1 / 17

The 2004 Technical ESOP Conference November 4 & 5, 2004

The 2004 Technical ESOP Conference November 4 & 5, 2004. Innovative ESOP Transactions. Scott E. Adamson Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, California 90071-3132 Phone: 213-612-7365 sadamson@morganlewis.com. Louis H. Diamond Buchanan Ingersoll PC

rigg
Download Presentation

The 2004 Technical ESOP Conference November 4 & 5, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The 2004 Technical ESOP ConferenceNovember 4 & 5, 2004 Innovative ESOP Transactions Scott E. Adamson Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2200 Los Angeles, California 90071-3132 Phone: 213-612-7365 sadamson@morganlewis.com Louis H. Diamond Buchanan Ingersoll PC 1776 K Street, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20006 Phone: 202-452-7950 diamondlh@bipc.com Jared Kaplan McDermott Will & Emery227 West Monroe Chicago, Illinois 60606-5096 Phone: 312-904-6955 jkaplan@mwe.com

  2. Innovative ESOP Transactions • Using qualified plan assets to fund a non-leveraged S-corporation ESOP • The CRT combined with an ESOP • Convertible preferred and super common stock • ESOP in conjunction with an LLC • S Corp. converted to C Corp. followed by §1042 tax-deferred transaction • Investment in synthetic equity

  3. Parent401(k) ESOP/401(k) Bank OtherInvestors Case 1: Using Qualified Plan Assets to Fund a Non-Leveraged S-corporation ESOP Parent Company A Transaction Steps • Company B adopts an ESOP • Company B employees transfer 401(k) accounts to Company B ESOP • Participants in transferred 401(k) accounts elect to liquidate investments and invest in Company B through ESOP • Senior and subordinated debt are raised, if necessary • Company B elects Subchapter S status • Company B ESOP purchases Company stock with proceeds of liquidated 401(k) accounts, senior debt, and subordinated debt Cash Assets / Cash SubsidiaryCompany B Stock Cash Debt Cash SubordinatedDebt Cash

  4. Case 1: Using Qualified Plan Assets to Fund a Non-leveraged S-corporation • ESOP purchase for no more than fair market value • Third party standard • All transaction elements (warrants, etc.) considered • Financial feasibility • Leverage and debt service • Repurchase liability • Operating cash flow needs • Subchapter S benefits • Refinancing possibilities • Synthetic equity • Repurchase liability • No unallocated shares • Recycling of shares through plan • Company involvement in internal market

  5. Case 1: Using Qualified Plan Assets to Fund a Non-leveraged S-corporation ESOP • Federal and state securities law • Available SEC registration exemptions • Employer vs. employee sourced funds • Rule 701 • Regulations A and D • Private placement memorandum or registration statement • State "blue sky" laws • Fiduciary issues • Trustee role • Information for employees • Trustee responsibility for employee choice • Employee meetings/ "dog and pony" show • Internal market • Give employees right to purchase stock using 401(k) contributions to KSOP • Match 401(k) contributions with stock

  6. Case 2: CRT Combined with an ESOP • Definition of Charitable Remainder Trust ("CRT”) • Trust with charities as beneficiaries • Corpus distributed to chosen charities at end of trust term • Donor receives income interest during donor life • Other aspects • Donor receives charitable deduction for stock contributed • Donor controls trust investments • Replenish estate with last-to-die insurance

  7. CRT FLP Case 2: CRT Combined with an ESOP $10,000,000 51% $5,100,000 $1,900,000 49%

  8. Case 3: Convertible Preferred and Super Common Stock • Company recapitalizes and exchanges special class of stock for common stock • Shareholder sells special class of stock to ESOP • Convertible preferred • Super common • Most effective in sales of minority interest in company • Stock must be a qualifying employer security • Readily tradable common stock • Stock having highest voting and dividend rights • Preferred convertible into best common

  9. Case 3: Convertible Preferred and Super Common Stock - Structure ESOP • Shareholder exchanges existing common for new security in recapitalization • Company borrows funds (if necessary) and relends to ESOP • Shareholder sells preferred stock or super common to ESOP Converrtible Preferred/ Super Common Cash Shareholder Company Converrtible Preferred/ Super Common Common Stock

  10. Case 3: Convertible Preferred and Super Common Stock - Issues • Valuation • Stock valued according to its rights • Value of stock is sum of: • Present value of "preferred" dividend, plus • Value of underlying common stock • "Preferred" dividend often limited in term • Stock may be callable, further limiting value of dividend • Portion of value of stock attributable to "preferred," dividend declines over time • Match "preferred" dividend to ESOP debt service • Tax issues • Convertible preferred - creation of §306 stock • Super common - fast pay considerations

  11. Case 4: ESOPs in Conjunction with an LLC • Create LLC owned by ESOP company • Company can raise capital by selling LLC units • Can structure units to meet investors' needs • Maintain Sub S status • Characteristics of an LLC • Pass through entity for tax purposes • No limitations on rights and terms of ownership interests • No limitations on number or type of investors • Anti-abuse S Corp. rules

  12. Investor Investor Partial Ownership Partial Ownership • Limited LiabilityCompany • Operating entity • Limited LiabilityCompany • Operating entity Case 4: ESOPs in Conjunction with an LLC - Structure • Company assets are contributed /sold to a newly created LLC. • Workforce continues to be employed by the Company and is leased to the LLC. • Company raises capital by selling LLC interests • Alternatively, shareholder could swap ownership in Company for interest in LLC • Anti-abuse S Corp. rules must be considered ESOP 100% Ownership • Company • Employs workforce • Leases employees to LLC Majority Ownership

  13. Case 4: ESOP / LLC Transactions- Issues • Valuation and Financial Considerations • Value of LLC units sold • Fairness and adequate consideration • Returns relative to other investors • LLC solvency • Cash flow between LLC and investors, including ESOP • Tax considerations on transfer of assets to LLC • Potential tax leakage • Fiduciary Considerations • View ESOP transaction and LLC transaction as one integrated transaction • Prudence • Financial fairness • Corporate governance • Qualifying employer securities • Securities laws

  14. Case 5: S Corp. Converted to C Followed by §1042 Tax Deferred Transaction • S Corp. companies may elect C Corp. status prior to ESOP transaction • Achieve §1042 transaction for shareholders • Must remain C Corp. for five years • Maximize tax benefits for S-corporation years • Adopt ESOP on 12/31 of year 1 • Receive extension of tax return until 9/15 of year 2 • Maximize ESOP contribution as of 9/15 of year 2 (attributed to year 1) • Maximize ESOP contribution as of 12/31 of year 2 (attributed to year 2) • Elect C Corp. status on 1/2 of year 3 • Minimize tax liabilities for C-corporation years • Maximize ESOP contributions • Maximize dividends • Financial and valuation effects • Significant shareholder S Corp. tax deductions achieved attributable to years 1 and 2 • ESOP funding implemented

  15. Case 6: Synthetic Equity in ESOP Transactions • 100% S Corp. owned by ESOP is desired • Must purchase shares of non-ESOP shareholders, who may desire an equity-like investment in Company • Non-ESOP shareholders' investment options • Subordinated note • Cash • Warrants • Combination • Consider shareholder tax consequences • §1042 treatment, including basis rollover • Capital gains • Installment sale • Fiduciary issues • Value of securities, particularly warrants • Relative returns

  16. ESOP 100% Ownership Company Case 6: Synthetic Equity - ESOP Transaction Structure Shareholder Receives Cash, Notes, and/or Warrants • Transaction Steps • Shareholder sells existing stake in Company for some combination of notes and warrants. Shareholder could also receive some cash, if desired • Company must raise cash if cash is part of transaction • Structure of notes and/or warrants to be determined Cash, Notesand/or Warrants Shareholders Stock

  17. Case 6: Synthetic Equity - Issues • Subchapter S / ESOP abuse legislation and regulation • Background • IRC §409(p) • New §409(p) temporary and proposed regulations • Nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements • Financial and valuation aspects • Increased company leverage • Enable retention of Subchapter S benefits in company • Practical limits on amount of warrants based on relative fair market and economic values of stock vs. warrants • Future funding needs to "cash out" warrants • Structure of warrants to retain S Corp. election • S Corp. requirements • Fair market value exercise price • Puts/calls may be necessary

More Related