300 likes | 466 Views
THE CASE FOR MODIFIED GRAVITY. James Binney Oxford University. Outline. MOND as a replacement for DM (Sanders & McGaugh 02) Absence of DM interior to the Sun (Bissantz et al 03, 04) TeVeS Lorentz-covariant MOND (Bekenstein 2004). NGC 3198. Begeman (1987).
E N D
THE CASE FOR MODIFIED GRAVITY James Binney Oxford University
Outline • MOND as a replacement for DM (Sanders & McGaugh 02) • Absence of DM interior to the Sun (Bissantz et al 03, 04) • TeVeS Lorentz-covariant MOND (Bekenstein 2004)
NGC 3198 Begeman (1987)
Modifying gravity • Modify Newtonian theory at large distances? or at low accelerations?
Deep MOND regime – when µ(x)~x At large r always enter deep MOND Tully-Fisher Sanders & Verheijen
Fits to vc(r) for both LSB & HSB Galaxies (Sanders & McGaugh 02) a0=1.2 10-8 cm s-2 a0~H0c/2π; Λ~3(a0/c)2
U Maj Sanders & Verheijen
Recover predicted M/L values Data: Sanders & Verheijen Models: Bell & de Jong 01
dSph galaxies η = Fi/Ft
DM in the MW? • Bissantz & Gerhard (02) Determine near-IR luminosity density from COBE K & L photometry • Advances previous work by including spiral structure in disk • Bissantz Englmaier & Gerhard (03) study gas flow in Φ obtained with spatially const M/L + quasi-isothermal DM halo • Fit M/L, ωbar, ωspiral • M/L for stars set by dynamics of non-axisymmetric structure • DM halo makes up balance for terminal-velocity curve
Bissantz Englmaier & Gerhard CO observed simulated
Bissantz Englmaier & Gerhard (03) • Find ωbar in good agreement solar nhd kinematics • With 4 arms get good pattern of ridge lines • Vc near sun only ~185km/s unless add DM halo with a=10.7 kpc
Famaey & Binney 05 • Replace BEG halo with MOND? • Predict vc(R) for 2 choices • (x)=x/(1+x2)1/2 or • (x)=x/(1+x)
Cannot get vc(R0)=220 km/s • But vc(R0) not well determined • Can fit terminal velocities for range of models • Bottom lines: (a) vc(R0)<210 km/s (b) v1=170§5 km/s
Microlensing • Microlensing optical depth measures only stellar density
Optical depths Bissantz & Gerhard (02)
Bissantz Debattista & Gerhard (04) • Use novel N-body technique to find dynamical model that reproduces Bissantz & Gerhard photometry • Adopt M/L, ω normalization from BEG • No free parameters in Φ • Reproduce proper motions of bulge stars in Baade’s window etc • For plausible mass function of stars, reproduce MACHO microlensing event duration distribution
Conclusion: stars-only MW gives good fits to both optical depth & duration distribution (ML<,ML>)=(.04,10) or (.075,10)
Klypin et al (02) • ΛCDM models of MW • Adiabatic compression & optional L exchange No L exchange L exchange
TeVeS • Bekenstein (04) presents Lorentz-covariant theory (TeVeS) that reduces to MOND in appropriate limit
Standard cosmologies • Grav. Lensing as if DM present • No superluminal modes
TeVeS important development Link to effective field theory? • Can now extend MOND to CMB and large-scale structure • If not worse than CDM in these fields, must be favoured theory • Then question: significance of Uµ and Φ fields in TeVeS
Conclusions • MOND has amazing ability to model data taken after it was invented • Excellent fits to galaxy rotation curves require M/L(colour) as from SS theory • Compelling evidence that negligible DM interior to Sun • Now limiting form of Lorentz covariant theory • MOND really might be the next great step in physics
Giant E galaxies Data: Romanowsky et al 03 Models: Milgrom & Sanders 03 Solid: isotropic