1 / 31

Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations

Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations. Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University. Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13, SERA-6 June 22-25 2008. Basis of Soil P and K Testing Use. Soil test correlation and calibration

Download Presentation

Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Long-Term Soil P and K Trends inRelation to Nutrient Removal inCorn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13, SERA-6June 22-25 2008

  2. Basis of Soil P and K Testing Use • Soil test correlation and calibration • Interpretation: interpretation categories • Fertilizer recommendations • Response-based and often some buildup for the low-testing categories, those with high probability of response. • Maintenance of desirable soil-test levels, those with low probability of response. Based on nutrient removal and/or empirical data.

  3. Removal-Based P and K Maintenance Example from Iowa Pounds per unit of yield Crop Unit of Yield P O K O 2 5 2 Corn bu 0.375 0.30 Corn silage bu grain equiv. 0.55 1.25 Corn silage 3.50 8.0 ton, 65% H2O Soybean bu 0.80 1.5 Oat and straw bu 0.40 1.0 Oat straw ton 5.0 33.0 Wheat bu 0.60 0.30 Alfalfa ton 12.5 40.0 Red clover ton 12.0 35.0 Pm-1688 pub, ISU

  4. Some Relevant Questions • Are assumed buildup and maintenance rate appropriate? • Does maintenance make sense? What level should be maintained? • Does removal-based fertilization really maintain STP and STK levels? • How do yield, removal, and soil-test values in the short term and long term? • What are the impacts of wrong yield and nutrient concentration estimates?

  5. Long Term Studies in Iowa • 5 trials for P, 12 years each, no-till • 5 trials for K, 10 years each, no-till • Corn/Soybean rotations, both crops each year on adjacent identical trials • 3 P rates: 0, 14, and 28 kg P/ha • 3 K rates: 0, 33, and 66 kg P/ha • Broadcast and band placement methods • Measured yield from all plots and soil tests for the control and the high rate

  6. Soils and Properties

  7. POTASSIUM

  8. Soybean Long-Term Trends

  9. Corn Long-Term Trends

  10. Average Relative Responses

  11. Soil-Test K Long-Term Trends

  12. K Removal & Post-Harvest STK

  13. Grain K Concentration and Yield Avg = 1.2 lb K2O/bu Current (dry basis) = 1.7 lb K2O/bu

  14. Grain K Concentration and Yield Avg = 0.22 lb K2O/bu Current (dry basis) = 0.35 lb K2O/bu

  15. K Removal and Yield

  16. K Removal and Yield

  17. PHOSPHORUS

  18. P Soybean: Yield Trends

  19. P Corn: Yield Trends

  20. P Average Relative Responses

  21. Mean = 0.57% Avg = 0.78 lb P2O5/bu Current (dry basis) = 0.92 lb P2O5/bu Grain P Concentration & Yield

  22. Mean = 0.24% Avg = 0.31 lb P2O5/bu Current (dry basis) = 0.44 lb P2O5/bu Grain P Concentration & Yield

  23. Grain P Removal and Yield

  24. Grain P Removal and Yield

  25. Soil-Test P Trends Over Time

  26. P Removal & Post-Harvest STP

  27. Cumulative P Removal & Soil P Averages of Non-Fertilized Plots Across Locations 47 lb P2O5/acre/year for 1 ppm/year decrease

  28. P Removal & Soil P Increase Averages of Fertilized Plots Across Locations

  29. Grain Yield and Concentrations • Crop yields vary greatly across field and years. We overestimated yield, as most farmers do with yield goals. • Grain P and K concentration also vary across field and years • Estimates of P and K concentration in grain were much higher than observed averages. • Increased up to a certain plateau with the fertilizer rate and soil-test values • Grain P and K concentrations were not correlated with yield level across sites.

  30. Removal and Soil Test Values • Our overestimation of yield levels and nutrient concentrations resulted in a significant overestimation of removal. • Removal was well reflected on soil-test values in the long term, but very poorly or not at all in the short term • slow P recycling of residue P and K? • slow equilibria between soil P and K pools?

  31. Implications for Management • Major errors at estimating P and K removal is caused by error in grain yield estimates. • Removal-based P and K maintenance based on good yield and concentration estimates maintain or only slightly increase soil-test P and K it over time. • Removal-based maintenance rates must be based on yield averages over time, not from year to year changes.

More Related