1 / 18

Controversies over Evolutionary Psychology

Controversies over Evolutionary Psychology. Overview of The Day Criticisms of Evolutionary Theory Criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology. Criticisms of Evolutionary Theory. It’s just a theory The evidence is weak How can you prove a theory when the evidence is all in the past. Responses.

sailor
Download Presentation

Controversies over Evolutionary Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Controversies over Evolutionary Psychology Overview of The Day Criticisms of Evolutionary TheoryCriticisms of Evolutionary Psychology

  2. Criticisms of Evolutionary Theory • It’s just a theory • The evidence is weak • How can you prove a theory when the evidence is all in the past

  3. Responses • No theory is ever completely proven. • Must be stated so that it can be disproved (“Falseifiability”) • Weight of empirical evidence • Fossil record • Similarities among species • Contemporaneous studies • Grants’ study of Darwin’s finches • the Flynn effect • Compressed evolution with fruit flies • Computer simulations

  4. Religious Criticisms • Idea of intelligent design and creator • Literal interpretation of scriptures • People are apart from natural world (great chain of being) • Famous Scopes trial

  5. Responses • Creation as process (rather than product) in not incompatible with religion • Are we part of the natural world? • Is there a great chain of being from lower to higher (and better) forms? • We share about 95% of our genes with chimpanzees • We have about 30,000 genes, rice has about 70,000

  6. Religion involves matters of faith and morality; science involves theories about about the natural world based on empiricism • Religion and science are different spheres • Religion: Right and wrong; good and evil • Science: What is, why, and how it works • S

  7. Fears over Evolutionary Psychology • 1. If some differences are biological, then this could justify oppression. • 2. If aggression in innate, then we might begin to view violence as natural and acceptable. • 3. Psychological mechanisms imply lack of free will and abdication of responsibility

  8. Fear 1: biological differences could justify oppression • EP’s response: • Scientific and philosophical views of all stripes have been used to justify oppression • Marxism emphasizes blank slate and equality • Most biological differences among humans are trivial (humans are similar in most ways) • Two people selected at random share about 99.98% of their genes • Group differences do not imply individual differences

  9. Fear 1: biological differences could justify oppression • Fairness does not require sameness • Equality under the law • Voting rights • Laws against discrimination • Sex, race, religion, ethnicity, age • Knowledge of one’s own personal uniqueness can be liberating

  10. What about social Darwinism? • Are the rich rich and the poor poor because of innate characteristics? • EP’s response • High level of upward and downward social mobility(about 50% of families change position in income quintiles every decade) • Only about one sixth of a male’s SES can be explained by genetic factors • Reproduction is the currency of natural selection, not wealth

  11. Fear 2: If aggression is innate, this could lead to viewing violence as natural • EP’s Response • The naturalistic fallacy (if it exists, it must be good) is just that: a fallacy. • Just because something exists does not mean that it is good or moral.

  12. Fear 2: If aggression is innate, this could lead to viewing violence as natural • Deal with aggression with a realistic view of human nature, not a romantic ideal • People have both base and noble instincts • Trust people but cut the cards • Balance of power and institutions to deal with conflict

  13. Is Modern Civilization Responsible for Aggression and Violence? • Among pre-agricultural peoples • often, 1/2 of men have killed someone • battles more frequent • causalities are proportionally higher • prisoners are fewer

  14. Fear 3: Psychological mechanisms imply lack of free will and abdication of responsibility • “Don’t blame me, my genes made me do it.” (sleeping around, murder, oppression) • EP’s response • This argument is fallacious • it can be raised by any explanation of behavior • Twinkie Defense, Abuse Excuse • Confusing explanation with exculpation • To understand is not to forgive

  15. Fear 3: Psychological mechanisms imply lack of free will and abdication of responsibility • Many evil regimes have been based on a core belief that human nature is malleable and that people can be socialized to do anything.

  16. Many fears about EP are based on Misunderstandings of EP • Misunderstandings: • Human behavior is genetically determined • If it’s evolutionary, we can’t change it • Current mechanisms are optimally designed

  17. Critics of EP • Utopian visionaries • Social engineers • Professional advice-givers • Management consultants • Child care “experts”

  18. Summary • Criticisms of Evolutionary Theory • Criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology • Critics • Misunderstandings

More Related