  6. 5

  7. RonoldW. P. King (A’30–SM’43–F’53–LF’71) was born in Williamstown, MA, on September 19, 1905. He received the B.A. and M.S. degrees in physics from the University of Rochester, NY, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in 1927, 1929, and 1932, respectively. From 1927 to 1928, he taught at the University of Rochester, NY, from 1932 to 1933, at the University ofWisconsin, Madison, and from 1934 to 1937, at the Lafayette College, Easton, PA. In 1938, he became an Instructor at Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, in 1939, an Ass- istant Professor, in 1942, an Associate Professor, in 1946, a Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics, and in 1972, a Gordon McKay Professor Emeritus. He is the author or coauthor of 12 books, numerous articles in books and encyclopedias, and over 310 papers, many of which are in the field of antennas, electromagnetic wave propagation, and the interaction of an electromagnetic field with the human body. Dr. King was a Guggenheim Fellow in 1937–1938 and again in 1958. He was the recipient of the Distinguished Service Award from the University of Wisconsin in 1973, the Centennial Medal of the IEEE in 1985, the Harold Pender Award from The Moore School of Electrical Engineering of the University of Pennsylvania in 1986, the Distinguished Achievement Award from the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society in 1991, the IEEE Graduate Teaching Award from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in 1997, and the Chen-To Tai Distinguished Educator Award from the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society in 2001.

  8. 186 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 52, NO. 5, MAY 2004 • A Review of Analytically Determined Electric Fields and Currents Induced in the Human Body When • Exposed to 50–60-Hz Electromagnetic Fields • Ronald W. P. King, Life Fellow, IEEE I. INTRODUCTION THEpurpose of this paper is to reviewfor antenna engineers basic research carried out on a new application of the theory of linear antennas. Linear antennas familiar to antenna engineers include parasitic dipoles and monopoles. These are used as reflectors and directors in arrays. They are also used for reception. The elements involved are generally close to a half-wavelength for dipoles and a quarter-wavelength for monopoles. The new application applies to a very different situation. The elements involved are parasitic and electrically extremely short. They are not made of copper but of various organic materials embedded in a saline fluid. The antenna in question is the human body, the incident field is that of 50- to 60-Hz power lines. The problem is to review what analytic methods and models can be used to determine the electric field induced in the interior of the antenna, i.e., the human body. Abstract—In this review paper, analytical methods are used to determine the electric field and current induced in the conducting human body when this is exposed to an electromagnetic field at extremely low frequencies (ELFs) or very low frequencies (VLFs). This is done by treating it as a parasitic antenna when this is modeled successively as a sphere, an ellipsoid, and a cylinder. Because the body is electrically very short at ELF and VLF, the axial current depends primarily on the length of the body. Comparison with the ellipsoidal shape shows that the induced current is virtually independent of the cross-sectional shape. It is concluded that the axial current induced in the cylinder is a good approximation of the current induced in an actual body with the same length and mean cross sectional area. References to persons standing on the earth and with the arms raised are given. The significance of the accurate knowledge of induced currents and fields for biomedical purposes is discussed. Index Terms—Antenna theory, biological system modeling, current density, electric fields.

  9. Report. Prepare a report consisting of two separate and distinct parts. • Summarise the material of (i) to (v) above in the form of a research paper or report. 

  10. Comment on Assignment Content  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. 

  11. Comment on Assignment • Content •  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. • Do not include what is general knowledge to the readership. 

  12. Comment on Assignment • Content •  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. • Do not include what is general knowledge to the readership.  General websites floods info with non-peer-reviewed material. 

  13. Comment on Assignment • Content •  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. • Do not include what is general knowledge to the readership.  General websites floods info with non peer-reviewed material • Too little reference to hard science 

  14. Comment on Assignment • Content •  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. • Do not include what is general knowledge to the readership.  General websites floods info with epidemiology and medicine. • Too little reference to hard science. • Did you really read those references? 

  15. Comment on Assignment • Content •  Little or no comment on truth, validity, causality. Very little logic. • Do not include what is general knowledge to the readership.  General websites floods info with epidemiology and medicine. • Too little reference to hard science. • Did you really read those references? • Insufficient use of AIS databases and online search, especially for engineering. 

  16. Comment on Assignment • Content • Many discussed the effects of global warming – this was not part of the assignment. Discussion of the contribution was assignment. 

  17. Comment on Assignment • Content • Many discussed the effects of global warming – this was not part of the assignment. Discussion of the contribution was assignment. • You should have read the reference given, and identified the 9 major errors. 

  18. Comment on Assignment • Content • Many discussed the effects of global warming – this was not part of the assignment. Discussion of the contribution was assignment. • You should have read the reference given, and identified the 9 major errors. • This would have led you to the work of RM Carter (main witness against the Crown), Mudelsee, Petit. 

  19. Comment on Assignment • Content • Many discussed the effects of global warming – this was not part of the assignment. Discussion of the contribution was assignment. • You should have read the reference given, and identified the 9 major errors. • This would have led you to the work of RM Carter (main witness against the Crown), Mudelsee, Petit. • Serious lack of flow of logic. Write your ideas down, and see if you have determined a sequence of logic. 

  20. Comment on Assignment • Format and Style • A title! (Not “Literature Survey”) Consider the title carefully: “Review of the Literature and the Body of Knowledge” This is what it does, and not its name. “Evaluation of the effects of anthropogenic gasses”. 

  21. Comment on Assignment Anthropogenic Effects of Global Warming C.O. Two Department of Weather Sciences University of Hermanus INTRODUCTION Abstract – The increase in global temperature has been widely attributed to human contribution through greenhouse gas release. In this paper it is shown that in reality such predictions are based on inaccurate mathematical models, and that paleoclimatic investigation has proven that global temperature increase leads the CO2 content in the atmosphere. This reverses the classical causal relationship between temperature and greenhouse gas. Keywords – Global warming, anthropogenic A number of authors [1] - [13] have claimed the existence of a causal relationship between increased anthropogenic greenhouse gasses and a rise in global temperature. These predictions are all based on the ABC numerical model which 

  22. Comment on Assignment • Format and Style • A title! (Not “Literature Survey”) Consider the title carefully: “Review of the Literature and the Body of Knowledge” This is what it does, and not its name. “Evaluation of the effects of anthropogenic gasses”. • The Abstract!! Too often says nothing about the report! The abstract must state briefly what has been done and found. 

  23. IEEE Transactions, Journals and Letters Information for Authors • C. Abstract • The abstract should be limited to 50-200 words and should concisely state what was done, how it was done, principal results, and their significance. The abstract will appear later in various abstracts journals and should contain the most critical information of the paper. 

  24. How was it done? What was done Their significance Principal results 

  25. Comment on Assignment Anthropogenic Effects of Global Warming C.O. Two Department of Weather Sciences University of Hermanus INTRODUCTION Abstract – The increase in global temperature has been widely attributed to human contribution through greenhouse gas release. In this paper it is shown that in reality such predictions are based on inaccurate mathematical models, and that paleoclimatic investigation has proven that global temperature increase leads the CO2 content in the atmosphere. This reverses the classical causal relationship between temperature and greenhouse gas. Keywords – Global warming, anthropogenic A number of authors [1] - [13] have claimed the existence of a causal relationship between increased anthropogenic greenhouse gasses and a rise in global temperature. These predictions are all based on the ABC numerical model which 

  26. Comment on Assignment • Format and Style • A title! (Not “Literature Survey”) Consider the title carefully: “Review of the Literature and the Body of Knowledge” This is what it does, and not its name. “Evaluation of the effects of anthropogenic gasses”. • The Abstract!! Too often says nothing about the report! The abstract must state briefly what has been done and found. Keywords 

  27. Comment on Assignment Anthropogenic Effects of Global Warming C.O. Two Department of Weather Sciences University of Hermanus INTRODUCTION Abstract – The increase in global temperature has been widely attributed to human contribution through greenhouse gas release. In this paper it is shown that in reality such predictions are based on inaccurate mathematical models, and that paleoclimatic investigation has proven that global temperature increase leads the CO2 content in the atmosphere. This reverses the classical causal relationship between temperature and greenhouse gas. Keywords – Global warming, anthropogenic A number of authors [1] - [13] have claimed the existence of a causal relationship between increased anthropogenic greenhouse gasses and a rise in global temperature. These predictions are all based on the ABC numerical model which 

  28. Comment on Assignment • Format and Style • A title! (Not “Literature Survey”) Consider the title carefully: “Review of the Literature and the Body of Knowledge” This is what it does, and not its name. “Evaluation of the effects of anthropogenic gasses”. • The Abstract!! Too often says nothing about the report! The abstract must state briefly what has been done and found. Keywords • Introduction should at least summarize what is achieved in the paper. Mostly said nothing! 

  29. Comment on Assignment Anthropogenic Effects of Global Warming C.O. Two Department of Weather Sciences University of Hermanus INTRODUCTION Abstract – The increase in global temperature has been widely attributed to human contribution through greenhouse gas release. In this paper it is shown that in reality such predictions are based on inaccurate mathematical models, and that paleoclimatic investigation has proven that global temperature increase leads the CO2 content in the atmosphere. This reverses the classical causal relationship between temperature and greenhouse gas. Keywords – Global warming, anthropogenic A number of authors [1] - [13] have claimed the existence of a causal relationship between increased anthropogenic greenhouse gasses and a rise in global temperature. These predictions are all based on the ABC numerical model which 

  30. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents. 

  31. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents.  Stick with single column, approx 12 pt, 1.5 spacing. 

  32. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents.  Stick with single column, approx 12 pt, 1.5 spacing.  Note instructions. Margins 2.5 cm. 

  33. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents.  Stick with single column, approx 12 pt, 1.5 spacing. • Note instructions. Margins 2.5 cm. • References: Only those you’ve read! (And quotes!) Do not use “et al” in the reference list. No refs. In abstract Why do I want to see V,#,pp,m.y? 

  34. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents.  Stick with single column, approx 12 pt, 1.5 spacing. • Note instructions. Margins 2.5 cm. • References: Only those you’ve read! (And quotes!) Do not use “et al” in the reference list. No refs. In abstract Why do I want to see V,#,pp,m.y?  Not 10^6 106 Ml 

  35. Comment on Assignment • Format  Do not include a table of contents.  Stick with single column, approx 12 pt, 1.5 spacing. • Note instructions. Margins 2.5 cm. • References: Only those you’ve read! (And quotes!) Do not use “et al” in the reference list. No refs. In abstract Why do I want to see V,#,pp,m.y? • Not 10^6 106 Ml •  Shift text to fill pages. 

  36. Comment on Assignment Grammar 

  37. Comment on Assignment Grammar Count and non-count nouns: 

  38. Text and language • 5 Text and Language. • 5.1 Writing http://www.iscribe.org/english/writ.html • 5.2 Grammar http://owl.english.purdue.edu/exercises/2/ • 5.2.1 Adjective or Adverb? • 5.2.2 Articles • 5.2.3 Prepositions http://www.iscribe.org/english/prep.html • 5.2.4 Tense Consistency • 5.3 Punctuation http://www.iscribe.org/english/punc.html • http://owl.english.purdue.edu/exercises/3/ • 5.3.1 Basic Punctuation • 5.3.2 Apostrophe's • 5.3.3 Commas • 5.3.4 Semicolons http://lilt.ilstu.edu/golson/punctuation/ 

  39. Text and language • 5 Text and Language. • 5.4 Sentence http://www.iscribe.org/english/sent.html • http://owl.english.purdue.edu/exercises • 5.4.1 Independent and dependant clause • 5.4.2 Sentence Fragments • 5.4.3 Sentence Structure: Run-ons, Comma Splices, and Fused Sentences • 5.4.4 Subject-Verb agreement 

  40. Punctuation Made Simple http://www.stpt.usf.edu/pms/comma.html The Commas • The comma tells the reader to pause, just as the blinking yellow light tells a driver to slow down and proceed with caution. Some writers can tell where a comma is needed by reading their prose aloud and inserting a comma where there seems to be a clear pause in the sentence. This may work much of the time if you read the sentence carefully and accurately. However, this procedure is not the most precise way to approach comma usage. Below are four general ways to use commas with a reasonable degree of certainty. • 1) Between Items in a Series • When you are listing three or more items in a sentence, simply place a comma between each member of the list. Here are two examples: • Mr. Sanchez used the money that he won from the sweepstakes to buy a house, a car, and a small yacht. 

  41. http://www.stpt.usf.edu/pms/comma.html • 2) Between Two Sentences • … However, more often we glue two sentences together with a comma and conjunction (such as and or but). … the conjunction and comma are equivalent to a semicolon when you’re connecting sentences. Here are three examples: • The Suncom Corporation has just acquired the OILCO company, and it has agreed to sell OILCO’s oil-drilling rights in Texas as soon as possible.I knew that the price of IBM stock would increase after it entered the home computer market, but I had no idea that the price would skyrocket.I first conducted a thorough audit of the company, and I then interviewed the manager to try to determine how much money was missing. • Each sentence above is made up of two sentences glued together with a comma and conjunction. • , conjunction SENTENCE SENTENCE 

  42. Punctuation Made Simple http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~olson/pms/semicolon.html The Semicolon • The semicolon is another important tool you can use when you write. There are two ways to use this punctuation mark: as a connector between two sentences and as a supercomma. • 1) To Connect Two Sentences • The semicolon is most often used to connect two sentences. Obviously, the sentences ought to be relatively close in content, but other than that you can connect any two sentences with a semicolon. • The diagram below may help you remember this usage: • ; • As a communicator, you are always putting together complex items in your prose and showing how they relate to one another. A semicolon is an economical way to join two sentences, and therefore two ideas, so that your reader sees the relationship. For example, you may write any of the following sentences: • Jim is a good typist; he makes few mistakes. SENTENCE SENTENCE 

  43. http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~olson/pms/semicolon.html • 2) As Supercomma • As you know, you normally separate the members of a list with commas, as in this sentence: • I have just bought shares in IBM, USAG, and ITT. • The commas let the reader know where one item ends and the next begins. Sometimes, however, you have a list of complex items and one (or more) of the items already contains a comma. … • Suncom Corporation has subsidiaries in four cities: New York, New York, Wilmington, Ohio, Houston, Texas, and San Francisco, California. • …you can make the semicolon a supercomma between each of the members so that your meaning is clear: • Suncom Corporation has subsidiaries in four cities: New York, New York; Wilmington, Ohio; Houston, Texas; and San Francisco, California. 

More Related