1 / 52

Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer

Indications for radical cystectomy. Infiltrating muscle-invasive bladder cancer without evidence of metastasis or with low-volume, resectable locoregional metastases (stage T2-T3b) Superficial bladder tumors characterized by any of the following: Refractory to cystoscopic resection and intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy Extensive disease not amenable to cystoscopic resection Invasive prostatic urethral involvementStage-pT1, grade-3 tumors unresponsive to intravesical BCG vaccine the30210

rae
Download Presentation

Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer Ganesh V. Raj MD, PhD

    2. Indications for radical cystectomy Infiltrating muscle-invasive bladder cancer without evidence of metastasis or with low-volume, resectable locoregional metastases (stage T2-T3b) Superficial bladder tumors characterized by any of the following: Refractory to cystoscopic resection and intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy Extensive disease not amenable to cystoscopic resection Invasive prostatic urethral involvement Stage-pT1, grade-3 tumors unresponsive to intravesical BCG vaccine therapy CIS refractory to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy Palliation for pain, bleeding, or urinary frequency Primary adenocarcinoma, SCC, or sarcoma

    4. Radical cystectomy: evolution More than removing just the bladder (simple cystectomy) First performed in 1800s for bladder cancer 1948, landmark report showed a 47% incidence of local recurrence within 1 year and 33% mortality after recurrent disease within 1-2 years Overall outcomes of patients undergoing simple cystectomies were poor.

    5. Modern Radical Cystectomy Radical Cystectomy Removal of bladder with surrounding fat Prostate/seminal vesicles (males) Uterus/fallopian tubes/ovaries/cervix (females) + Urethrectomy Pelvic Lymphadenectomy More is better Urinary Diversion Ileal conduit Continent cutaneous reservoir Orthotopic neobladder Surgery for bladder cancer can really be divided into 3 main components: First, the radical cystectomy which is removal of the bladder with its surrounding fat. In males that also routinely includes the prostate and seminal vesicles, and in women, the uterus, cervix, tubes, and ovaries. Depending on the stage of disease, the urethra may also need to be removed. The removal of the pelvic lymph nodes is also a critical component to the completeness of the surgical resection. And finally, the urinary diversion which typically has the most direct impact on the patient’s quality of life.Surgery for bladder cancer can really be divided into 3 main components: First, the radical cystectomy which is removal of the bladder with its surrounding fat. In males that also routinely includes the prostate and seminal vesicles, and in women, the uterus, cervix, tubes, and ovaries. Depending on the stage of disease, the urethra may also need to be removed. The removal of the pelvic lymph nodes is also a critical component to the completeness of the surgical resection. And finally, the urinary diversion which typically has the most direct impact on the patient’s quality of life.

    7. Radical Cystectomy Midline incision Thorough intraabdominal exploration (rule out metastatic disease) Assess resectability of bladder The radical cystectomy is performed through a long midline incision. This allows for a thorough intraabdominal exploration to first rule out any obvious metastatic spread which might not have been evident on the preoperative imaging studies. It also allows direct assessment of the bladder to ensure that it can be safely removed.The radical cystectomy is performed through a long midline incision. This allows for a thorough intraabdominal exploration to first rule out any obvious metastatic spread which might not have been evident on the preoperative imaging studies. It also allows direct assessment of the bladder to ensure that it can be safely removed.

    8. Radical cystectomy made ridiculously simple: 8 easy steps

    17. Radical Cystectomy OUTCOMES Based on one of the largest experiences from the University of Southern California, looking at over 1000 patients, we know that about 35-40% will develop a recurrence of the disease after surgery. Most of these recurrences will become evident within the first 3 yrs after surgery. Usually the cancer shows up at a distant site such as the liver or lungs, and unfortunately, despite our advances in chemotherapy, most of these patients will eventually die from their disease.Based on one of the largest experiences from the University of Southern California, looking at over 1000 patients, we know that about 35-40% will develop a recurrence of the disease after surgery. Most of these recurrences will become evident within the first 3 yrs after surgery. Usually the cancer shows up at a distant site such as the liver or lungs, and unfortunately, despite our advances in chemotherapy, most of these patients will eventually die from their disease.

    18. Radical Cystectomy OUTCOMES The most important prognostic factor after surgery is the stage of disease. Those who have a tumor that is confined to the bladder have about an 80% chance of being cured of their disease. When the cancer extends outside of the capsule of the bladder to involve the surrounding fat, that cure rate goes down to about 50%, and when there is spread to the lymph nodes, only about 20% will be cured.The most important prognostic factor after surgery is the stage of disease. Those who have a tumor that is confined to the bladder have about an 80% chance of being cured of their disease. When the cancer extends outside of the capsule of the bladder to involve the surrounding fat, that cure rate goes down to about 50%, and when there is spread to the lymph nodes, only about 20% will be cured.

    19. Impact of Surgical Technique on Outcomes More extended lymph nodes dissection = better outcomes More lymph nodes removed = better outcomes Lower positive margin rate = better outcomes More experienced surgeons = better outcomes

    21. Pelvic Lymphadenectomy One of the current controversies in the Urologic community is what is the optimal extent of the lymph node dissection. For a long time, the standard dissection would include only the lower pelvic nodes directly around the bladder. Several studies have recently supported a more extended dissection to include the nodes around the lower portions of the aorta and inferior vena cava.One of the current controversies in the Urologic community is what is the optimal extent of the lymph node dissection. For a long time, the standard dissection would include only the lower pelvic nodes directly around the bladder. Several studies have recently supported a more extended dissection to include the nodes around the lower portions of the aorta and inferior vena cava.

    22. Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ~25% have LN involvement at cystectomy Accurate staging Assessment of prognosis Adjuvant therapies (chemotherapy, clinical trials) Therapeutic benefit Removal of micrometastatic disease Despite our CT scans and MRI’s, still about 25% of patients who go into surgery without any evidence of spread outside of the bladder will be found to have positive lymph nodes once the specimen is analyzed. A properly performed pelvic lymphadenectomy provides accurate staging and therefore a better idea of the prognosis. Those patients with lymph node involvement should be considered for other treatments such as chemotherapy or inclusion in clinical trials. It was once thought that once the tumor had spread to the lymph nodes, that “the cat was out of the bag” so to speak and that there was little benefit to doing a thorough lymph node removal. However, there is now increasing evidence to suggest that there is a therapeutic benefit to removing these nodes and that some patients can be cured of their disease with surgery.Despite our CT scans and MRI’s, still about 25% of patients who go into surgery without any evidence of spread outside of the bladder will be found to have positive lymph nodes once the specimen is analyzed. A properly performed pelvic lymphadenectomy provides accurate staging and therefore a better idea of the prognosis. Those patients with lymph node involvement should be considered for other treatments such as chemotherapy or inclusion in clinical trials. It was once thought that once the tumor had spread to the lymph nodes, that “the cat was out of the bag” so to speak and that there was little benefit to doing a thorough lymph node removal. However, there is now increasing evidence to suggest that there is a therapeutic benefit to removing these nodes and that some patients can be cured of their disease with surgery.

    25. Number of Nodes Sampled Affects Survival in Both Node Negative and Node Positive Patients This important paper from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center clearly shows how the number of nodes removed affects survival probability in both node negative and node positive patients. In apparently node negative patients, the sensitivity of detecting node metastases will be lowered with a more limited node dissection yielding fewer nodes or the pathologists failure to examine all potential node bearing tissue and the nodes contained in that tissue. In node positive patients the number of positive nods has a significant impact on outcome.This important paper from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center clearly shows how the number of nodes removed affects survival probability in both node negative and node positive patients. In apparently node negative patients, the sensitivity of detecting node metastases will be lowered with a more limited node dissection yielding fewer nodes or the pathologists failure to examine all potential node bearing tissue and the nodes contained in that tissue. In node positive patients the number of positive nods has a significant impact on outcome.

    26. Modifications in technique Nerve sparing for potency Prostate sparing Gynecologic organ sparing Anterior vaginal wall sparing Urethral sparing in women Urethral sparing in men

    27. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Highly recommended But chemo has toxicity Do all patients with T1 bladder cancer need neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Do all patients with T2 bladder cancer need neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Do all patients with T3 bladder cancer need neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

    31. Urinary Diversion Use of intestinal segment to bypass/ reconstruct/ replace the normal urinary tract Goals: Storage of urine without absorption Maintain low pressure even at high volumes to allow unobstructed flow of urine from kidneys Prevent reflux of urine back to the kidneys Socially-acceptable continence Empties completely “Ideal” diversion has yet to be discovered Now for the part of the talk that I think most of you are interested in- the urinary diversion. This is basically using a portion of the intestine to bypass, reconstruct, or replace the normal urinary tract. The goals of a urinary diversion are straight forward: To store urine without absorption of the waste products. To store that urine at low pressures so that the urine can continue to drain from the kidneys. To prevent reflux of urine back into the kidneys. To hold on to the urine until it is socially-acceptable to empty, and then to empty completely. If you think about it, this is what our normal bladders do everyday. Having said that, the ideal form of diversion has yet to be discovered. Now for the part of the talk that I think most of you are interested in- the urinary diversion. This is basically using a portion of the intestine to bypass, reconstruct, or replace the normal urinary tract. The goals of a urinary diversion are straight forward: To store urine without absorption of the waste products. To store that urine at low pressures so that the urine can continue to drain from the kidneys. To prevent reflux of urine back into the kidneys. To hold on to the urine until it is socially-acceptable to empty, and then to empty completely. If you think about it, this is what our normal bladders do everyday. Having said that, the ideal form of diversion has yet to be discovered.

    32. Types of Urinary Diversion There are 3 main types of diversions practiced at this time. The ileal conduit which is an incontinent diversion to the skin. This is also known as a urostomy in which an external bag collects the urine continuously. Beginning in the 1980’s we started performing more complex reconstructions, in which a continent reservoir was constructed with an opening to the skin which would then have to be catheterized in order to empty. And it really wasn’t until the 1990’s that the neobladder became popular, which is a continent diversion connected to the native urethra.There are 3 main types of diversions practiced at this time. The ileal conduit which is an incontinent diversion to the skin. This is also known as a urostomy in which an external bag collects the urine continuously. Beginning in the 1980’s we started performing more complex reconstructions, in which a continent reservoir was constructed with an opening to the skin which would then have to be catheterized in order to empty. And it really wasn’t until the 1990’s that the neobladder became popular, which is a continent diversion connected to the native urethra.

    33. Ileal Conduit 15-20 cm of small intestine (ileum) is separated from the intestinal tract Intestines are sewn back together (re-establish intestinal continuity) The ileal conduit is created from 15-20 cm of small intestine (ileum). This segment of intestine is separated from the rest of the intestinal tract. The intestines are obviously sewn back together so that one can still have bowel movements.The ileal conduit is created from 15-20 cm of small intestine (ileum). This segment of intestine is separated from the rest of the intestinal tract. The intestines are obviously sewn back together so that one can still have bowel movements.

    34. Ileal Conduit Ureters are attached to one end of the segment of ileum Natural peristalsis of intestine propels urine through the segment Other end is brought out through an opening on the abdomen The ureters that drain the kidneys are then sewn into one end of the ileum. And the other end is brought up to an opening on the abdomen as a stoma. The intestine naturally has a propulsive movement, almost like a snake, that normally would be moving food through the GI tract, but in this instance, is pushing the urine through the segment and out of the body.The ureters that drain the kidneys are then sewn into one end of the ileum. And the other end is brought up to an opening on the abdomen as a stoma. The intestine naturally has a propulsive movement, almost like a snake, that normally would be moving food through the GI tract, but in this instance, is pushing the urine through the segment and out of the body.

    37. Ileal Conduit ADVANTAGES Simplest to perform Least potential for complications No need for intermittent catheterization Less absorption of urine DISADVANTAGES Need to wear an external collection bag Stoma complications Parastomal hernia Stomal stenosis Long-term sequelae Pyelonephritis Renal deterioration So for each of these diversions, I’m going to give you a breakdown of the advantages and disadvantages. For the conduit, the advantage is that it is simple to perform. Arguably, it has the least potential for complications. There is no need for catheterization, and because of the movement of the intestine, there is less time for absorption of the urine in the intestine. The disadvantages are that you need to wear an external collection bag. There can be problems with the stoma- either a hernia or scarring making it difficult for the urine to pass. Some long-term problems that have been noted include risks of infections and decreased function of the kidneys after many years.So for each of these diversions, I’m going to give you a breakdown of the advantages and disadvantages. For the conduit, the advantage is that it is simple to perform. Arguably, it has the least potential for complications. There is no need for catheterization, and because of the movement of the intestine, there is less time for absorption of the urine in the intestine. The disadvantages are that you need to wear an external collection bag. There can be problems with the stoma- either a hernia or scarring making it difficult for the urine to pass. Some long-term problems that have been noted include risks of infections and decreased function of the kidneys after many years.

    38. Continent Cutaneous Reservoir Many variations (same theme) Indiana Pouch, Penn Pouch, Kock Pouch… All use various parts of the intestine ileum, right colon most commonly Reservoir “Detubularized” intestine- low pressure storage Continence mechanism Ileocecal valve (Indiana) Flap valve (Penn, Lahey) Intussuscepted nipple valve (Kock) For the continent cutaneous reservoir- These go by many names with slight variations but all with a similar theme. You may hear these referred to as an Indiana pouch, or a Kock pouch. All use various parts of the intestine, most commonly the ileum and right colon. The intestine is detubularized to create a low pressure storage reservoir. The main difference between these pouches are in terms of how they provide continence. The Indiana uses the natural valve between the small and large intestine called the ileocecal valve. This normally prevents the stool in the colon from backing up into the small intestine. A variety of other techniques have been created to also prevent leakage from the reservoir, including flap valves and nipple valves.For the continent cutaneous reservoir- These go by many names with slight variations but all with a similar theme. You may hear these referred to as an Indiana pouch, or a Kock pouch. All use various parts of the intestine, most commonly the ileum and right colon. The intestine is detubularized to create a low pressure storage reservoir. The main difference between these pouches are in terms of how they provide continence. The Indiana uses the natural valve between the small and large intestine called the ileocecal valve. This normally prevents the stool in the colon from backing up into the small intestine. A variety of other techniques have been created to also prevent leakage from the reservoir, including flap valves and nipple valves.

    39. Continent Cutaneous Reservoir INDIANA POUCH The Indiana Pouch is probably the most commonly used cutaneous reservoir. Here, the right colon and ileum are isolated. The appendix is removed. The right colon is opened lengthwise and folded down to create a sphere.The Indiana Pouch is probably the most commonly used cutaneous reservoir. Here, the right colon and ileum are isolated. The appendix is removed. The right colon is opened lengthwise and folded down to create a sphere.

    40. Continent Cutaneous Reservoir INDIANA POUCH The ureters are attached to the back of the reservoir and the ileum becomes that efferent limb that is brought up to the skin opening. Continence is maintained by this one way ileocecal valve. So that the only way to empty the reservoir is by passing a catheter through the skin opening through the efferent limb (or ileum) and into the pouch. This needs to be done at regular intervals throughout the day, usually every 4-6 hours.The ureters are attached to the back of the reservoir and the ileum becomes that efferent limb that is brought up to the skin opening. Continence is maintained by this one way ileocecal valve. So that the only way to empty the reservoir is by passing a catheter through the skin opening through the efferent limb (or ileum) and into the pouch. This needs to be done at regular intervals throughout the day, usually every 4-6 hours.

    42. Continent Cutaneous Reservoir ADVANTAGES No external bag Stoma can be covered with bandaid DISADVANTAGES Most complex Need for regular intermittent catheterization Potential complications: Stoma stenosis Stones Urine infections The main advantage of this type of reservoir is that no external bag is needed. The stoma can be covered with a bandaid. The disadvantages can be quite significant. It is much more complex to create than the ileal conduit. It does require regular intermittent catheterization every 4-6 hours. There are potential for complications with scarring at the stoma making it difficult to catheterize. Urine infections and stones can form within the reservoir since the urine is sitting in there for longer periods of time.The main advantage of this type of reservoir is that no external bag is needed. The stoma can be covered with a bandaid. The disadvantages can be quite significant. It is much more complex to create than the ileal conduit. It does require regular intermittent catheterization every 4-6 hours. There are potential for complications with scarring at the stoma making it difficult to catheterize. Urine infections and stones can form within the reservoir since the urine is sitting in there for longer periods of time.

    43. Orthotopic Neobladder Currently the diversion of choice Studer, T-Pouch, Hautmann, Ghoniem, etc. COMPONENTS: Internal reservoir – detubularized ileum Connect to urethra (“efferent limb”) Urethral sphincter provides continence “Afferent Limb” – ureteral connection Antirefluxing (T-Pouch, Kock) Low pressure isoperistaltic limb (Studer) Just as with the catheterizable cutaneous diversions, there are a number of different type of neobladders, though all are based on the same principles. The internal reservoir is created from detubularized intestine. The continence mechanism here is the body’s own urethral sphincter that we naturally depend upon for our urine control normally. The main differences between the various neobladders is how the ureters are attached to the reservoir.Just as with the catheterizable cutaneous diversions, there are a number of different type of neobladders, though all are based on the same principles. The internal reservoir is created from detubularized intestine. The continence mechanism here is the body’s own urethral sphincter that we naturally depend upon for our urine control normally. The main differences between the various neobladders is how the ureters are attached to the reservoir.

    44. Orthotopic Neobladder The most commonly performed neobladder is called the Studer neobladder after a European urologist. 44 cm of ileum is set aside for the reservoir and an additional 15-20 cm is for the afferent limb. The ureters are attached to this afferent limb which then drains down into the detubularized 44 cm reservoir, which is then connected to the urethra.The most commonly performed neobladder is called the Studer neobladder after a European urologist. 44 cm of ileum is set aside for the reservoir and an additional 15-20 cm is for the afferent limb. The ureters are attached to this afferent limb which then drains down into the detubularized 44 cm reservoir, which is then connected to the urethra.

    45. Orthotopic Neobladder This is how it looks in the operating room. The intestine is separated from the rest of the intestinal tractThis is how it looks in the operating room. The intestine is separated from the rest of the intestinal tract

    46. Orthotopic Neobladder The lower 44 cm portion is opened up and fashioned into a patch.The lower 44 cm portion is opened up and fashioned into a patch.

    47. Orthotopic Neobladder This patch is then folded and closed to become a sphere. And this is the finished product. The ureters are sewn into the afferent limb on the left and the other end is sewn to the urethra.This patch is then folded and closed to become a sphere. And this is the finished product. The ureters are sewn into the afferent limb on the left and the other end is sewn to the urethra.

    49. Orthotopic Neobladder ADVANTAGES No external bag Urinate through urethra May not need catheterization DISADVANTAGES Incontinence (10-30%) Retention (5-20%) Risk of stones, UTI’s Need to “train” neobladder The advantages: no external bag, ability to urinate through the urethra, and you may not need to do any catheterization. There are significant risks of incontinence (10-30%) which would require pads. There is also a risk of retention of urine that might require intermittent catheterization, which appears to be higher in females for whatever reason. Similar to the Indiana Pouch, there is a risk of stone and UTI’s. It does take some effort to train the neobladder. Patients do need to be very motivated to learn to urinate at regular intervals, practice exercises to control the urine, and to basically learn how to empty the neobladder through a combination of pelvic floor relaxation and abdominal straining. The advantages: no external bag, ability to urinate through the urethra, and you may not need to do any catheterization. There are significant risks of incontinence (10-30%) which would require pads. There is also a risk of retention of urine that might require intermittent catheterization, which appears to be higher in females for whatever reason. Similar to the Indiana Pouch, there is a risk of stone and UTI’s. It does take some effort to train the neobladder. Patients do need to be very motivated to learn to urinate at regular intervals, practice exercises to control the urine, and to basically learn how to empty the neobladder through a combination of pelvic floor relaxation and abdominal straining.

    50. Choice of Urinary Diversion Disease Factors Urethral margin Patient Factors Kidney function / liver function Manual dexterity Preoperative urinary continence/ urethral strictures Motivation Surgeon Factors Familiarity with various types of diversions With all of these options, how does one decide. Well, I think there are really 3 main factors that go into the decision. First is the bladder cancer itself. If the cancer involves the urethra, it does not make sense to create a fancy diversion and connect it to any area where there is cancer. So, if the urethra is involved, the urethra is removed and one of the skin diversions is performed. Secondly, patient factors are clearly important. Due to the potential for absorption of the urine through the intestine, a continent diversion requires normal kidney and liver function to compensate. Good manual dexterity is needed for diversions that may require intermittent catheterization. It’s good to know if there are any preexisting problems with the urethra or urinary sphincter when considering a neobladder. The continent diversions do require a bit of work and patients do need to be motivated to take care of themselves, catheterize when needed, and to be diligent about medical followup to prevent problems down the road. And finally, the surgeon’s familiarity and experience will also play into the choice of diversion.With all of these options, how does one decide. Well, I think there are really 3 main factors that go into the decision. First is the bladder cancer itself. If the cancer involves the urethra, it does not make sense to create a fancy diversion and connect it to any area where there is cancer. So, if the urethra is involved, the urethra is removed and one of the skin diversions is performed. Secondly, patient factors are clearly important. Due to the potential for absorption of the urine through the intestine, a continent diversion requires normal kidney and liver function to compensate. Good manual dexterity is needed for diversions that may require intermittent catheterization. It’s good to know if there are any preexisting problems with the urethra or urinary sphincter when considering a neobladder. The continent diversions do require a bit of work and patients do need to be motivated to take care of themselves, catheterize when needed, and to be diligent about medical followup to prevent problems down the road. And finally, the surgeon’s familiarity and experience will also play into the choice of diversion.

    51. Urinary Diversions Enterostomal therapist is CRITICAL for success Urinary diversions require lifelong follow-up Imaging (kidneys/ureters/diversion) Labs (electrolytes, acid-base, B12 levels) Cancer follow-up (surveillance imaging, cytology) One of the keys to success is having a dedicated enterostomal therapist or nurse specialist who can work with patients both before and after surgery. I’ve been very fortunate at Loyola to have Ginger Lewis who is an incredible resource for my patients and who has been instrumental in leading our active bladder cancer support group. All of these urinary diversions require lifelong followup. This includes periodic imaging of the kidneys, ureters, and diversion, regular blood work, as well as the routine follow-up for surveillance of the cancer.One of the keys to success is having a dedicated enterostomal therapist or nurse specialist who can work with patients both before and after surgery. I’ve been very fortunate at Loyola to have Ginger Lewis who is an incredible resource for my patients and who has been instrumental in leading our active bladder cancer support group. All of these urinary diversions require lifelong followup. This includes periodic imaging of the kidneys, ureters, and diversion, regular blood work, as well as the routine follow-up for surveillance of the cancer.

    52. Conclusions Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for invasive bladder cancer Accurate staging (after surgery) is the most important determinant of prognosis A properly performed lymph node dissection makes a difference Choice of urinary diversion must be individualized for optimal outcomes In conclusion, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for invasive bladder cancer. Accurate staging is the most important determinant of prognosis. A properly performed lymph node dissection makes a difference. And finally, the choice of urinary diversion must be individualized for optimal outcomes. Thank you.In conclusion, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for invasive bladder cancer. Accurate staging is the most important determinant of prognosis. A properly performed lymph node dissection makes a difference. And finally, the choice of urinary diversion must be individualized for optimal outcomes. Thank you.

    53. New Frontiers Laparoscopic cystectomy Robotic cystectomy with intracoporeal diversion

More Related