1 / 18

Council for Research Education SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET

Council for Research Education SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET. Supporting a culture of research and education 8 th November 2011 Dr Anne Lee dr.anne.lee@which.net www.drannelee.wordpress.com. Trends in doctoral education Identifying ‘ doctorateness ’

rendor
Download Presentation

Council for Research Education SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Council for Research EducationSVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET Supporting a culture of research and education 8th November 2011 Dr Anne Lee dr.anne.lee@which.net www.drannelee.wordpress.com

  2. Trends in doctoral education • Identifying ‘doctorateness’ • Recent developments in the UK relating to learning outcomes • Creating appropriate milestones

  3. Trends in doctoral education (Taylor 2009) • Massification • Globalisation • Diversification • Commodification • “McDonaldisation” • Regulation • Capitalisation • Multiplication

  4. Implications for supervisory practice • Group supervision • Supporting diversity • Meeting institutional demands for completion • Following polices and procedures • Generic skills and careers advice • Meeting student expectations

  5. What do students want? Identifying student motivation, objectives and needs

  6. Identifying ‘doctorateness’ • UK Framework for Higher Education • Dublin Descriptors • Researcher Development Framework • Stepping stones to the Doctorate

  7. Dublin Descriptors: The Third Cycle Qualifications are awarded to students who: • have demonstrated a systematic understanding of a field of study and mastery of the skills and methods of research associated with that field; • have demonstrated the ability to conceive, design, implement and adapt a substantial process of research with scholarly integrity; • have made a contribution through original research that extends the frontier of knowledge by developing a substantial body of work, some of which merits national or international refereed publication; • are capable of critical analysis, evaluation and synthesis of new and complex ideas; • can communicate with their peers, the larger scholarly community and with society in general about their areas of expertise; • can be expected to be able to promote, within academic and professional contexts, technological, social or cultural advancement in a knowledge based society;

  8. The Researcher Development Framework • Major new approach to researcher development • Builds the UK research base • Develops world-class researchers • Enhances the personal, professional and career development of researchers • Developed through UK-wide interviews with successful researchers in a range of disciplines • Led by Vitae in collaboration with the HE sector and other stakeholders

  9. The Researcher Development Framework • Framework of the knowledge, behaviour and attributes of successful researchers • Enables self-assessment of strengths and areas for further development • Common framework across institutions in the UK • Universal language for communicating researcher capabilities

  10. Using the RDF • Researchers: • identify strengths and priorities for professional and career development • Managers and supervisors of researchers • fundamental to planning researcher development • Staff supporting researchers in HEIs • underpins strategies for researcher development • Policy makers, employers and other stakeholders • realising researchers’ potential for all sectors of the economy and society

  11. 4 domains • 12 sub-domains • 63 descriptors

  12. PLACING QUESTIONS FOR ASSESSING A THESISAdapted from Trafford V and Leshem S (2008) Stepping Stones to Achieving your Doctorate: by focussing on your viva from the start. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill/Open University Press

  13. PLACING QUESTIONS FOR ASSESSING A THESISAdapted from Trafford V and Leshem S (2008) Stepping Stones to Achieving your Doctorate: by focussing on your viva from the start. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill/Open University Press

  14. Some typical examination questions • Why did you choose this topic for your doctorate? • How did you arrive at your conceptual framework? • How did you design your research? • How would you justify your choice of methodology? • Why did you decide to use XYZ as your main instrument(s)? • How did you select your respondents/material/area? • How did you arrive at your conceptual conclusions? • How generalisable are your findings and why? • What is your contribution to knowledge? • We would like you to critique your thesis for us • What are you going to do after you gain your doctorate? • Is there anything else you could tell us about your thesis which you have not had the opportunity to tell us during the viva? Pp20-22 Trafford and Leshman (2008)

  15. How to prepare the student for their assessment

  16. Creating appropriate milestones? • Regular supervision meetings • Completion of summary forms of supervision discussion • Log books signed off • Agenda for supervision meetings planned a year ahead • Self assessment on progress towards meeting learning outcomes presented to supervisor • Presentations to colleagues • Agreed deadlines for papers to be written • First draft • Soliciting feedback • Submissions • Mock defence

  17. RDF Links and resources • RDF: www.vitae.ac.uk/rdf • RDS: www.vitae.ac.uk/rds • RDF profiles:www.vitae.ac.uk/rdfprofiles • Downloadable CPD tool: www.vitae.ac.uk/rdftool • Contact: rdf@vitae.ac.uk

  18. References Dublin Descriptors (2004) www.jointquality.org Higher Education Funding Council. (October 2011/33) PhD study. Trends and Profiles http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2011/11_33/ Higher Education Academy: Postgraduate Research Experience Survey http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/postgraduate/PRES_2011_report Higher Education Academy Professional Standards Framework http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/ukpsf/ukpsf.pdf Lee A (2012) Successful Research Supervision. Abingdon. Routledge. QAA (2004) Code of Practice for Postgraduate Research Programmes http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/postgrad2004.pdf QAA (2008) Framework for Higher Education Qualifications http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/FHEQ08.pdf Taylor, S. (2009) The Post-Humboldtian Doctorate: Implications for Supervisory Practice. in V.King, F.Deepwell, L. Clouder, L. and C. Broughan (eds.) Academic Futures: Inquiries into Higher Education and Pedagogy. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Trafford V and Leshem S (2008) Stepping Stones to Achieving your Doctorate: by focussing on your viva from the start. Maidenhead. McGraw Hill/Open University Press

More Related