360 likes | 633 Views
Get it in Keep it in Keep it running. Adventures in bedside feeding tube placement and other hands-on feeding tube related activities by registered dietitians. Utah Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Annual Meeting, March 20, 2014. Objectives.
E N D
Get it in Keep it in Keep it running Adventures in bedside feeding tube placement and other hands-on feeding tube related activities by registered dietitians. Utah Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Annual Meeting, March 20, 2014
Objectives • Describe the experience of one clinical nutrition team developing a program for hands-on feeding tube placement and care. • Discuss benefits in terms of patient care of dietitian involvement in feeding tube placement and care, including cost savings. • Discuss pros and cons for dietitians of taking on the role of feeding tube placement and care.
What Get it in Bedside feeding tube placement Keep it in FT bridle placement Keep it running FT clog clearing By Dietitians
Why • Altruistim (patient care) • Self interest (job satisfaction) • Practical reasons (cost containment)
Job Satisfaction • Avoid burn out • New marketable skill • Increased recognition
Getting It Done Data collection Training Equipment Support Idea
Desire Idea Inspiration
Support • Direct manager • Fellow staff • Nursing • Physicians • Administration • Approving committees • Outside sources
Dobhoff feeding tube OUCH!
Training: bridle placement • MD champion • Watch one – Do one • Competency check list provided by manufacturer
Bridle placement method • Insert probes • Feel & listen for click • Remove stylet • Pull tape through • Clip onto feeding tube • Knot and clip ends
Training: bedside feeding tube placement • Outside advice • Create training competency • One on one training with multiple RNs • Trained RDs pass off other RDs
FT placement method • Position patient • Measure • Advance to stomach • Assess • Pull back with syringe • Watch for “pop” • Observe contents for amount, texture, color • Listen over abdomen middle and side • Advance using “puff and twist” • Assess again, look for changes • Secure • Confirm placement (abdominal film) • Document
Training: TubeClear • In-house training by manufacturer • Artificial feeding tube clogs provided • Competency checklist provided
Dietitian Pros & Cons • Better understanding of patient experience • Increased empathy • Ability to trouble shoot feeding tube problems • Recognition from RNs and other staff • Improved relationship with caregiver team
Dietitian Pros & Cons • Exposure to mucous and vomit • Inflict pain or discomfort • Difficult or agitated patients • Increased responsibility/liability • Greater commitment
Data collection • Checklist items • Adverse events • RD time spent • Time from order to insertion • Gastric vs SB placement • Who placed the tube
Reduced total fluoro placement • Bedside placement by RNs and RDs • Avoid unnecessary replacement • Bridles • Clearing clogs • Avoiding clogs • Feed stomach when appropriate • Educating MDs on appropriate uses for fluoro • Intraoperative placement
Reduced total fluoro placement • Feeding tubes placed in fluoro • 2012: 124 • 2013: 88 • Cost reduced by 29%
References McClave et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adjult Critically Ill Patient. JPEN, 2009, 33 (3),:277-316. Faisy et al. Impact of energy deficit calculated by a predictive method on outcome in medical patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. Fr J Nutr. 2009;101:1079-1087. Bartlett et al. Measurement of metabolism in multiple organ failure. Surgery. 1982;92:771-779. Villet et al. Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding an denergy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients. ClinNutr. 2005;24:502-509.