1 / 10

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Ingestion Pathway Overview

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Ingestion Pathway Overview. Kevin Keyes Northern Section Chief FEMA Region IV kevin.keyes@dhs.gov. A circular area having a radius of about 50 miles measured from the Plant. It is commonly referred to as the 50-mile IPZ. . INGESTION PATHWAY.

roshaun
Download Presentation

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Ingestion Pathway Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Ingestion Pathway Overview Kevin Keyes Northern Section Chief FEMA Region IV kevin.keyes@dhs.gov

  2. A circular area having a radius of about 50 miles measured from the Plant. It is commonly referred to as the 50-mile IPZ. INGESTION PATHWAY

  3. Criterion 2.d.1 – Radiological Assessment for Ingestion Pathway Criterion 2.e.1 – Radiological Assessment and Decision Making for Relocation, Return and Reentry Criterion 3.e.1 – Implementation of Ingestion Pathway Decisions Criterion 3.e.2 – Implementation of IP Decisions for Information on contaminated food and water Criterion 3.f.1 – Implementation of Decisions for Relocation, Return, and Reentry Criterion 4.b.1 – Post Plume Field Monitoring and Sampling Criterion 4.c.1 – Laboratory Operations What do we Evaluate?

  4. Criterion 2.d.1 Radiological consequences for the ingestion pathway are assessed and appropriate PADs are made based on the ORO’s planning criteria. (NUREG-0654 J.9, J.11) What do we evaluate?

  5. 2.e.1 Timely relocation, reentry, and return decisions are made and coordinated as appropriate, based on assessments of the radiological conditions and criteria in the ORO plan and or procedures. (NUREG-0654, I.10; J.9; M.1) What do we evaluate?

  6. 3.e.1 The ORO demonstrates the availability and appropriate use of adequate information regarding water, food supplies, milk, and agricultural production within the ingestion exposure pathway planning zone for implementation of protective actions (NUREG-0654, J.9, J.11) Ingestion Criterion

  7. 3.e.2 Appropriate measures, strategies, and pre-printed instructional material are developed for implementing protective action decisions for contaminated water, food products, milk and agricultural production (NUREG – 0654, J.9, J.11) Ingestion Criterion

  8. 3.f.1 Decisions regarding controlled re-entry of emergency workers and relocation and return of the public are coordinated with appropriate organizations and implemented (NUREG – 0654, M.1, M.3) Ingestion Criterion

  9. 4.b.1 – The field teams demonstrate the capability to make appropriate measurements and to collect appropriate samples (e.g., food crops, milk, water, vegetation, and soil) to support adequate assessments and protective action decision making (NUREG – 0654, I.8, J.11) Ingestion Criterion

  10. 4.c.1 – The laboratory is capable of performing required radiological analyses to support protective action decisions (NUREG – 0654, C.3, J.11) Ingestion Criterion

More Related