1 / 42

DEAP: D ark Matter E xperiment with A rgon P SD

DEAP: D ark Matter E xperiment with A rgon P SD. Mark Boulay Queen’s University. arxiv.org:/astro-ph/0402007. Outline: Dark Matter Problem Current techniques for direct detection of dark matter Direct detection with Liquid Argon (LAr) Some advantages of LAr

preston
Download Presentation

DEAP: D ark Matter E xperiment with A rgon P SD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DEAP:Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD Mark Boulay Queen’s University arxiv.org:/astro-ph/0402007

  2. Outline: • Dark Matter Problem • Current techniques for direct detection of dark matter • Direct detection with Liquid Argon (LAr) • Some advantages of LAr • Design of and Results from DEAP-0: • 1 kg LAr cryostat at LANL (preliminary results) • Plans for DEAP-1: • 10 kg LAr cryostat at Queen’s (SNOLab early space)

  3. The Dark Matter Problem • Rotation curves • Mass density distributed more broadly than visible objects • Non-luminous halo required to describe rotation curves -First reported in 1933 by Zwicky

  4. Precision WMAP measurements map.gsfc.nasa.gov • Host of precision measurements culminating in WMAP. • Interpret power spectrum data by fit to cosmology • Cold dark matter fraction accurately determined DARK MATTER PROBLEM is > 70 years old and experimentally sound : do not understand origin of large fraction of matter in universe.

  5. Enter Supersymmetry… (…or a new type of particle makes up the dark matter…) • SUSY provides a “natural extension” to the standard model of • particle physics • “Attractive route towards unifying all four forces ” -theorists • Introduces a new symmetry (R-parity) and possible existence • of a new stable particle • New particle properties could well be consistent with those • needed to account for the missing dark matter • Generically, direct searches are looking for WIMPs, • Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, which would make up • the dark matter • So SUSY provides a particle physics solution to a • cosmological problem (SUSY not motivated by DM problem)

  6. 40Ar c 40Ar c Direct WIMP detection in terrestrial experiment • WIMPs can elastically scatter in detectorproducingnuclear recoils • Rate in terrestrial detector depends on WIMP mass and WIMP- nucleon interaction cross-section • Energy spectrum of recoils is exponential with E ~ 50 keV • Experimental challenge is to detect small number of nuclear recoils • with low energy threshold (order event/1000 kg/year > 10 keV)

  7. The problem with direct WIMP detection (…or why these experiments are so tough…) • Radioactive decays from materials, and cosmic rays and their by-products, are backgrounds to recoiling nucleus signal • Even clean materials can lead to billions decays/year for kg-scale detectors. • Background events can be further divided into two classes: • Events that will ‘look like’ nuclear recoils • Events that won’t ‘look like’ nuclear recoils

  8. Backgrounds in WIMP searches • In general, this roughly approximates to: • Neutron related backgrounds (since n’s can elastically scatter the • target nuclei just like WIMPs can) • b/g radiation. This will deposit energy in a detector but not scatter • the target nuclei. The approach taken is to reduce: 1. by using very clean materials and running experiment underground 2. by using clean materials and distinguishing n.r. events from b/g s Principle difference between DM experiments is how the distinction of n.r. events from b/g events is accomplished

  9. ASIDE: a-emitters plated out on detector surfaces as potentially dangerous background LAr Cryostat wall Decay in bulk LAr tagged by a-particle scintillation a 210Po on surface Decay from surface releases untagged recoiling nucleus a

  10. CDMS (Cryogenic Dark Matter Search) Exploits difference in deposited charge versus phonon energy between b/g ‘s and nuclear recoils g rays Collection of small detectors simultaneously measure deposited energy in charge and phonon channels ~1 kg / “tower” Current best limit neutrons ZIP detector 250 g Ge Image from cdms.berkeley.edu

  11. XENON (proposed experiment) Many (most) DM experiments are technically very complex in order to discriminate b/g ‘s from nuclear recoils Total Xe mass 1 tonne Exploits difference in ionization signal (electrons) versus scintillation signal (photons) between b/g‘s and nuclear recoils Figure from Elena Aprile Dark Matter 2004

  12. DEAP (Dark Matter Experiment with Argon PSD) • Spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering on liquid 40Ar • Spherical volume of LAr instrumented with PMTs to detect • scintillation photons • Discrimination of g/b backgrounds using only scintillation time information from PMTs • Generic spherical design scaleable to large target mass • DEAP-n: n = log10(target mass [kg])

  13. Scintillation in liquid argon • ionizing radiation leads to formation of excited dimers in argon (Ar*2) • dimers are produced in either singlet or triplet excited states • decays to ground state have characteristic times, and can result • in photon emission • ~ 2 ns for singlet state (prompt) • 1.6 us for triplet state (delayed) • Fraction of dimers in singlet versus triplet state depends on • ionization density along track, and thus on incident particle • type • Net effect is a difference in the photon emission versus time • curve for g/b events and for nuclear recoils

  14. http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0411358 scintillation pulse-shape analysis for discrimination of e- vs nuclear recoils -> no electron-drift DEAP : Dark-matter Experiment with Argon PSD

  15. Idea is to use scintillation photons only for discrimination in DEAP… …allows for simple detector design and possibly a more easily realizeable large-scale experiment

  16. Some advantages of LAr • Inexpensive : 10 kg = 25$ or Lar • Good light yield, 40000 photons/MeV = good resolution • Used extensively, very large experiments underground • Easily accessible temperature (~85 K) • Same requirements as LN for cryogenic components • “Noble” noble gas • Liquid experiment can be continuously or periodically • purified (advantage over crystals) • Allows simple, inexpensive, scalable design

  17. Simulation of discrimination in argon • 6 pe/keV for 75% coverage, with • 1500 Hz PMT noise • Backgrounds from Ham. R9288 (approx. 70 mBq/PMT) • 5 ns PMT resolution • 20% photon detection efficiency • 100 ns trigger window sets T0 • Fprompt = Prompt hits(100 ns)/Total hits(15 us) • ~2 kg Ar with 10 keVee threshold (60 pe) Dominant backgrounds assuming proper shielding, depth, and clean construction.

  18. Background rejection with LAr (simulation) From simulation, rejection > 108 @ 10 keV (>>!) (Goal for SuperCDMS is 108) 108 simulated e-’s 100 simulated WIMPs

  19. DM Sensitivity with LAr with 1-year exposure LAr with 10 keV (electron) threshold

  20. Direct detection prediction from SUSY NMSSM (Next-to-MSSM) Prediction from talk by David Cerdeno at SUSY 2005 (JHEP 12 (2004) 048) 10-44 cm2 (10 kg LAr) 10-45 cm2 (100 kg LAr) Maybe within our reach!

  21. DEAP-0 (1 kg) at LANL • PMT in air outside of large • vacuum chamber • ~1 kg LAr viewed by single • 2” PMT • calibration with g’s, n’s • (tagged 22Na and AmBe) • Demonstration of PSD • Test long term gain stability 40” DEAP-0 Timeline: Design: Jan 05 Order components: Feb 05 Rec’d all components: May 05 Assembly: June,Jul 05 Data run & analysis: Jul, Aug 05 (Analysis being completed) DEAP-0 M. Boulay, A. Hime, L. Rodriguez (LANL) Supported by LANL LDRD, with technical assistance and advice from: Steve Lamoreaux, Dan McKinsey, James Nikkel, Seppo Pentilla, …

  22. Gas Handling System for DEAP-0 SAES purifier, < 0.1 ppb

  23. DEAP-0 construction at LANL • Conflat construction, Cu gaskets, “standard” components • where possible to reduce cost • ~1 kg of liquid argon with 2” windows, viewed by 1 PMT • in air

  24. DEAP-0 Construction at LANL Liquid nitrogen cooling, Ar gas in Cu coils

  25. DEAP-0

  26. DEAP-0 in vacuum chamber

  27. DEAP-0 PMT setup at LANL PMT coupled to LAr through chamber window Source with CsI/PMT for gamma tag Vacuum chamber CsI tag LAr PMT source windows

  28. DEAP-0 windows (post-warm-up) Window to argon chamber …room for improvement!

  29. PMT pulses from LAr, in coincidence with g in CsI g-like neutron-like

  30. Triplet lifetime check

  31. Discrimination in liquid argon AmBe runs (neutron calibration) Na-22 runs 4 x 106 tagged g’s <pe/keV> = 0.1

  32. Discrimination in liquid argon from DEAP-0 <pe> = 60 O(1in 105) consistent with random coincidence with room neutrons (preliminary) preliminary <pe> = 60 corresponds to 10 keV with 75% coverage • Final analysis and systematics evaluation being done (Kevin and Reuble)

  33. Conceptual design of DEAP-1 • ~10 kg Lar • Spherical geometry • PMTs coupled to inner • chamber through light guides • PMTs surrounded by polyethylene for n absorption • Inner chamber could be • (stainless steel,acrylic,copper) • Investigate using expanded • polystyrene for thermal insulation (vacuum chamber if needed)

  34. Photon detection for DEAP-1 Acrylic light guide (UVA) Low background PMT window or acrylic vessel LAr 85K 300K 6” Acrylic guide backs off PMT to reduce (a,n) neutron backgrounds, and to reduce thermal load. Q = kA(Th-Tc)/L ~ 1 Watt

  35. Photomultiplier tube (PMT) backgrounds in DEAP-1 For reference, 250 events/year for the ET9390 PMTs

  36. Inner cryostat backgrounds in DEAP-1 • 4 neutrons/year/kg of SS (Peter Skensved) • ~3% leakage into signal region (Geant4 Monte-Carlo) • problematic background! • Investigating acrylic chamber for inner cryostat (Kevin Graham) • Could possibly use Copper cryostat • Internal backgrounds (impurities in LAr) • Will use gas purification and cold charcoal traps • In-situ assay of internal backgrounds with DEAP-1

  37. Active neutron veto LAr Vacuum region n Neutron active veto (conceptual) Note: thermal neutron capture cross-section on Ar: 675 mbarn • Active veto can mitigate internal and external low-energy (a,n) neutrons • Relaxes internal (a,n) requirements • Possible overlap with SNO+ for liquid scintillator active veto

  38. elg = 0.8 epmt = 0.25 a = 0 Y0 = 40 photons/keV Optimizing optics for DEAP-1 “Toy” optics model Model incorporating reflective losses and absorption: Y=R[1/S-1]elgepmt(1-a)Y0 Y = yield [photons/keV] R = surface reflectivity S = surface PMT coverage elg = light guiding efficiency epmt = PMT efficiency a = absorption Y0 = photon production yield Need real model to map inputs to yield, O(10%) (Kati N.)

  39. Short-term activities for DEAP-1 at Queen’s • Develop optical model for use in chamber and light guide design, • test model in the lab: • GEANT4 simulation for optics • Most parts ordered for light guide/reflectivity tests using • a-scintillation in gaseous argon (~1 month to parts?) • Design cryostat for proper cooling and background requirements • for 10 kg detector and for optics/background tests with LAr • Inner chamber R&D (acrylic versus copper versus stainless) • Design and construction of clean room • Once these are in place, design and build clean 10 kg • experiment (DEAP-1)

  40. DEAP-1 Timeline and SNOLab • Currently designing cryostat, selecting components • Clean room being constructed at Queen’s • Plan is to construct and commission DEAP-1 at Queens O(6 months) • Calibration & verification of PSD above ground, spring/summer 2006 • Seek “early” SNOLab space Fall 2006 for UG running • 10-44 cm2 with one year livetime Funding for DEAP-1 is in place with CFI/startup grant from Queen’s and LANL LDRD support O(750K total) • Philosophy is to design DEAP-1 so that scaling to DEAP-3 • is feasible, x 100 improvement in background required

  41. Response of SNOLab Experiment Advisory Committee to DEAP: “Very interesting and recent technical developments using LAr provide the possibility for a conceptually simple and relatively inexpensive route to a large-scale detector. Given existing funds and plan to go forward, we strongly encourage submission of a technical proposal for DEAP-1.” -SNOLab EAC recommendations, August 2005 meeting

  42. Conclusions • DEAP-0 (1 kg) succesfully executed at LANL • Demonstrated discrimination using PSD only in LAr • Currently designing DEAP-1 (10kg) for construction at Queen’s • Possibly ready for deployment in early SNOLab space (Sept 2006) • 10-44 cm2 sensitivity with 1 live-year, 10 keV threshold • Funding for DEAP-1 in place, CFI/startup + LANL LDRD • Opportunity for hardware design, analysis, Monte-Carlo simulation, underground experiment deployment and running experience, and • …potential Discovery of New Physics beyond the new Standard Model… on the timescale of a PhD

More Related