1 / 29

Genome scan for cis -regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees

Genome scan for cis -regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees. Saurabh Sinha, Xu Ling, Charles W. Whitfield, Chengxiang Zhai, Gene E. Robinson PNAS 2006. Motivation. Background Social regulation: nursing vs. foraging Switching by age Switching by need

rozalia
Download Presentation

Genome scan for cis -regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior in honey bees Saurabh Sinha, Xu Ling, Charles W. Whitfield, Chengxiang Zhai, Gene E. Robinson PNAS 2006

  2. Motivation • Background • Social regulation: nursing vs. foraging • Switching by age • Switching by need • Differential gene expression in the brain

  3. Microarray analysis Individual brain gene expression profiles predict behavioral phenotype Genes are socially regulated C. W. Whitfield et al., Science 302, 296 -299 (2003)

  4. Motivation • Question to answer cis-regulatory code social regulation of gene expression

  5. Data Resources • Newly sequenced honey bee genome • Microarray analyses of genes in the brain in the context of socially regulated division of labor (3129 genes, ~25% of genes in bee genome)

  6. Gene sets associated with socially regulated division of labor

  7. Data Resources • Experimentally validated Drosophila motifs, mostly involved in the regulation of embryonic development in Drosophila.

  8. Drosophila melanogastercis-regulatory motifs used in this study

  9. Hmm… We have • Bee sequences • Bee gene sets associated with social regulation • Fly motifs Using all these data resources, what can we do? What questions can we answer?

  10. Overview of methods • Hypothesis • Transcriptional networks involved in the regulation of embryonic development in Drosophila are also used to regulate adult behavioral development in honey bees. • General Scheme • Genome scan for cis-regulatory DNA motifs associated with social behavior

  11. Hmm… How to answer this question using all these data?

  12. Results #1 (test 1A) • Behaviorally related genes in honey bees have high G/C-content promoters • Most of the detected 41 motif–gene set associations involved G/C-rich motifs. • The overall Pearson’s correlation coefficient between G/C content of motif and the number of gene sets enriched for it was 0.7

  13. Results #1 • The promoters for these gene sets were in general high in G/C content ? • Three gene sets were significantly enriched for G/C-rich promoters. (test 1B) • Four gene sets with G/C content correlated significantly with brain expression levels. (“test 2”) • Using a simple threshold-based classifier, promoter G/C content can classify a significant fraction of genes in some gene sets as being up- or down-regulated (eg., 74.6%manganese-responsive genes) (test 3)

  14. Results #1 • G/C enrichment reflects regulatory phenomenon common to Drosophila too? No! • Hypergeometric tests: no association between Drosophila orthologs of the bee gene sets and high G/C promoter content • Gene Ontology (GO) analysis: The bee genes with the highest G/C-content promoters are significantly over-represented in transcriptional regulation and ectoderm, midgut, heart, and nervoussystem development. But not for Drosophila genes.

  15. Hmm… • Why high G/C? • Any thoughts? • Take a guess of any reasons?

  16. Question #1 The reasons for these bee/fly differences: • Involve enhanced transcription factor binding to known G/C-rich motifs in bees? • The presence of additional, as yet unidentified G/C-rich motifs in bees? • Species differences in methylation? • Species differences in gene expression? • Genes with brain-specific patterns of expression are known to have high G/C content promoters in humans

  17. Results #2 • Behaviorally related genes in honey bees are enriched for cis-regulatory motifs of Hairy, CF1, Adf1, Dri and Snail • Factor out the effects of G/C content • Use local background in Stubb searching, and require more enriched for the motif than for G/C content • Use partial correlation coefficients

  18. motif-gene set associationsvia enrichment or correlation analysis

  19. Results #2 • Other evidences: • “Randomized” promoter sequence as negative control: same enrichment analysis revealed no statistically significant associations • For these 5 motifs, the genome has more promoters with extremely high Stubb scores than expected by chance • GO analysis: genes • for Adf1 and Dri are significantly associated with nervous system development • for Hairy are significantly associated with sensory organ development

  20. Results #2 • Known functions of the corresponding transcription factors • Orthologs in bee genome show high degree of sequence identity for the DNA binding domains • However, the motif-gene set associations we found for honey bee were not detected in fly => specific to honey be social behavior?

  21. Result #3 • Patterns of occurrence of Hairy, Snail and GAGA-binding factor classify expression patterns of honey bee behaviorally related genes • Cases where motif-based classification accuracy is statistically significant and G/C content-based classification accuracy is less so • SVM classified up- and down- regulated using all motifs got 71% accuracy with p=0.00018. (p>0.1 for using G/C content alone)

  22. Classification of brain gene expression (up- or down-regulated) on basis of pattern of (single) motif occurrences

  23. Result #4 • Cis-regulatory motifs show combinatorial regulation of honey bee behaviorally related genes • Pairs of cis-regulatory binding sites co-occur in the promoter regions of our genes • A cohesive set of 7 transcription factors (Adf1, Hairy, CF1 and GAGA again, plus AbdB, Zeste, Eve) have significant pairwise interaction

  24. Combinatorial interactions of transcription factors

  25. Hmm… • How to identify the pairs of cis-regulatory binding sites co-occur in the promoter regions ?

  26. Conclusion • Differences in motif-gene set associations and promoter G/C content between honey bee and Drosophila might reflect unique aspects of gene regulation associated with social regulation • Demonstrate a robust association for social behavior, brain gene expression, and distributions of transcription factor binding sites throughout the genome • Transcriptional networks involved in the regulation of Drosophila embryonic development are re-used by nature for adult behavioral functions

  27. Thanks!

  28. Outline • Motivation • Data resources • Overview of methods • Results & discussion • Conclusion

More Related