1 / 20

NLC work for ILC BDS design

NLC work for ILC BDS design. review what has been done by O.Napoly, J.Payet, D. Angal-Kalinin et. al and what we can do. A.S., September 7, 2004. Study collimator survivability of NLC BDS with 3.5m L* for ILC parameters, determine minimum beam sizes at spoilers in ILC BDS - Lew

quito
Download Presentation

NLC work for ILC BDS design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NLC work for ILC BDS design review what has been done by O.Napoly, J.Payet, D. Angal-Kalinin et. al and what we can do A.S., September 7, 2004

  2. Study collimator survivability of NLC BDS with 3.5m L* for ILC parameters, determine minimum beam sizes at spoilers in ILC BDS - Lew • Study existing ILC BDS optics and crossing schemes solutions - A.S., Tom • Design optimized ILC optics (based on NLC) with optimal collimators, L* 4.2 and 5m and tail folding - A.S. • Accommodate Geant model of SiD and/or LD detectors to ILC IR parameters, find or build Geant model of ILC/Tesla detector - Takashi • Study halo performance of new ILC BDS with Turtle and Geant - Lew, Takashi • Optimize collimator gaps and photon masks location in new ILC BDS - Lew, Takashi • Study collimator wake-field performance of ILC BDS - P.T. • Review Brett's linac dump design, if acceptable and no redesign needed, modify to include second order dispersion correction - Mark • Design 30m FFS optics for demonstration at ATF - Mauro, A.S. • Start work on pair monitor distribution analysis with realistic beams and various crossing angle (continue work of Achim Stahl) - Glen • Study realistic ILC BDS tuning with errors and misalignment - Yuri • Continue fast feedback optimization (s-shaped bunch question), and include collimator and resistive wakes - Glen • Extraction line design - Yuri • ILC Detector solenoid field optimization and compensation - Yuri, A.S.

  3. Saclay, Daresbury work • BDS optics design • NLC style • Hybrid style (NLC style for Y, traditional for X) • Design for L* of 3,4,5m • Collimation requirement evaluation • Constraint to preserve head on option => ~250m free straight path till beamstrahlung dump • Collimation redesign (2nd energy slit) • Opposite FD acceptance => FF w. Final Quadruplet • Octupole folding being designed? (not reported yet)

  4. Next: Slides from O.Napoly, J.Payet, April 2003 and January 2004

  5. Hybrid Correction, l*=5m Beamstrahlung Dump SH SH SV2 SV1 IP angular dispersion, D’x* = 2.6 mrad

  6. NLC type correction, l*=5m Beamstrahlung Dump SF3 SF2 SF1, SD1 SD2 IP angular dispersion D’x* = 10 mrad

  7. Collimation • requirements • for • l* = 5m • Φ = 48 mm • inner mask • - s = 4 m • - Φ = 24 mm 1st order transport • new collimation section required with tail folding by octupoles

  8. The collimation section • We use the TDR collimation section with some changes : • Reverse the first • dispersion bump • Introduce a second • energy spoiler • (ΔΨx =2 between • the 2 energy spoilers)

  9. NLC-like optics : Central trajectories

  10. NLC-like optics Hybrid optics Betatron spoilers : gx = 1.8 & 1.2 mm gy = 0.7 mm Energy spoilers : gx = 0.9 & 0.7 mm Momentum acceptance : -0.42 % , +0.57 % all δ-order transport Betatron spoilers : gx = 1.8 & 1.3 mm gy = 0.7 mm Energy spoilers : gx = 0.8 mm Momentum acceptance : -0.39 % , +0.52 %

  11. Next: Compilation from O.Napoly, J.Payet, April 2003, R.Appleby, D.Angal-Kalinin,O.Napoly, J.Payet, LCWS 2004 New: Daresbury group modified FF optics to use Final Quadruplet => improve extracted line acceptance for head on or small vertical x-ing. Some consideration of small horizontal x-ing.

  12. φ* Beam Extraction • Final doublet acceptance • Θ*max(E,φ*) • with • l* = 5m • Φ = 48 mm • Solenoid BS = 4 T

  13. [R. Brinkmann] Beam Sizes for –40% energy tail particles at MSEP (~50 m from IP) in the extraction line: With doublet With quadruplet

  14. Could this be used for TESLA ?

  15. Next: Slide from K.Busser, LCWS 2004 IR design for L* > 4.05m Last week A.Stahl was suggesting that > 4.2m is needed?

  16. Proposed Design for l* ≥ 4.05 m Design by Achim Stahl

  17. End of quoted slides

  18. Impression on optics • Hybrid optics may be unusable with tail folding • Present NLC-like design may be not optimized for tail folding • What seem to be missing (perhaps work is ongoing) • detailed analysis of collimation performance • design and performance of tail fording • collimator wakes analysis • detailed analysis of small H or V crossing angle • Impression on x-ing angle schemes • small horizontal x-ing has less chances than small vertical x-ing • the latter depends on crab cavity and electrostatic separator experimental tests

  19. BDS design work, assumption • head-on remain an option until experiments show performance of crab cavity and electrostatic separator • Design two BDS versions with head-on constraints and without • complete design, with collimator and tail folding and performance study • design two version of collimation – passive survival and consumable ? • Study IR background with small and large x-ing schemes • Extraction schemes…

  20. 90deg. The NLC b-collimation is optimized for consumable spoilers. Beam size in SP1,3 and SP2,4 cannot be increases simultaneously. To achieve passive survival, would need to change to 45deg and twice more cells

More Related