1 / 34

Analysis of tox & deg data

Analysis of tox & deg data. Bas Kooijman Dept theoretical biology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Bas@bio.vu.nl http://www.bio.vu.nl/thb. Maarssen, 2004/10/21. Contents. Biodegradation microbial flocs co-metabolism adaptation Foundation Biomass imbedding

sasse
Download Presentation

Analysis of tox & deg data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of tox & deg data Bas Kooijman Dept theoretical biology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Bas@bio.vu.nl http://www.bio.vu.nl/thb Maarssen, 2004/10/21

  2. Contents • Biodegradation • microbial flocs • co-metabolism • adaptation • Foundation Biomass • imbedding • modes of operation • Introduction • DEB theory • DEB laboratory • Effects of toxicants • sublethal effects • tumour induction & growth • lethal effects • extrapolation Maarssen, 2004/10/21

  3. Dynamic Energy Budget theory for metabolic organization • links levels of organization • molecules, cells, individuals, populations, ecosystems • scales in space and time: scale separation • interplay between biology, mathematics, • physics, chemistry, earth system sciences • framework of general systems theory • quantitative; first principles only • equivalent of theoretical physics • fundamental to biology; many practical applications • (bio)production, medicine, (eco)toxicity, climate change

  4. Space-time scales Each process has its characteristic domain of space-time scales system earth space ecosystem population When changing the space-time scale, new processes will become important other will become less important Individuals are special because of straightforward energy/mass balances individual cell time molecule

  5. Some DEB pillars • life cycle perspective of individual as primary target • embryo, juvenile, adult (levels in metabolic organization) • life as coupled chemical transformations (reserve & structure) • time, energy & mass balances • surface area/ volume relationships (spatial structure & transport) • homeostasis (stoichiometric constraints via Synthesizing Units) • syntrophy (basis for symbioses, evolutionary perspective) • intensive/extensive parameters: body size scaling

  6. defecation feeding food faeces assimilation reserve somatic maintenance maturity maintenance  1- maturation reproduction growth maturity offspring structure Basic DEB scheme

  7. Electronic DEB laboratory http://www.bio.vu.nl/thb/deb/deblab/ (free download site) DEBtool for research applications open source (Octave, Matlab) covers full range of DEB research (fundamental + applied) advanced regression routines for simultaneous model fitting DEBtox for routine ecotoxicity applications load module

  8. DEBtox Present tasks: analysis of bioassays on survival, body growth, reproduction, population growth NEC (including profile likelihood), ECx-time curves OECD/ISO report on analysis of toxicity data NOEC methods: not recommended, for historic continuity only ECx methods: fixed exposure times only, descriptive Biology-based methods: DEBtox; process-based OECD-meeting Braunschweig 1996: stimulate exposure-explicit regression methods DEBtox: only exposure time-explicit method presently available Near-future extensions: biodegradation models, multi-sample analysis, population consequences profile likelihoods for more parameters (elimination rate, toxicity parameters) Future extensions: more bioassays, sensitivity-variations, ecosystem effects, predictions based on physical chemistry mixture toxicity, coupling to exposure models, implementation in environmental risk assessment

  9. Concentration ranges of chemicals • too little • def: variations in concentration come with variations in effects • enough • def: variations in concentration within this range hardly affect • physiological behaviour of individuals • too much • def: variations in concentration come with variations in effects • e.g. water concentration can be too much even for fish • no basic difference between toxic and non-toxic chemicals • “too little” and “enough” can have zero range for some chemicals • Implication: lower & upper NEC for each compound

  10. Effects on organisms • Process-based perspective on disturbances • chemicals, temperature, parasites, noise • exposure-time explicit methods (response surface) • Primary target: individuals • some effects at sub-organism level can be compensated (NEC) • Effects on populations derived from individuals • energy budget basic to population dynamics • Parameters of budget model individual specific • and (partly) under genetic control

  11. Models for toxic effects • Three model components: • kinetics • external concentration  internal concentration • example: one-compartment kinetics • change in target parameter(s) • internal concentration  value of target parameter(s) • example: linear relationship • physiology • value of parameter  endpoint (survival, reproduction) • example: DEB model

  12. assimilation  maintenance costs defecation feeding food faeces growth costs assimilation reproduction costs reserve  hazard to embryo somatic maintenance  7 maturity maintenance  1-  maint tumour induction 6 maturation reproduction u endocr. disruption growth 7  lethal effects: hazard rate Mode of action affects translation to pop level 8 maturity offspring structure tumour 6 Modes of action of toxicants

  13. Toxic effect on survival Effect of Dieldrin on survival of Poecilia One-compartment kinetics Hazard rate is linear in internal concentration killing rate 0.038 l g-1 d-1 elimination rate 0.712 d-1 NEC 4.49 g l-1

  14. DEB-based effects on body growth • Indirect effects • indicator: effects on ultimate size at constant food • decrease of assimilation rate (food intake, digestion) • increase of specific maintenance costs • Direct effects • indicator: no effects on ultimate size at constant food • increase of costs for synthesis of biomass (structural)

  15. Effect on assimilation weight1/3, mg1/3 time, d CuCl2 mg/kg Data from Klok & de Roos 1996 NEC = 4.45 mg CuCl2 /kg on Lumbricus rubellus

  16. DEB-based effects on reproduction • Indirect effects • indicator: effects on onset of reproduction • decrease of assimilation rate (food intake, digestion) • increase of specific maintenance costs • increase of costs for synthesis of biomass (structural) • Direct effects • indicator: no effects on onset of reproduction • increase of costs for the synthesis of offspring • decrease of survival probability at birth

  17. Direct effect on reproduction g Cd/l 0 0.2 0.4 cum. # young/female 0.8 1 2 Effect on hazard NEC = 0.023 g Cd/l time, d

  18. Effects on populations At constant food density: At variable food density: individual-based modelling of populations requires modelling of resources

  19. Population effectscan depend on food density 3,4-dichloroaniline direct effect on reproduction potassium metavanadate effect on maintenance Population growth of rotifer Brachionus rubens at 20˚C for different algal concentrations

  20. Maintenance first Chlorella-fed batch cultures of Daphnia magna, 20°C neonates at 0 d: 10 winter eggs at 37 d: 0, 0, 1, 3, 1, 38 Kooijman, 1985 Toxicity at population level. In: Cairns, J. (ed) Multispecies toxicity testing. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 143 - 164 30106 cells.day-1 400 Maitenance requirements: 6 cells.sec-1.daphnid-1 300 300 number of daphnids max number of daphnids 200 200 100 100 106 cells.day-1 0 0 6 12 30 60 120 8 11 15 18 21 24 28 32 35 37 30 time, d

  21. Food intake at carrying capacity metavanadate sodium bromide 2,6-dimethylquinoline 103 cells/daphnid.d log mg Br/l log mg DMQ/l log mg V/l potassium dichromate colchicine 9-aminoacridine 103 cells/daphnid.d log mg AA/l log mg Col/l log mg K2Cr2O7/l

  22. Advantages of DEBtox method • effective use of all data • smaller number of parameters per data-point • reduction of required test animals • simultaneous use of data on multiple end points • more informative • standard statistics (NOEC, ECx, slope) can be calculated from • new ones (NEC, tolerance conc., elimination rate), but not vice versa • process-based characterizations of effect • independent of exposure time • allows NEC estimates for risk assessments to replace NOEC • tight link of toxicity with pharmacology/physiology/ecology • extrapolations are facilitated • acute  chronic; individual  population; lab  field • one species  other species; one chemical  other chemicals

  23. Biodegradation • Uptake of substrates is core-element of DEB theory • Special issues • microbes typically grow in flocs • this limits access to substrate by several orders of magnitude • adaptation to new substrates • short term: by expression of genes for this substrate • long term: by change in species-composition • co-metabolism • uptake of new substrate can depend on that of other substrates • co-limitation (e.g. by nutrients such as N-compounds) • this is a core-element of DEB theory

  24. Yield vs growth Streptococcus bovis, Russell & Baldwin (1979) Marr-Pirt (no reserve) DEB 1/yield, mmol glucose/ mg cells spec growth rate yield 1/spec growth rate, 1/h Russell & Cook (1995): this is evidence for down-regulation of maintenance at low growth rates DEB theory: high reserve density gives high growth rates structure requires maintenance, reserves not

  25. Growth of microbial flocs • Microbes in sewage treatment plants grow in flocs • < 10% of microbes is metabolic active • Growth limited by transport of substrate into the floc • core starves to death • substrate  living + dead biomass (detritus) • flocculated growth rate rF • << suspension growth rate r • (upto factor 1000) • 2 extra parameters: • size at which floc destabilizes • penetration rate of substrate into floc Brandt & Kooijman 2000 Two parameters account for the flocculated growth of microbes in biodegradation assays. Biotech & Bioeng70: 677-684

  26. Co-metabolism Co-metabolic degradation of 3-chloroaniline by Rhodococcus with glucose as primary substrate Data from Schukat et al, 1983 Brandt et al, 2003 Water Research 37, 4843-4854

  27. Diauxic growth Adaptation to different substrates is controlled by: enzyme turnover 0.15 h-1 preference ratio 0.5 acetate cells Substrate conc., mM biomass conc., OD433 oxalate time, h Growth of acetate-adapted Pseudomonas oxalaticus OX1 data from Dijkhuizen et al 1980 SU-based DEB curves fitted by Bernd Brandt Brandt et al, 2004 Water Research 38, 1003-1013

  28. Netherlands Center for Environmental Modeling Bas Kooijman VUA • Members NCEM: http://www.ncem.nl • Foundation for Biomathematical Assessments • Biomass (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam) • effects of toxicants on organisms, bio-degradation • Radboud Center for Environmental Modelling • RCEM (Radboud Univ. Nijmegen) • emission, transport & transformation of chemicals • Dept Indust. Ecol.; Inst. Environ. Sciences • IE-MCL (Leiden University) • life-cycle studies for chemicals and products • Aims: • collaboration • coordinated research acquisition Dik van de Meent RUN + RIVM Bilthoven Gjalt Huppes LU

  29. Aims of Biomass • stimulation interaction between dept Theoretical Biology (TB-VU), • and companies, governmental institutions • modelling, data analysis, computational sciences, advice on setup of experiments • offering talented scientists opportunities to contribute in this interaction • stimulate talented students to specialize in research areas of the foundation • development of applications of Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory: • ecotoxicology, risk assessment, nutrition, medical biology and biotechnology • organizing specialized courses • research areas of foundation,application of math. & computer science in biology

  30. Modes of operation • person-oriented research acquisition • partners hire scientists on part-time basis (restrictions on info-flux) • employed by & detached at the foundation (Amsterdam) • partner controls work package for specified amount of time • project-oriented research acquisition • clients sponsor projects by PhD students or postdocs who are • part-time (80%) employed by VU (NOW, STW, EU projects) • temporarily supplemented by the foundation on project basis • support for selected students • financial support for explicit commitments • excellent study results (full focus on study) • specialization in mathematical biology • information supply: courses • generation of resources, stimulation of research

  31. Benefits for partnerswho support foundation staff • hire highly skilled modelers on part-time basis • and use them for data analysis, advice on experimental research • benefit from a team that supports these specialists in • fundamental research, data analysis, statistics, computer science • contact & train talented students via traineeships • who may become future employees • access to & influence on new developments in DEB applications • & fundamental research that generates these applications

  32. Benefits for clientswho sponsor projects • solve a particular problem using knowledge of experts • who are supported by TB-VU and foundation staff • and who participate in the Netherlands Center for Environmental Modeling • and have assistance from students with traineeships • get into contact with talented young scientists and students • who may become future employees

  33. Permanent foundation staff members First permanent staff member: Tjalling Jager (0.8 fte) he has developed EUSES at RIVM Analysis of ecotoxicity & biodegradation data, such as those from standardized tests (ISO/OECD) toxico-kinetic & effect data Prediction of transport & fate of chemicals in the environment possible effect scenarios in collaboration with RCEM in NCEM life cycle studies in collaboration with IE-CML in NCEM Aim: second permanent staff member in same field Future developments: food production/conservation, biotechnology

  34. Estimated financial costs Yearly costs in k-euro:salary 80% 69 = 86.25  0.8auditor 1room(14m2) 4exploitation 10total 84 faculty 9%financial admin 4% computer service 3% personnel service 1% general 1% (incl use library)guidance by TB-VU staff 10%total 19% 104 = 84/ (1 - 0.19) Yearly effective hours: 1280 = 1600  0.8 background research 50% contracted = 640 h/a costs per hour (excl vat): 104/ 640 = 163 euro/h 2 partners = 320 h/partner = 52 k-euro/(partner  a) Yearly index 3% PM: liability insurance

More Related