1 / 25

Lecture 21

Lecture 21. 6.4 keV Fe line and the Kerr metric Satellite observatories Attitude and boresight X-ray instrumentation and calibration (mostly XMM). (XMM users’ guide: http://xmm.esac.esa.int/external/xmm_user_ support/documentation/uhb/index.html).

ping
Download Presentation

Lecture 21

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 21 • 6.4 keV Fe line and the Kerr metric • Satellite observatories • Attitude and boresight • X-ray instrumentation and calibration (mostly XMM). • (XMM users’ guide: • http://xmm.esac.esa.int/external/xmm_user_ support/documentation/uhb/index.html)

  2. Fe lines in AGN – what this can tell us about GR • Fe: iron of course. There is a fluorescence line at 6.4 keV (in the rest frame). • AGN: Active Galactic Nucleus. • No-one has seen one close up – but almost certainly, these are accretion disks about a large black hole. • GR: here this doesn’t mean gamma ray, but General Relativity. • We expect to see GR effects near a giant black hole, because the gravitational force is so extreme.

  3. (Tentative) cross-section through an AGN: To us Flare Jet Continuum background from halo Fe fluor. Flare additional continuum Accretion disk BH Accretion disk halo hot Very Innermost stable orbits – about 6rg for non-spinning BH; closer in for spinning BH. Jet

  4. Fluorescence from a ‘cool reflector’. From A Fabian et al, PASP 112, 1145 (2000)

  5. How ionization modifies this From A Fabian et al, PASP 112, 1145 (2000)

  6. A Doppler-broadened spectral line – predictions of various theories: An accretion disk seen from above: Slow – small DS Profiles just for the two dashed annuli. Fast – large DS Fainter outside for whole disk Brighter inside From A Fabian et al, PASP 112, 1145 (2000)

  7. Theory - spinning vs non-spinning BH Spinning (so-called Kerr-metric BH) Non-spinning (so-called Schwartzschild BH) From A Fabian et al, PASP 112, 1145 (2000)

  8. Time-varying behaviour in MGC -6-30-15.This is a Seyfert I galaxy. From Tanaka et al (1995). 1997: time-averaged. 1994: time-averaged. 1994: in a deep minimum. 1997: at flare peak. From A Fabian et al, PASP 112, 1145 (2000)

  9. Attitude • The orientation of the spacecraft in the sky is called its attitude. • It isn’t just the direction it points to, attitude specifies the roll angle as well. • One way to define this is via a pointing vector and a parallactic angle. • However, as with any trigonometric system, this has problems at poles. • Better is to define a Cartesian coordinate frame of 3 orthogonal vectors. • Each vector defined by direction cosines in the sky frame. • Attitude is then an attitude matrixA. • This is isotropic (no trouble at poles). • Easy to convert between different reference frames. • Whatever you do, avoid messing about with Euler angles. Ugh.

  10. Sky frame or basis. z at dec=90° Unless you have good reason not to, always construct a Cartesian basis according to the Right-Hand Rule: xy screws toward z; yz screws toward x; zx screws toward y. y at RA=6 hr x at RA=0 “Direction cosines” really just means Cartesian coordinates.

  11. RA/dec  Cartesian (ie, direction cosines). z at dec=90° y at RA=6 hr x at RA=0 To invert this:

  12. Spacecraft basis (green vectors). zsky Attitude matrix: xs/c ysky xsky ys/c zs/c

  13. Conversion from sky to spacecraft basis: zsky Attitude matrix: xs/c ysky xsky ys/c zs/c Inverting it:

  14. Boresights • Ideally, each instrument on a satellite would be perfectly aligned with the spacecraft coordinate axes. • In real life, there is always some misalignment. This is called the boresight of the instrument (I think it is an old artillery term). • Define a set of Cartesian axes for each instrument. • Components of these axes in the spacecraft reference system (basis) form the boresight matrix Bfor that instrument.

  15. Boresights • With these matrices, conversion between coordinate systems is easy. Suppose we have an x-ray detection which has a position vector v|inst in the instrument frame. If we want to find where in the sky that x-ray came from, we first have to express this vector in the sky frame Cartesian system (new vector = v|sky). This is simple. Since we have: • then

  16. Attitude and boresights • NOTE that attitude varies with time as the spacecraft slews from target to target – but there is ALSO attitude jitter within an observation. • XMM has a star tracker to measure the attitude. • Attitude samples are available at 10 second intervals. • So to build up a sky picture from x-ray positions in the instrument frame, one has to change to a new attitude matrix whenever the deviation grows too large. • Boresights can also change with time, due to flexion of the structure, but this is slow. • Calibration teams measure them from time to time.

  17. Other coordinate systems: • The fundamental spatial coord system is the chip coordinate system – in CCD pixels. • Note that for time and energy as well as in the spatial coordinates, coordinate values are ultimately pixellized or discrete. • This defines the uncertainty with which they are known (to ±half the pixel width). • Rebinning can give rise to Moiré effects (somewhat similar to aliasing in the Fourier world). • ‘Dithering’ can avoid this.

  18. X-ray Observatories • You need to be in space, because the atmosphere efficiently absorbs x-rays. • Most of the currently interesting results are coming from: • Chandra (good images, so-so spectra) • XMM-Newton (so-so images, good spectra) • SWIFT (looks mostly at GRB afterglows) although there are several more. • How do you make an image from x-rays? Don’t they go through everything? So how can you make a reflector?

  19. X-ray Observatories - mirrors • Wolter grazing-incidence mirrors: • reflectivity of any EM radiation gets higher for a low angle of incidence. Double reflection Can nest many shells of differing diameter. Paraboloid Hyperboloid Behaves like a thin lens set here.

  20. X-ray Observatories - detectors • Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) are used, just as for optical. The workings are slightly different though. e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- ...then read out. At optical wavelengths: At x-ray wavelengths: e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- ...then read out. Time

  21. X-ray Observatories - detectors • Basic substance of the CCD is silicon – but ‘doped’ with impurities which alter its electronic structure. • There are several sorts, eg: • Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) • pn • The CCD surface is divided into an array of pixels. • A photon striking the material ejects some electrons which sit around waiting to be harvested. • The number of ejected electrons is proportional to the energy of the photon.

  22. X-ray Observatories - detectors • CCD operation is in frame cycles. Long accumulation time Short readout time

  23. X-ray Observatories - detectors • CCDs have to be read out sequentially (slow). Columns Rows Digitizer (ADC) Out Readout row

  24. X-ray Observatories - detectors • The readout operation consists of the following steps: • For each CCD row, starting with that nearest the readout row, move the charges into the next lowest row. • In the readout row, starting at the pixel nearest the output, shift the charges into the next lowest pixel. • Convert the analog charge quantity (it is an integer number of electrons, but such a large integer that we can ignore quantum ‘graininess’) to a digital number. • This is done in an Analog to Digital Converter (ADC). • Send that number to the outside world.

  25. X-ray Observatories - detectors • For x-ray detection, we want to arrange the frame duration so that we expect no more than 1 x-ray per pixel per frame. • Why? Because if we can be pretty sure that all the charge per pixel per frame comes from a single x-ray, we can determine the energy of the x-ray.  x-ray spectroscopy. • XMM example: • Spatial resolution is ~1 arcsec (fractional ~10-3). • Spectral resolution is ~100 eV (fractional ~10-2). • Time resolution is ~1 second (fractional ~10-5).

More Related