1 / 22

Communicating Hazard Risk ( Wilson and Crouch, in Cutter: Ch 18 )

Geography 106b Hazards. Communicating Hazard Risk ( Wilson and Crouch, in Cutter: Ch 18 ). communication scenarios forms of risk communication message-focused source-focused audience/context-focused limitations. Risk Communication Scenarios. low risk – low concern

sandra_john
Download Presentation

Communicating Hazard Risk ( Wilson and Crouch, in Cutter: Ch 18 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geography 106bHazards Communicating Hazard Risk(Wilson and Crouch, in Cutter: Ch 18) • communication scenarios • forms of risk communication • message-focused • source-focused • audience/context-focused • limitations Geog 152b

  2. Risk Communication Scenarios low risk – low concern • much historical hazard event data • little communication effort low risk – high concern • much historical hazard event data, relatively low risk but high public concern to regulate high risk – low concern • risk exists, but behaviour change slow uncertain risk – mixed concern • benefits typically better understood than risks, stakeholder disagreement and conflict Geog 152b

  3. Exercise:Selecting Hazards Deserving of Risk Communication Resources Which of the following deserves more resources for warning people about the seriousness of the hazard to humans?: • aflatoxin • dioxin Geog 152b

  4. The Social Context of Risk Communication Spending • while aflatoxin is at least as serious a threat as dioxin, dioxin risk communication typically receives more attention and funding • why? Health Canada’s current position on dioxins (detailed) Health Canada’s current position on aflatoxin (buried – 15 ppb in inspected food) Geog 152b

  5. Message-Focused Communication • technical risk information • focus on getting the numbers right • scientific experts deliver message • typically impersonal (single audience) • non-local • contains both factual and inferential information (see last day) • emphasis on risk comparisons to get the message across • e.g, EPA Citizen’s Guide to Radon Risk Geog 152b

  6. Risk ComparisonsInvoluntary Risk: Deaths Per Person Per Year • create a mental picture of the risk of natural hazards impacts from the next few tables Source: http://www.psandman.com/articles/cma-appb.htm Geog 152b

  7. Risk Comparisons: Various Hazards: Risk of Death Per Million Persons Source: http://www.psandman.com/articles/cma-appb.htm Geog 152b

  8. Risk Comparisons:Hazards That Increase Risk of Death by 1 in 1 Million/Year Source: http://www.psandman.com/articles/cma-appb.htm Geog 152b

  9. Risk Comparisons: Technological/Natural: Probability of Disaster Killing 100 or 1000 Persons Source: http://www.psandman.com/articles/cma-appb.htm Geog 152b

  10. Exercise:Uncertainty and Decision-Making from the following table: • select the 3 hazards most in need of further regulation • select the 3 hazards least in need of further regulation Source: http://www.psandman.com/articles/cma-appb.htm Geog 152b

  11. Limitations of Message-Focused Communication • impersonal • context independent • condescending and patriarchal • lack of historical event data for key hazards Geog 152b

  12. Source-Focused Communication • focus on ensuring the source is believable • basis in social engineering/marketing • more personalized (re: source) • more localized • contains both factual and inferential but also cultural symbolic information (see last day) • risk comparisons still used • e.g, local physician, an expert who is a resident of area affected by the hazard, similar to audience Geog 152b

  13. Trusted Sources of Information? Who will be your message source for: Americans, Canadians, Japanese for the following message:? “Canada’s beef is safe for human consumption.” Geog 152b

  14. Confidence in Information Source for Health Risk Information 1992 Geog 152b

  15. Confidence in Information Source for Health Risk Information 2004 • “a lot” of confidence increased 1992-2004: • medical doctors, university scientists • “a lot” of confidence decreased 1992-2004: • public environmental groups, government Geog 152b

  16. Limitations of Source-Focused Communication • still impersonal (source-centered not audience centered) • manipulative and “clever” • potentially subversive of message content • credible sources hard to find • understanding of sources of audience concern potentially ignored Geog 152b

  17. Audience-Focused Communication • focus on understanding the meaning of hazard risk for audience • trust in “sources” (but, now more two-way communication) built slowly • trust built outside of crisis situations • attention to conflict and controversy • more personalized (re: audience) • often very localized • contains both factual, inferential information (see last day) • risk comparisons rare • e.g.s, ? Geog 152b

  18. Limitations of Audience-Focused Communication • trust is difficult to develop • if trust is lost, very difficult to regain • costly to implement “tailored” messages (since single message, single source, single audience unrealistic) Geog 152b

  19. Technical vs Narrative Messages • Risk Communication Experiment: Golding et al. (1992) Risk Analysis, 12(1): 27-35 • hypothesis: narrative message better than technical at gaining attention, increasing knowledge, and altering behaviour • radon messages in three communities via • 1) technical newspaper (Clinton) • 2) narrative newspaper (Fitchburg) • 3) no messages by experimenters (Worchester) • subdivision of sample: • dependent = baseline and follow-up survey • independent = only follow-up survey Geog 152b

  20. Technical vs Narrative Messages:Results • getting attention: readership higher for technical messages • retaining attention: readership declined slower for narrative messages Geog 152b

  21. Technical vs Narrative Messages:Results • enhanced concern: for readers of technical information • reduced concern: for readers of narrative information • how message is delivered matters! Comparison had no specific information about radon from researchers Geog 152b

  22. Message Effectiveness • Which message do you feel is the most effective? • radon rooftops • radon person on the street • Why (try to use terminology from recent lectures)? Geog 152b

More Related