1 / 44

Structural Modeling of Post-Tensioning Tendons Dr. Bijan O. Aalami

Structural Modeling of Post-Tensioning Tendons Dr. Bijan O. Aalami Emeritus Professor, San Francisco State University Principal, ADAPT Corporation, Redwood City, Ca. FLAT DUCT GROUTED POST-TENSIONING. Ngee Ann City, Singapore - BBR. UNBONDED POST-TENSIONING CONSTRUCTION.

rafiki
Download Presentation

Structural Modeling of Post-Tensioning Tendons Dr. Bijan O. Aalami

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Structural Modeling of Post-Tensioning Tendons Dr. Bijan O. Aalami Emeritus Professor, San Francisco State University Principal, ADAPT Corporation, Redwood City, Ca

  2. FLAT DUCT GROUTED POST-TENSIONING Ngee Ann City, Singapore - BBR

  3. UNBONDED POST-TENSIONING CONSTRUCTION Red Lion Inn Hotel Modesto, California

  4. GENERIC ANCHORAGE DEVICE ( 5") 127mm 57mm ( 2.25") (a) PLAN 38mm ( 1.50") (b) SECTION 33mm ( 1.30") (c) WEDGE

  5. UNBONDED TENDON ANCHOR DEVICE ASSEMBLY 12.7 mm (0.5"*) PLASTIC CORROSION WIRE SHEATHING INHIBITING COATING NOTE: * NOMINAL DIAMETER (a) STRAND (b) TENDON GREASE FILLED PLASTIC CAP TUBE SHEATH STRAND (c) ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY

  6. ARRANGEMENT OF UNBONDED POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM

  7. FUNCTION OF POST-TENSIONING TENDON • Uplift • Counteract selfweight • Precompression • Mitigate cracking • Reduce Deflection • Add Strength

  8. Prestressing Tendon’s Contribution depends on: • Local stress in tendon • At service condition • At strength limit state • Profile of tendon (geometry) • Tendon Cross Section

  9. CRITICAL CONSIDERATION IN STRUCTURAL MODELING OF TENDONS • Immediate loss of stress • Friction loss • Seating loss (draw-in) • Elastic shortening • Long-term losses • Relaxation in prestressing • Shrinkage in concrete • Creep in concrete • Others, such as • Change in stress due to flexing of member under applied loading • Aging of concrete • Temperature

  10. LOSS OF PRESTRESSING FORCE DUE TO FRICTION AND SEATING STRESSING END TENDON DEAD END (a) TENDON GEOMETRY F AVERAGE FORCE F TENDON FORCE o F x x (b) TENDON FORCE PROFILE

  11. TENDON MODELING • As an Applied Loading • As a Load Resisting Element

  12. TENDON MODELING AS APPLIED LOADING • Simple load balancing [T Y Lin, 1981] • Extended Load Balancing [Aalami, 1990] • Modeling Through Primary Moments • Modeling Through Equivalent Forces

  13. 15 kN/m 11.76 kN/m 97.84 60 151.73 (b) BALANCED LOADING SIMPLE LOAD BALANCING 20m 12m PARABOLIC TENDON 100 1200kN 800 400 400 60 300 700 (a) PROFILE IDEALIZED AS PARABOLA

  14. SIMPLE LOAD BALANCING 1.2 6 10 8 2 4.8 400 400 300 60 700 (a) REVERSED PARABOLA PROFILE 33.33 19.20 8.16 6.67 76.80 40.00 81.60 133.33 (b) BALANCED LOADING

  15. SIMPLE LOAD BALANCING • Constant force • Upward force (w) is given by: w = 8 Pa / L2 P = force in tendon a = tendon drape; and L = span length b b

  16. EXTENDED LOAD BALANCING • Constant force • Recognition and allowance for change in centroidal axis of member

  17. EXTENDED LOAD BALANCING 20m 12m PARABOLIC TENDON 100 1200kN 500 800 250 60 60 400 300 8.58 5.133 (a) MEMBER WITH SHIFT IN CENTROID M=180.00 17.30 11.48 253.38 88.79 95.10 (b) BALANCED LOADING (kN, kNm) • NOTE: Values in mm unless noted otherwise.

  18. TENDON MODELING THROUGH PRIMARY MOMENTS • Generally based on constant force Mp = P *e Mp = primary moment P = tendon force e = tendon eccentricity

  19. MODELING THROUGH PRIMARY MOMENTS 20m 12m PARABOLIC TENDON 100 1200kN 500 800 60 250 60 400 300 (a) MEMBER WITH SHIFT IN CENTROID 228 408 180 360 180 (b) PRIMARY MOMENTS (kNm)

  20. (b) APPLICATION OF PRIMARY MOMENTS AS APPLIED LOADING DISCRETIZATION AND APPLICATION OF PRIMARY MOMENTS AS LOADING APPROXIMATED PRIMARY MOMENT PRIMARY MOMENT M M 2 3 M M 7 8 M 1 M 9 M M 4 6 M 5 (a) DISCRETIZATION OF PRIMARY MOMENTS M 5 M M M M M M M M 6 1 2 3 4 7 8 9

  21. TENDON MODELING THROUGH TENDON DISCRETIZATION AND EQUIVALENT LOADS Accounts for Variable Tendon Force

  22. TENDON REPRESENTATION BY DISCRETIZATION CURVED TENDON (a) ACTUAL GEOMETRY STRAIGHT TENDON SEGMENT ANGULAR CHANGE NODE (b) IDEALIZED TENDON

  23. IDEALIZATION OF TENDON FORCE i-1 i i+1 (a) IDEALIZED TENDON PROFILE WOBBLE LOSS ANGLE CHANGE ACTUAL LOSS (b) DISCRETIZED TENDON FORCE IDEALIZED FORCE ACTUAL (c) TENDON SEGMENT FORCES

  24. F , F = TENDON FORCES i i-1 F , F = TENDON FORCE COMPONENT xi yi ALONG SECTIONS AXIS RESOLUTION OF TENDON ACTIONS AT DISCRETIZATION POINTS i + 1 F i - 1 F i q i-1 i-1 q i x i F xi F yi i = TENDON NODE

  25. EQUIVALENT TENDON ACTIONS AT CENTROIDAL AXES ACTIONS AT CENTROID CENTROIDAL AXIS TENDON NODE IMPRESSION OF REMOVED TENDON

  26. HYPERSTATIC (SECONDARY) ACTIONS DUE TO PRESTRSSING Hyperstatic actions are caused due to constraint of a member to displacement under prestressing forces M = M + M M = post-tensioning moment; M = primary moment; and M = hyperstatic moment p pre hyp pre p hyp

  27. p

  28. TENDON MODELING THROUGH LOAD RESISTING ELEMENT • Variable Force in Tendon • Implicit Accounting for Stress Losses

  29. TWO MODELING OPTIONS FOR PRESTRESSING TENDON SEGMENT (a) SEGMENT ELEVATION REMOVED TENDON TENDON P CENTROIDAL AXIS (b) TENDON AS EXTERNAL (c) TENDON RETAINED FORCE IN SEGMENT I J (d) EQUIVALENT TENDON (e) TENDON AS ELEMENT FORCE ORIGINAL DISPLACED (g) DISPLACED (f) DISPLACED SEGMENT SEGMENT

  30. PRESTRESSING TENDON IDEALIZATION TENDON TRUSS TENDON POINT ELEMENT e 4 e RIGID 2 FRAME e J 3 NODE e I 1 CONSTRAINTS Y (v) q X (u) (a) TENDON ELEMENT GEOMETRY INTERNAL TENDON FORCE F q q J u u i i J v v i J (b) TENDON ELEMENT DEGREES OF FREEDOM

  31. GEOMETRY OF A PRESTRESSING TENDON SEGMENT PASSING THROUGH A FINITE ELEMENT TENDON p J SEGMENT y k a J J J' J e z J z b J a I x I' e I z I I j b I i p I Z Y X

  32. IMPLICATIONS OF REPRESENTATION OF TENDON AS A RESISTING ELEMENT (Integrated Approach) • Calculation of time-dependent effects becomes implicit. • Creep • Shrinkage • Relaxation in prestressing • Aging of concrete • Elimination from the analysis • Transformation of concrete/steel • n = Es/Ec • Break down of post-tensioning effects into “post-tensioning” and “hyperstatic” actions p

  33. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE FORTENDON AS A RESISTING ELEMENT

  34. 100 TENDON 500 800 60 60 400 250 300 Beam dimensions, Span 1 500x800mm Span 2 500x800mm Concrete Strength 40 Mpa Concrete long-term model ACI 209-78 Ultimate creep coefficient 2.5 Ultimate shrinkage coefficient 0.000400 Bonded Tendon Tendon Area 988 mm Coefficient of angular friction 0.25 /radian Coefficient of wobble friction 0.000066 /m Jacking force (left end) 1470 kN Applied loading: dead load only 12kN /m 2

  35. STRESS LOSS IN TENDON AFTER 20 YEARS 100 TENDON 500 800 60 60 400 250 300 (a) BEAM ELEVATION 1600 JACKING STRESS 1500 100 1400 90 TENDON STRESS (MPa) 1300 83% % OF JACKING STRESS 80 1200 79% FINAL 1100 STRESS 70 72% 1000 SPAN 1 SPAN 2 (b) STRESS ALONG BEAM

  36. POST-TENSIONING ACTIONS & LOSSES USING DISCRETE TENDON MODELING (kN-m) -385.0 -175.0 564.0 (a) POST-TENSIONING MOMENTS 162.0 (b) HYPERSTATIC MOMENTS -80.3 37.0 34.8 (c) MOMENTS DUE TO LONG-TERM LOSSES

  37. SUMMARYand CONCLUSIONS

  38. CONCLUDING REMARKS • Presented the structural modeling techniques of post-tensioning tendons • Described the merits and limitations of each modeling technique • Discrete tendon modeling will replace the traditional and approximate methods of • stress loss calculations through integrated • implicit calculations

  39. TENDON MODELING SCHEMES AND FEATURES

  40. REFERENCES Aalami, B. O. (1990) “Load Balancing - A Comprehensive Solution to Post-Tensioning.” ACI Structural Journal, v. 87 no. 6, November/December, 1990. pp 662-670. ADAPT Corp. (1998). ADAPT-PT Post-Tensioning Software System Manual. ADAPT Corporation, 1733 Woodside Road #220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA. ADAPT Corp. (1999). ADAPT-ABI Software Manual. ADAPT Corporation, 1733 Woodside Road #220, Redwood City, CA 94061 USA. Lin T. Y. and Burns, N. (1981) Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures, 3rd Edition. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Scordelis, A. C. (1994) “Computer Methods for Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Structures,” PCI Journal, November-December, pp. 116-135

  41. Thank you for listening

  42. Slide Log

  43. p

More Related