80 likes | 204 Views
MTAC Workgroup 112 Preparing for CASS Cycle L – DPV ™ and LACS Link ™. MTAC Meeting May 16, 2007. MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L. Issue Statement
E N D
MTAC Workgroup 112Preparing for CASS Cycle L – DPV™ and LACSLink™ MTAC MeetingMay 16, 2007
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Issue Statement • The work group is tasked with ensuring the USPS and industry work in concert to allow for a smooth transition to an environment where ZIP+4 CASS/MASS Certified Address Matching software is integrated with LACSLink and DPV.
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Desired Results • To ensure that after a diligent effort to correct and upgrade mailing lists and address databases is undertaken, the costs of mailing are the lowest combined costs to both the USPS and industry.
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Participants • Sponsors: Industry - Ernie Rojas - Joe Lubenow USPS - Charlie Bravo - Nick Barranca • Group Leaders: Industry – Barry Elliott, Mike Dubberke USPS – Lisa West, Charles Hunt • Group: 70 Industry–Postal Members
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Action To Date • Workgroup formed on December 1, 2006 • 12+ Group Leader Teleconferences • Workgroup Meetings • Kickoff Meeting – February 8, 2007 • Second Meeting – February 21, 2007 • Third Meeting – March 29, 2007 • Teleconference – May 8, 2007
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Results • 96 Original Issues Consolidated to 32 • Issues Categorized into Six Groups • USPS Clarified Details • All Issues Successfully Completed • Communication Plan Implemented
MTAC #112 – Preparing for CASS Cycle L Issues Determined to be Outside #112 Scope • Creation of Derivative Products • Explore ways and make specific recommendations to allow compiled or other national and complete files with complete names and finest depth DPV verified addresses to be used to complete and correct name and/or address problems • Planning for Future CASS Cycles • Provide a forum for the USPS, developers, licensees, service bureaus and mailers to collaborate on issues • PO Box Only Delivery Addresses • Desire to provide both forms of addresses