1 / 29

ACROSS-BREED TABLE 2004 with year 2002 Angus base

ACROSS-BREED TABLE 2004 with year 2002 Angus base. Dale Van Vleck Larry Cundiff. Basic Information. 1) Breed of sire solutions from MARC Represent samples of sires 2) EPD from breed associations EPD for animals born in 2002 EPD for bulls used at MARC

rue
Download Presentation

ACROSS-BREED TABLE 2004 with year 2002 Angus base

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACROSS-BREED TABLE 2004with year 2002 Angus base Dale Van Vleck Larry Cundiff

  2. Basic Information 1) Breed of sire solutions from MARC Represent samples of sires 2) EPD from breed associations EPD for animals born in 2002 EPD for bulls used at MARC Difference represents "what if“ year 2002 bulls had been used at MARC

  3. 3) Adjust MARC solutions to year 2002 MARC (ADJ) = MARC + b (EPD02Y - EPDMARC) Compares breeds as if had been year 2002 sires 4) Difference EPD for bull i from EPD02 (breed Y) MARC (ADJ,Y) + [EPD(Y,i) - EPD02Y]

  4. 5) Table adjustment for breed Y bull relative to breed X (Angus) bull: [MARC (ADJ,Y) - MARC(ADJ,X)] minus [EPD02Y - EPD02X]

  5. 6) Compare individual bulls (i, j, k) i, breed Y j, breed Z k, breed X (Angus) Table for Y + EPD(Y, i) Table for Z + EPD(Z, j) 0 + EPD(X, k) (Angus)

  6. MARC Breed of Sire Solutions Calves from another breed of dam Angus Hereford AN, HE, BR to MARC III (PI, RP, HE, AN) SI, LI, CH, GE, BS, BM to MARC III Red Angus to HE, AN, MARC III BS, BM to AN, MARC III Need to adjust for lack of heterosis HE x HE AN x III AN x AN HE x III RA x AN BS x III BS x AN BM x III

  7. IN 2004 British (HE, AN, SH, SD, RA) X (HE, AN) (HE, AN, RA) X (MARC III: HE, AN, RP, PI) Continental (BV, SI, LI, CH, GE, PI, TA, SA) X (HE, AN) (SI, LI, CH, GE) X (MARC III) Indicus (BRN) X (HE, AN, MARC III) (BRS: .375 BRN + .625 AN) X (AN, MARC III) (BFM: .50 BRN + .25 HE + .25 SH) X (AN, MARC III)

  8. Preadjust to 100% heterozygosity Need estimates of Direct heterosis Maternal heterosis

  9. 1) From H by A diallels (HH, HA, AH, AA) Estimate direct heterosis; 3.0 lb for BWT 14.7 lb for WWT 30.4 lb for YWT 2) Adjust MWWT of cows from diallel for direct heterosis Estimate maternal heterosis; 23.0 lb for MWWT

  10. 3) Adjust BWT, WWT, YWT for lack of direct heterozygosity Include HH, AA calves Proceed with across-breed analyses 4) Adjust MWWT for lack of direct and maternal heterozygosity Include HH, AA cows Proceed with across-breed analysis

  11. Contributions to Changes from 2003 National Cattle Evaluations Limousin base change Charolais, base and parameters Salers, inter breed base Others ?? YWT Last year mid-March for 2002 calves This year mid-April for 2002 calves For MWWT RA, with many more records (74 of 186) More HE, AN (160); SI, LI, CH, GE (75)

  12. Critical calculation — Breeds as of 2002 Differences from 2003 update Reflect changes in breeds and changes in analyses General, Angus more similar to others Others, little relative change

  13. BWT to Base Year (2001 and 2002) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford 4.5 4.6 Maine-Anjou 7.2 6.6 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 4.1 3.8 Shorthorn 7.0 7.0 Pinzgauer 5.0 5.0 South Devon 4.1 4.1 Tarentaise 3.2 3.2 Brahman 12.3 12.5 Salers 3.8 3.4 Simmental 6.9 5.7 Red Angus 1.5 1.5 Limousin 4.5 4.3 Braunvieh 5.1 5.0 Charolais 9.4 9.4 Brangus 5.1 5.1 Beefmaster 7.8 7.5 Update Update

  14. WWT to Base Year (2001 and 2002) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -2.4 -2.0 Maine-Anjou 0.1 -1.5 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 9.9 8.5 Shorthorn 10.3 9.4 Pinzgauer -5.2 -6.1 South Devon 3.7 3.8 Tarentaise 7.8 7.1 Brahman 15.8 15.9 Salers 7.6 7.7 Simmental 22.7 21.0 Red Angus -8.2 -8.4 Limousin 1.9 0.6 Braunvieh 2.6 1.6 Charolais 21.7 21.6 Brangus 7.0 5.9 Beefmaster 10.6 10.0 Update Update

  15. YWT to Base Year (2001 and 2002) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -20.1 -18.7 Maine-Anjou -25.9 -28.4 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh-17.3 -17.2 Shorthorn 2.0 -0.5 Pinzgauer -37.4 -38.8 South Devon 0.0 -0.7 Tarentaise -27.2 -28.6 Brahman -43.4 -43.1 Salers -1.3 0.1 Simmental 16.5 14.7 Red Angus -17.1 -16.3 Limousin -19.1 -21.4 Braunvieh -42.5 -44.1 Charolais 19.6 20.4 Brangus -18.4 -11.1 Beefmaster -22.2 -16.0 Update Update

  16. MILK to Base Year (2001 and 2002) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -21.2 -21.8 Maine-Anjou -5.0 -5.9 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 4.8 2.0 Shorthorn -2.7 -2.9 Pinzgauer -12.0-11.8 South Devon -8.7 -7.3 Tarentaise 2.3 2.3 Brahman 16.8 15.0 Salers 2.3 0.0 Simmental -0.4 -1.4 Red Angus -13.7 -10.7 Limousin -11.7 -15.2 Braunvieh 5.8 4.8 Charolais -6.0 -8.7 Update Update

  17. BWT: Table Factors to Compare EPD ofBulls of Different Breeds (2004) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford 3.3 3.4 Maine-Anjou 6.66.7 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 5.3 5.4 Shorthorn 7.8 7.8 Pinzgauer 7.7 7.7 South Devon 6.7 6.7 Tarentaise 3.6 3.6 Brahman 13.0 13.0 Salers 5.1 4.9 Simmental 6.4 6.4 Red Angus 3.6 3.6 Limousin 5.8 4.5 Braunvieh 6.6 6.5 Charolais 10.5 10.5 Brangus 5.7 5.7 Beefmaster 9.99.7 Update Update

  18. Example: BWT If Breed Across-Breed Breed EPD Table EPD Angus 2.6 + 0.0 = 2.6 Simmental 3.2 + 6.4 = 9.6 Red Angus 0.6 + 3.6 = 4.2

  19. WWT: Table Factors to Compare EPD ofBulls of Different Breeds (2004) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -2.4 -2.0 Maine-Anjou 17.9 17.6 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 7.9 7.1 Shorthorn 31.2 31.4 Pinzgauer 28.2 28.3 South Devon 21.5 21.7 Tarentaise 29.8 30.1 Brahman 34.7 34.8 Salers 28.4 30.7 Simmental 21.6 22.4 Red Angus -1.2 -1.4 Limousin 23.5 1.8 Braunvieh 30.3 30.0 Charolais 41.1 38.4 Brangus 20.1 20.0 Beefmaster 38.5 39.0 Update Update

  20. YWT: Table Factors to Compare EPD ofBulls of Different Breeds (2004) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -15.1 -13.7 Maine-Anjou 5.8 5.5 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh -20.3 -21.1 Shorthorn 44.5 44.5 Pinzgauer 24.9 25.5 South Devon 40.5 40.8 Tarentaise 12.8 13.4 Brahman -5.5 -4.4 Salers 40.6 46.1 Simmental 21.1 21.9 Red Angus -0.1 0.7 Limousin 20.5 -19.9 Braunvieh 13.5 13.9 Charolais 57.8 53.4 Brangus 11.1 20.4 Beefmaster 29.7 37.9 Update Update

  21. MILK: Table Factors to Compare EPD ofBulls of Different Breeds (2004) Breed 2003 2004 Breed 2003 2004 Hereford -16.2 -17.8 Maine-Anjou 8.0 7.6 Angus 0.0 0.0 Gelbvieh 3.8 1.7 Shorthorn 12.0 12.1 Pinzgauer 6.0 6.1 South Devon 2.1 3.5 Tarentaise 17.8 17.8 Brahman 26.1 24.6 Salers 11.3 9.0 Simmental 9.0 10.0 Red Angus -10.7 -7.8 Limousin 0.2 -15.9 Braunvieh 23.1 22.2 Charolais 2.0 2.6 Update Update

  22. ACROSS-BREED TABLE 2004with year 2002 Angus base Dale Van Vleck Larry Cundiff

  23. Breed EPD (-2 years) BWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 AN 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 SH 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 SI 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.6 3.8 4.0 3.2 3.2 2.4 3.1 1.9 LI 0.6 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 2.4 CH 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 GE 0.3 0.2 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.0 SA 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 -1.3 1.3 1.1

  24. MARC ADJUSTED (year - 2) BWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 5.6 5.3 5.6 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.7 4.9 4.3 4.5 4.6 AN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 SH 7.4 8.0 8.0 7.7 7.5 7.9 7.9 6.6 6.9 7.0 7.0 SI 7.7 8.9 9.4 9.1 8.4 8.5 8.4 7.4 6.1 6.9 5.7 LI 4.0 6.2 6.6 6.2 6.4 6.9 6.0 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.3 CH 8.0 9.2 9.5 8.9 10.3 10.6 11.2 9.5 9.3 9.4 9.4 GE 6.7 7.9 7.7 7.3 7.2 7.4 6.9 5.0 4.2 4.1 3.8 SA 4.4 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 4.8 5.3 3.7 1.3 3.8 3.4

  25. Breed EPD (-2 years) WWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 24 24 23 27 30 32 32 34 34 34 35 AN 23 25 24 25 28 29 30 31 32 34 35 SH 12 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 SI 8 7 8 10 34 37 37 35 34 35 34 LI 4 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 12 34 CH 8 9 10 4 12 13 13 14 14 15 18 GE 4 4 5 5 5 33 34 35 34 36 36 SA 7 8 9 9 10 7 12 12 13 1312

  26. MARC ADJUSTED (year - 2) WWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 10 8 8 6 5 4 6 3 -5 -2 -2 AN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH 14 19 17 13 14 13 13 9 9 10 9 SI 35 37 39 32 30 26 32 25 23 23 21 LI 10 16 18 12 14 13 10 2 3 2 1 CH 22 27 29 17 26 26 28 20 21 22 22 GE 20 28 28 24 26 24 21 12 10 10 8 SA 15 13 14 10 12 10 14 8 7 8 8

  27. Breed EPD (-2 years) YWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 38 41 39 46 50 54 54 57 56 58 60 AN 39 42 42 43 51 53 55 57 60 63 65 SH 20 21 20 20 19 18 18 18 20 20 20 SI 14 12 14 16 52 52 60 58 56 58 58 LI 8 12 13 15 15 17 19 21 22 23 64 CH 12 14 15 5 21 22 23 23 24 25 32 GE 9 8 9 9 10 58 62 62 61 66 69 SA 12 13 15 15 16 11 19 20 21 2119

  28. MARC ADJUSTED (year - 2) YWT Year of update Breed 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 HE 5 8 7 1 -5 -3 1 -9 -28 -20 -19 AN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SH 12 18 19 13 9 13 13 0 -1 2 0 SI 54 60 64 46 43 48 45 19 17 16 15 LI -11 4 6 -4 -6 0 -2 -20 -19 -19 -21 CH 25 36 39 17 32 39 41 17 17 20 20 GE 11 21 20 15 11 15 4 -15 -17 -17 -17 SA 4 8 10 4 1 3 12 -2 0 -1 0

More Related