Globalisation and crime in contemporary society

1. Globalisation and crime in contemporary society Green crime Crime against the enviroment

2. Who…… What…… Why…… Should… Picture Could…… When… Where…… How……

3. How is green crime linked to Globalisation?

4. To know what impact globalisation has had on crime. • To understand the impact globalisation has had on crime. • To be able to evaluate sociological explanations of globalisation and crime. Lesson Overview Level of difficulty of key words used in activity 8 Questions VCOP 8 questions • SMSC- What rights do all human beings have? (state crime) • Do humans have more rights than animals and the environment? If so what are they? (consider within green crime)

5. How is green crime linked to globalisation Green crime is increasingly seen as a form of global crime for two reasons REASON 1 The planet is a single ecosystem in which humans being ,other species and the enviroment are interconnected and interdependant . Harm done to other species or aspects of the enviroment such as air ,water supplies , the ocean and the rainforest are seen as increasingly impacting negatively on on the quality and future of humanlife where ever it is in the world .

6. Reason 2 –why green crime is linked to globalisation • green crime is carried out by powerful interests, particularly transnational corporations such as oil and chemical companies working with the co-operation of nation states and local wealthy elites

7. Manufactured risks -Beck • Many of the threats to our ecosystem cames from manufactured risks and this is a result of massive demand for consumer goods and technology which has an effect on us(humanity) but on our enviroment to. • For example greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to global warming and climate change . • We live in societies threatened by global risks

8. Policing green crime Difficulty in policing green crime • Very few local or international laws governing the state of the enviroment . International laws difficult to construct because not all countries agree to sign up to global agreements . For examples USA & China reluctant to agree to meet international targets to reduce carbon emissions . • Laws that exist are shaped by powerful capitalists interests , esp global ‘big business’. Gov in developing countries to question and take action against transnational corporations because they are dependant on them for their income . Laws that do exist to protect enviroment is often weak

9. Sociologial perspectivesRadical criminologist : Rob White • Green crime should be defined as ‘any action that harms the physical enviroment and any creatures that live within it , even if no law has technically been broken’ • Current laws are inconsistent as they often different across countries and biased as they are influenced by businesses who have vested interest in harming the enviorment for their own gain because the business require that

10. Eco-centric vs anthropocentric view of green crime Eco-centric Damage to the enviroment is damage to the other species as well putting human race at risk in the future Anthropocentric (this is the view of big business) Humans have the right to exploit the enviroment and other species for their own benefit . White -argues that this capitalist ideology is responsible for a great deal of enviormental harm

11. Key study : Nigel South –classifying green crime • Primary crime • Direct result of the destruction and degradation of the planets resources • Crimes of air pollution –industrial carbon and greenhouse gas emissions • Crimes of deforestation-illegal logging (you can further study this in the handout povided ) • Crimes of species decline and animal rights • Crimes of fresh water abd marine pollution such as iol spillages • Secondary crime • Crimes that are a result of flouting existing laws and regulations • Dumping toxic waste-esp developing world • Breach of health and safety rules causing disaster such as Bhopal disaster • Offloading products such as pharmaceuticals onto third world markets after they have been banned on safety grounds in the west

12. Evalaution of green criminology • Green criminology recognises the growing importance of enviromental issues and manufactured global risks • It recognises the interdependence of humans ,other species and the enviroment • However its focus on harm rather than criminality means green criminology is often accused of being engaged with subjective intrepetation rather than objective scientific analysis and is therefore biased.

13. Examiners notes in relation to theory and methods • Research methods • Operationalising means the measurement of abstract concpets, Green crime is easy to measure because it is legally defined but harm is more difficult because it is a matter of intrepetation • Theory • It would make sense to use green crime to illustrate the crimogenic nature of capitalism . If an exam essay tilte focuses on Marxist explnation of crime and deviance

14. Examine some of the ways in which green crime and globalisation may be related. (12 marks)

15. Globalisation and crime in cotemporary society Human rights and state crime

16. Defintion of state crime & examples • Illegal activties carried out by the agents of the state such as armed services, the secret services ,civil servants ,the police and prision services on behalf of the government and political leaders in the name of state interests. • Genocide ,ethnic cleansing , use of torture ,assasination of political opponents ,supporting terrorists activities against elected governments and invading less powerful states.

17. Mini debate George Bush & Tony Blair‘technically war criminals’ Discuss…

18. George Bush & Tony Blair‘technically war criminals’ • USA and UK invaded Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power • Some argue this broken international laws as they have not secured the agreement of the international community via United Nations Security

19. Eugene McLaughlin • Censorship of the media and institutional racism as state crimes • Herman Schweindinger definitions of state crimes should include also human rights crime ,violating people’s right (human rights) should be defined illegal and therefore is criminal . However his definition is broad . • He suggest is some groups are denied same opps as the majority of the population on the basis of racism,sexism and homphobia , or if they are economically exploited results in unequal conditions that are a results of crimes against human rights

20. Disagreement over what counts as state crimes • state crimes that is carried out by powerful people or groups who can define their activies as legitimate , this makes it difficult to measure the extent of state crime . • Gov have the power to cover up such activities and actually control the flow of information and esp the media by issuing legal instructions to prevent journalists for speaking about state crimes in the ‘public interest’

21. Continued • The powerful can define what counts as crime on society . What is defined as crime or violence is an ideological construct. E.g gov can define killing done by a member of the public as a problem but this would not apply if it is done by a soldier . • This is ideological relativity –gov can decide who is defined as terrorists or freedom fighter and what counts as war crimes. E.g Holocaust =war crime but dropping atom bomb in Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the West is seen as necessary

22. Continued: Cohen • cohen critical of Schwendinger that state crime should include violating human rights • Genocide and torture are clearly crimes but economic exploitation is not clearly criminal but is morally unacceptable . • There is not enough agreement over what makes up human rights . For example most people would accept that freedom should be a human right but not everyone would agree that freedom from poverty is a right • Difficult to find out extent of state crime because of governments denial of their actions or justifying their actions to cover up their illegal acts . • E.g national interest • Those who carry out acts on behalf of gov do not see themsleves as criminal they use techniques of neutralization to deny or justify crimes . • deny their victims by labelling them as terrotists or extremists • They deny injury or damage by saying the other side started it • deny responsibility by saying they were simply following orders or doing their duty

23. Cohen criticises Schwendinger • Immorality is being confused with criminality • He is taking a high moral value position attempting to impose this view in the world of criminology • Links to whether sociology should be objective or subjective • Schwendinger is clearly in the other camp

24. Kelman and Hamilton –’crimes of obedience’ • Socialised into believing it is their duty to obey and that their behaviour is acceptable and necessary because enemies are animals and monsters to which normal rule of morality does not apply • Critics of the concept of state crimes argue that the so called criminality of state crime is outweighed by the fact that the act was committed in the name of national interests • E.g necessary to go beyond law in defeating terrorism so assasination and torture are ‘necessary evils

25. Examiners comments theory and methods • Methods • Difficult to research state crime we consider ocs hiding conventional crimes-dark figure of crime but this is even harder and acts as the true dark figure of crime • The is a new area and still evolving . It is important to be evaluative you may have noctied how the study of state crime is relant on secondary sources be aware of the strenghts and weaknesses of these.

26. Exam question