1 / 48

Neutrino Physics

Neutrino Physics. Joe Grange UPS c/o 2006 Univ. of Florida PhD candidate. Today. What are neutrinos? Neutrino history New physics! The oscillating neutrino Modern neutrino detectors What can neutrinos tell us about our universe?. n History: .

reuel
Download Presentation

Neutrino Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrino Physics Joe Grange UPS c/o 2006 Univ. of Florida PhD candidate

  2. Today • What are neutrinos? • Neutrino history • New physics! The oscillating neutrino • Modern neutrino detectors • What can neutrinos tell us about our universe?

  3. n History: • Early 20th century physicists thought the things that make up our macroscopic world (nuclei, electrons, photons) were the only things that make up the universe • If that’s the case, then the common radioactive “beta (electron) decay” involves only a proton and an electron n p e Assuming energy + momentum conservation, electron would have the same energy in every decay

  4. Intersection of data and theory Data • Hypothesis was wrong! So either: • the decay involves more than two particles or • energy is not conserved • Latter option might sound drastic, but, e.g. Niels Bohr (right) was ready to abandon E conservation • Wolfgang Pauli (left) chose the former

  5. “A desperate remedy” • 1930, Pauli proposed a light, electrically neutral particle carried away the missing energy • “I dare not publish this idea…but only those who wager can win…” • “I have done a terrible thing. I have postulated a particle that cannot be detected” • A few years later, Enrico Fermi further incorporated this particle into present theory, named it • “Neutr-”: neutral • “-ino”: little one n

  6. Neutr- “ino”: how small? • Not totally sure! Active area to find the absolute mass, but from indirect measurements we know it’s ~0.1 eV (electron-volts) Analogy: if a n weighs as much as a penny… An electron would weigh as much as a car, a proton would weigh as much as a space shuttle, and a human would weigh 20x Jupiter!

  7. Why “cannot be detected”? • Can be detected, it just turned out to be very hard • hadn’t seen it before, must have extremely low probability to interact • Of the four fundamental forces (gravitation, strong nuclear, electricity & magnetism, weak), neutrinos only interact weakly. Aptly named! • at the dentist’s office, a vest with a few mm of lead stops x-rays, meanwhile you’d need ~1 light year(10 trillion miles) of lead to stop a n!

  8. First proposed expt: “El Monstro” • First proposed n experiment used an atomic bomb as the source of n’s! • different times! • To shield the detector from the blast, simultaneously drop it with the explosion • Ultimately went with a more responsible source of nuclear reactor

  9. Finding n’s • So folks thought n’s carried away the missing energy in beta decay • Just like any other physical reaction, ought to be able to “reverse” the reaction n n e- n p W n e+ W n n p n n p p e- e+

  10. First n detection: 1956 • Discovery of n ~25 years after proposed by W. Pauli • Detection: • e+ annihilates with e- in medium, detect g rays • neutron captures in medium, releases g’s • Basic rule of n detection: • nothing comes in • outgoing particles consistent with n interaction

  11. n “flavors” • That the neutrinos from nuclear reactors produce electrons important! • Three “flavors” of neutrinos (+antineutrinos) that dictate what they can produce • “electron-type” ne • “muon-type” nm • “tau-type” nt • Lepton flavor conservation • that is, only a nt can produce a t, etc.

  12. How n’s interact with matter Charged-partner conversion Scattering nm nm nm ne t- m- N N N N’ N N’ No way!

  13. 1960s: let’s look for more n’s! • The sun predicted to be a very hot source of ne’s (and only ne’s) • Ray Davis stuck a giant (600t) vat of cleaning fluid (C2Cl4) inside a mine • ne’s from the sun should interact with Cl, turn it to Ar • Count the Ar atoms! • 2/3 are missing? • Prediction: 5.7 ± 0.9 Ar/day • Data: 1.9 ± 0.2 Ar/day

  14. 1990s: data confirmed • Using modern n detection techniques (more later), the ne deficit confirmed What’s happening?! Three options: Are independent experiments wrong? Do we not understand the physics of the sun? Is something happening to the n’s?

  15. A new way of testing n’s • 2001: An experiment with unique sensitivity to ne but also all n flavors (ne, nm, nt) releases data sensitive to ne’s exclusively (tests previous expts) look at all n flavors (tests total n flux)

  16. A new way of testing n’s • 2001: An experiment with unique sensitivity to ne but also all n flavors (ne, nm, nt) releases data • only way of “looking” at nm, nt from the sun! • energy too low (~10 MeV) to create m, t particles • Me = 0.5 MeV • Mm = 105 MeV • Mt = 1800 MeV sensitive to ne’s exclusively (tests previous expts) look at all n flavors (tests total n flux)

  17. Solution! • Data confirms both theory and previous experiments! • We know the n’s have flavor ne when created in the sun, yet 2/3 have flavor either nmor nt on earth! • This was the first definitive evidence that n’s oscillate! • that is, they can be “born” one flavor, and detected as another

  18. n oscillation • What does this mean?! (quantum mechanics ahead!) • The npropagation state (i.e. Hamiltonian or mass eigenstate) is NOT the nflavor state (i.e. interaction eigenstate) • Rather, the propagation states (n1, n2, n3) are quantum mechanical admixtures of the three flavor (ne, nm, nt) states • n’s are constantly in an entangled state of ne, nm, nt! Immediate implications: • n’s have mass! Previously thought to have m = 0 • lepton flavor not always conserved!

  19. n oscillation • Just like the famous example of Schrödinger's cat: if the cat has an equal probability of being alive or dead • Then, quantum mechanically, it exists in superposition of both states. In some sense, simultaneously alive and dead! • Any n is simultaneously ne, nm, and nt! P = ½ ( ) + ½( )

  20. Going a little deeper • For simplicity, let’s pretend only 2 flavor and propagation states • Simplifying assumptions: • n’s travel near speed of light • n mass is small compared to it’s energy • Then, after travelling distance L, a ne of energy E has q = arbitrary mixing angle Turns out to be a good assumption! Dm2 = (mn1 - mn2)2 Probability to be detected nm: Probability to be detected ne:

  21. Going a little deeper • ne “disappearance”: • nm “appearance”: simple harmonic oscillator!

  22. Going a little deeper • ne “disappearance”: • nm “appearance”: simple harmonic oscillator! Nature: q oscillation amplitude; Dm2 oscillation frequency Experiment: E n energy, L distance n travels

  23. Going a little deeper n created as ne Prob. detected ne ~q, osc. amplitude Prob. detected nm ~Dm2, osc. frequency

  24. Going a little deeper n created as ne Prob. detected ne Experimental game: nature has chosen oscillation parameters q, Dm2, we choose n E, propagation distance L, look for appearance or disappearance! ~q, osc. amplitude Prob. detected nm ~Dm2, osc. frequency

  25. Proton-atmosphere collisions Where do neutrinos come from? The sun Supernova • Roughly 100 trillion neutrinos from the sun pass through your body every second! • on average, only 2 will interact in your lifetime Nuclear Fusion Everything we know about n’s made possible by these sources • Neutrinos created in neutron decay as a by-product of nuclear fission Nuclear reactors Particle accelerators • Incredible when you consider how “bright” they are from the ~ 1% of energy that goes to photons • Around 99% of thermal energy released in core-collapse supernovae carried away by n! • n beam created by smashing protons into nuclear material • safe to stand in! • High-energy cosmic particles (from supernova?) collide with atmospheric atoms to produce particle showers, including those that decay to n

  26. Other n sources • Bananas • a single banana emits about 1 million n’s per day from naturally-occurring radioactive potassium • The big bang! • Still around! Big bang so strong and n’s so weakly interacting that ~50 big bang n’s pass through your thumb per second!

  27. Available n energies • Luckily, even the natural n sources span a wide energy range! • Gives us the E in the quantity L/E we use to probe n oscillations. Next up, L but first…

  28. Modern n detection • All about collecting the tiniest signals of light (photons) • “Photomultiplier” tube exploits Einstein’s photoelectric effect • e.g., Super Kamiokande, a gigantic detector houses ~11,000 tubes in 50,000 tons of ultra pure H20! incoming photons ejected electrons (signal) light can behave like a particle and a wave!

  29. How do n’s lead to photons? • Light travels slower in detector medium (water, oil, lead, ice) than in vacuum • vacuum: light travels at c; medium: light travels at c/n, nthe index of refraction • Particles can have v > c/n! Just like a sonic boom from a jet: when traveling faster than speed of sound, a sonic shock wave follows. n detectors see “light booms”! “Cherenkov light” creates ring of light

  30. Modern n detection • n flavor determined by charged partner production difference in ring due to mass: mm ~200 * me

  31. n detectors around the world ANTARES - at the bottom of the Mediterranean sea! 350m MiniBooNE observes accelerator n’s SNO - buried in a Canadian mine

  32. n detectors around the world • The biggest detector in the world: “IceCube” at south pole • Use 1 cubic km of ice as a neutrino detector!

  33. Last experimental issue:n travel distance L • Naturaln sources: • Artificial sources: • n travel distance limited by diameter of Earth! atmospheric ~40 km or 13,000 km solar MINOS experiment: shoots n’s from IL to MN

  34. n oscillation parameters found! • Fortunately, both natural n sources (solar, atmospheric) provide n oscillations we’re sensitive to on Earth! • Both oscillation modes confirmed by man-made n sources with different n E, travel distance L, but same ratio L/E

  35. n oscillation parameters found! • Fortunately, both natural n sources (solar, atmospheric) provide n oscillations we’re sensitive to on Earth! • Both oscillation modes confirmed by man-made n sources with different n E, travel distance L, but same ratio L/E KamLAND nuclear reactor expt confirms solar osc. parameters MINOS accelerator expt confirms atmospheric n oscillations (confirmed by other experiments too!)

  36. n oscillation parameters found! • oscillation parameters: Confirmation with Super-K, K2K and MINOS data Confirmation with SNO, Kamland data

  37. So what do we know? • From only these two sets of oscillation parameters, we know almost the entire mixing matrix U c = cos s= sin • Only remaining pieces: q13, d • q13: “how much flavor state ne is in the mass state n3?” • d: do neutrinos and anti-neutrinos oscillate differently?

  38. Exciting times for n’s! • March 7: Daya Bay (China) reactor experiment announces discovery of q13! • April 3 (two days ago!!): RENO (Korea) reactor experiment announces independent confirmation! • “During preparation of this paper, Daya Bay reportedobservation of a non-zero value for q13” • d only meaningful if q13 is non-zero • sin(0) = 0 s13 = sin q13

  39. d: are n’s responsible forour universe? • Our universe clearly dominated by matter, yet we’ve no idea why • In the lab, if we create/destroy matter we always create/destroy antimatter in equal quantities - should be true for big bang too • Where did all the antimatter go?? • n’scould be responsible. Because n’s so prolific in early universe, even a small difference between neutrino, anti-neutrino oscillations could’ve tipped the balance in favor of matter domination

  40. Other outstanding issues • What is the absolute n mass? • we only know square of mass state differences • KATRIN experiment hopes to measure it • Are there more than three n mass states? • many hints, nothing conclusive yet • What’s the ordering of the mass states? • Are neutrinos their own antiparticle?

  41. Summary • n physics is a young field, but incredible progress is being made • n oscillations one of the very few concrete results not predicted by the hallowed standard model • Along the way, we are constructing the biggest particle detectors in history • In the near future (decades?) we may know everything about n’s, including whether or not they’re responsible for the formation of our universe

  42. Thanks for listening! jgrange@alum.ups.edu

  43. backup

  44. Going a little deeper • Explicitly, • Say the sun created a ne: • Multiply by QM time propagator: • Simplifying assumptions: • n’s travel near speed of light • n mass is small compared to it’s energy • only two propagation states contribute to oscillations

  45. 30cm it only takes ~1/10 A to stop a heart… we run 174 kA through the horn, around 106 times more! Beryllium “slugs” - our target! 70cm

  46. I B protons (Ampere’s Law) 5 × 1012 protons, 5 times a second! For current flowing along a long, straight wire,

  47. protons

  48. However, focusing is NOT perfect. • Not all get defocused, mostly due to low angle production and higher energies • opposite charged particles will not get swept away if they • don’t “notice” the magnetic field protons • This leads to beam, hence data, contamination • Contamination varies based on energy of incoming protons, • current, horn/target geometry, and horn polarity

More Related