Plagiarism and plagiarism checks at TTÜ School of Business and Governance

1. Plagiarism and plagiarism checks atTTÜ School of Business and Governance Laivi Laidroo

2. Plagiarism – thoughts, ideas, formulas, data, figures or text being presented as the author’s own contribution without proper reference to the original author or source. • Autoplagiarism – the author uses his/her own text (e.g. a work submitted earlier in another course) without providing a proper reference to own prior work. Why it is important to understand what it is? • Plagiarism is a form of violation of academic practice which may result: • in grade „0“ for the written assignment and a decision that the thesis is not allowed to the final defence; • in case of all written assignments, as an additional punishment, the Dean’s letter of reprimand or the dismissal from the university (depending on the extent of plagiarism). • While determining the punishment, the decision will not depend on whether plagiarism was intentional or non-intentional – lack of knowledge does not release from responsibility. Whatisplagiarism?

3. It is important to reference properly by distinguishing: A quote – word-by-word repetition of another author’s claim which has to be in quotation marks. It has to follow the original completely in terms of wording, orthography, punctuation and emphasis (e.g. italics, underlining etc). Example in case of parenthetical referencing: „Public policy making is characterised [foremost in the NPM concept] ... the employer-executor problem.“ (Lane 1996, 7). A paraphrase – presentation of another author or source in own words. In case of referring the presentation does not follow the original word-by-word and the author paraphrases the thought appropriately (in a summarising, commenting form). Example in case of parenthetical referencing: Economics has been defined as the science which analysesis a person’s behaviourdepenedent on the discrepancy between his aim and possibilities (Arrak 2000, 7). Good examples about how to avoid plagiarism: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B28aGnsx9ebxR3RLdl9FY2NYeDQ Howtoavoid plagiarism? (1)

4. Reminder on quotations: Quotes are usually used if the example is vivid, interesting, colourful. In other cases use paraphrase. Word-by-word translation is a quote and has to be formatted accordingly.If the objective is to paraphrase, then in parallel to the translation of the original, the text should be immediately re-worded. Excessive use of quotes and merger of multiple quotes from different sources (without author’s own contribution) should be avoided. Common mistakes, which constitute plagiarism: Reference has been added, however, the text has been taken one-to-one, i.e. the text should have been marked as a quote, but is presented as paraprhase. Reference is missing completely and the text is presented as the author’s own original work. Texthas been paraphrased to the minimal extent - only a few conjunctions have been added or a few words have been replaced. Howtoavoid plagiarism? (2)

5. Original text from article Marston, C.; Starker, M. (2001), "Investor Relations: A European Survey", Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 82-93. This paper examines the importance of the investor relations function within the top 80 continental European companies by reporting on the result of a postal questionnaire. The results confirm that many continental European companies have well established investor relations practices and the function is growing in importance. How to put down the result of the investigation? paraphrase: A survey conducted in 80 continental European companies confirmed the strength of investor relations and the growth in its importance (Marston, Starker 2001). quote: Weknowthat„... many continental European companies have well established investor relations practices and the function is growing in importance.“ (Marston, Starker 2001) Excercise 1

6. Definition from article Marston, C.; Starker, M. (2001), "Investor Relations: A European Survey", Corporate Communciations: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 82-93. Investor relations (IR) has been defined as „the management of the relationship between a company with publicly traded securities and the holders or potential holders of such securities“ (Investor Relations Society, 1997). If you would want to put down a definition of investor relations, what should you do? Search for the original source, in this case Investor Relations Society (1997), and if you find the same definition from there, you may use it word-by-word. If you do not find the definition from the original source, you could try to find some other source which provides a definition for investor relations. If you do not find any alternative source, you could cite through the secondary source i.e. Investor relations have been defined as „ the management of the relationship between a company with publicly traded securities and the holders or potential holders of such securities“ (Investor Relations Society, 1997 referenced in Marston, Starker 2001) Excercise 2

7. All sources used by the author have to be referenced – all sources referenced in the text have to be includedinthe list of references and all items in the list of references have to be referenced to in the text. No references to commonly known facts, data, viewpoints are necessary if these are known to majority of people and available in encyclopedia, dictionaries etc. Still, references have to be provided if the claims are disputable or the phenomenon is being interpreted. You should always refer to the original source. If the sentences, thoughts are not available from the original source, you can refer to them through another source. Then you should present the reference of the original source togetherwith the source through which the original is referred to, i.e. (Serra 1963 referenced in Kattel 2007, 4). Reminder on referencing

8. All theses submitted to defence in TTÜ School of Business and Governance will go through a plagiarism check. Random checks are also performed on other longer written assignments. Programme - Ephorus. This programme compares the submitted work with those previously inserted into the system and also text available in the Internet. If matches are found, the programme issues a % of the text that matches the text in some other source and presents in red the problematic parts of the submitted work. Matches greater than 3% are investigated in detail. In case matches are detected, the teachers have been instructed not to provide the student more information that the report shown on the following slide. Plagiarismchecks(1)

9. Example - Summary Report Total match 15%, 12% from the first Wikipedia source. Plagiarism checks (2)

10. The teacher sees also the comparison of the submitted text with the match and can decide whether it is a case of plagiarism. Document with 12% match – Match with red (black the text from the checked thesis). References are missing completely i.e. it is plagiarism case. Plagiarism checks (3)

11. Matches highlighted by the programme which do not constitute plagiarism and which the teacher should not consider plagiarism: • Matches related to the title page(contains standard textthat all studentshavetofollowexactly). • Some of the references in the list of references are a match. If the references are formatted using our formatting guide and some other student has used them in their thesis, these can appear in the report as a match. It may require attention of the teacher if the number of similar references is significant. • The same survey questions have been used (matches appearing in the Appendix or within the text when referring to the questions). • Referring to laws/regulative acts – the author cannot change the wording. • Match with the same author’s work which has been inserted in the system previously. • Quotes – even if these are correctly presented in quotation marks, the programme shows them as a match (with an underline and should catch the eye of the teacher). Plagiarism checks (4)

12. Urban legend surrounding Ephorus – Everycopy-paste section is shown as plagiarism if the text has been directly copied and not when the text has been re-typed by hand one-to-one. Reality – programme marks word-by-word matches irrespective to the insertion approach: • Copied quote, properly referenced – no plagiarism. • Quote re-typed one-to-one, correctly referenced – noplagiarism. • Copiedtext, referencemissing– plagiarism. • Textre-typedone-to-one, referencemissing – plagiarism. Plagiarism checks (5)

13. Plagiarism checks (6) How to avoid potential matches in the plagiarism report? • While preparing the text, please avoid the practice of copying text one-to-one from the original with the aim of paraphrasing it later – do the paraphrasing immediately and put down the version which already uses your own words. • Consider carefully whether the use of quotes is needed. If it is needed, then format these properly (text in citation marks, reference added). • If you use previously prepared questionnaires, laws etc. the text of which cannot be changed, please mark the sources properly. • Do not present the work you have submitted for evaluation previously during another course. If you use some parts of your previous work, refer to it properly. • Use some plagiarism check options which are available in the Internet (these work better with text written in English). What to do if the teacher says that there is too big match with some specific source? • Check out the source, compare it with your work and provide your explanation to the teacher.

14. Plagiarism checks (7) When is plagiarism considered extensive? • Small violation – only a few sentences have been „stolen“, match % is very low. • Extensive violation – entire paragraph or several paragraphs have been „stolen“. • Extremely extensive violation – the work is made up of „stolen“ paragraphs which have been connected with a few sentences by the author. What is done with the work containing extensive violation? • Student is asked to provide his/her comments. Entire report is not forwarded to the student. The most important matching sources from the first page of the Summary Report may be sent to the student to ask for explanations. • If plagiarism is detected, then the teacher has an obligation to submit a notice with all the evidence (Ephorus report, student’s reply etc) to the Committee for Handling Student Violations of Academic Practice and Contemptible Behaviour student.integrity@ttu.ee . • Already submitted thesis is not allowed to the defence and is not allowed to be corrected and re-submitted within the same semester. • In case of other written assignment, the work will be graded 0. • See Schoolregulationlink .

15. THANK YOU!