1 / 21

The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region

The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region Is there room for 45,000 households in the redevelopment area, according to local land use plans?. One challenge to allocating redevelopment: Places where future landuse density is less than existing land use

porter
Download Presentation

The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region Is there room for 45,000 households in the redevelopment area, according to local land use plans?

  2. One challenge to allocating redevelopment: Places where future landuse density is less than existing land use Black = Existing Units per Acre (UPA) > Future UPA. Many of these polygons are now Single-Family (SF) Medium or SF High, but the future land use is SF Low.

  3. Black = UPA > Future UPA, excluding where LU = SF Medium or SF High

  4. In these polygons, FLU employment > LU employment. Red outline = Redevelopment Area Most of Olathe and Lee’s Summit is included because of the introduction of blended chips into the FLU.

  5. Black = developed polygons where FLU employment > LU employment, in the redevelopment area. Current calculated emps: 117,701 Future emps (gross) 475,000 Difference: 357,300

  6. These are vacant/ag polygons containing employment. They could hold 200,000 gross emps.

  7. Developed polygons FLU UPA > LU UPA.

  8. Black = developed polygons where FLU UPA > LU UPA, in the redevelopment area. Current calculated units: 104,426 Future units (gross) 422,351 Difference: 317,925

  9. Vacant polygons containing housing units could add another 164,705 gross units.

  10. Redevelopment of non-SF developed polygons within the redevelopment area and within activity centers would result in a change from 253 units to 106,000 units

  11. Vacant within redevelopment area Redevelopment within activity centers 164,705 gross units + 106,000 gross units = 271,000 units

  12. DOWNTOWN KCMO Vacant within redevelopment area Redevelopment within activity centers 9,000 gross units + 42,000 gross units = 51,000 units

  13. Developed polygons (purple, orange, red) are only displayed within activity centers. Redevelopment of non-SF developed polygons within the redevelopment area and within activity centers (black) would result in a change from 253 units to 106,000 units

  14. Redevelopment of non-SF developed polys within the redevelopment area and within activity centers, INCLUDING vacant/ag polys would result in a change from 253 units to 127,800 units

  15. 2012 Potential Redevelopment 2010 Forecast Infill

  16. Downtown to 31st Street Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 30,481

  17. Olathe Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 8,200

  18. Lee’s Summit Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 5,300

  19. Wyandotte Core Current calculated units: 15 Future units: 5,400

  20. Platte County Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 5,800 North Oak Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 7,900

  21. Independence Core Current units: 0 Future units: 3,000 24/40 Current units: 0 Future units: 4,300 Raytown Current units: 0 Future units: 1,370

More Related