1 / 18

A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in Forest

A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in Forest. Rachel Jacobs 1 , Steve Benford 1 , Mark Selby 1 , Mike Golembewski 1 , Dominic Price 1 and Gabriella Giannachi 2. 1. Mixed Reality Laboratory & Horizon University of Nottingham, UK

sakura
Download Presentation

A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in Forest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in Forest Rachel Jacobs1, Steve Benford1, Mark Selby1, Mike Golembewski1, Dominic Price1 and Gabriella Giannachi2 1. Mixed Reality Laboratory & Horizon University of Nottingham, UK 2. Centre for Intermedia University of Exeter Exeter, UK CHI 2013

  2. Outline • Introductions • Related work • The Artwork - A Conversation Between Trees • Approach to The Study • Findings • Discussion • Conclusion

  3. Introduction(1/2) • Global and long-term nature of climate change data defies easy or immediate comprehension.

  4. Introduction(2/2) • A particular group of artists in engaging the public with climate change data. • How this group of artists interpreted and presented scientific data as part of an artwork. • Presenting a detailed account of the design of this artwork from the ground up. • Artists, the public, but also of a climate scientist.

  5. Related Work • Environmentally engaged artists • Syntheses of science, action and art • How in following this approach artists have to walk a line between the artistic and scientific treatment of data.

  6. A Conversation Between Trees(1/4) • Forest Gallery Visitors

  7. A Conversation Between Trees(2/4) • Environmental sensor data • Local temperature, humidity, decibel and CO2 • Visualized on two large displays that face each other across the gallery

  8. A Conversation Between Trees(3/4) • Climate Machine • Visualizes recorded and predicted global CO2 levels by slowly burning circular graphs onto large circular disks of recycled paper.

  9. A Conversation Between Trees(4/4) • Visitors • Walking in the local UK forest during which they enact being a sensor with mobile phone

  10. Approach to The Study(1/3) • The artist’s perspective: • The designer of the climate machine • The developer of the visualisations mobile application • The collaborating artist in Brazil

  11. Approach to The Study(2/3) • The visitor’s perspective: • Semi-structured interviews that took place immediately after the experience

  12. Approach to The Study(3/3) • The climate scientist’s perspective: • Capture their perspective of the work and their view of the role of the artists’ engagements with climate change.

  13. Findings • Engaging audiences with climate data • Embedded and embodied experience • Performing data • Slowness • Liveness • Multiple Interpretations and Dialogue

  14. Discussion(1/2) • The role of the artists • Not about presenting canonical interpretations of data • provoke an emotional response.

  15. Discussion(2/2) • How artists provoke engagement and interpretation • To encourage a sensory engagement with data • To bring a unique temporality to engagement with the climate data • the juxtaposition of different elements that present contrasting datasets – Live, recorded, and predicted

  16. Conclusion(1/3) • Contribution • A group of artists used to engage with scientific climate change data • By triangulating between the perspectives of the artists, visitors and a climate change scientist, to understand how these worked

  17. Conclusion(2/3) • Three broad strategies • Embodying scientific data in various material ways so as to provide a rich sensory and aesthetic experience • Adopting a performative temporal structure that combined both slowness with liveness;

  18. Conclusion(3/3) • Juxtaposing multiple, contrasting and yet related, elements so as to invite comparisons while opening up spaces between them for interpretation and dialogue

More Related