1 / 13

Ensuring Students are “Making the Grade” Through Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning

Ensuring Students are “Making the Grade” Through Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning. Testing Data from 04-05. Action Plan. Staff and community members were concerned with the writing scores PTA meetings were held to address the 58% in writing

sauda
Download Presentation

Ensuring Students are “Making the Grade” Through Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ensuring Students are “Making the Grade” Through Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning

  2. Testing Data from 04-05

  3. Action Plan • Staff and community members were concerned with the writing scores • PTA meetings were held to address the 58% in writing • Our action plan needed to be changed from reading to writing

  4. Professional Development • Continuous improvement team came together to analyze scores, there were red flags in the areas of conventions (CON) & content, organization, and style (COS) • Questions came up as to how we could assess our own teaching and make it consistent within the building

  5. School needs • Did we have assumptions about who our students were? • What could we do to assess the individual students in our class and a class as a whole?

  6. Our Population • After lengthy discussions, staff came to the realization that our students came from a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds. They also came from different educational settings.

  7. What we did to understand our population better? • Our school purchased copies of A Framework for Understanding Poverty, by Ruby K. Payne, Ph.D. • We completed a book study and discussed how we could support our students using strategies from the Ruby Payne’s book.

  8. Assessing the classroom as a whole • Our CIP team came up with a school wide prompt to be given three times a year. Teachers started to score the papers in their grade level teams. First Grade Writing Sample

  9. Assessing the classroom as a whole • When grade levels shared anchor papers, it was clear that there was no common rubric. What was a 3 to one teacher was possibly a 4 in another classroom. • Created rubrics using the GLEs • From the rubrics grade levels created checklists that would be easy to use

  10. Assessing Individual Students • Our school sent two representatives to be trained in Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning (CASL) instructed by Georgea M. Langer and Amy B. Colton • CASL met the individual classroom needs Sample of CASL from our first grade team

  11. Importance of Joint Scoring • The following year, we created a professional development calendar that included time for teams to score their papers together. • The increase in dialogue led us to more consistent scoring, common areas of improvement, and opportunities to collect consistent anchor papers.

  12. What we are doing now? • We continue to look at our standardized data. • We make an action plan from the data that will help support our areas of concern. • CASL is completed monthly to help us monitor student progress.

  13. Questions? Thank you for attending!

More Related