1 / 15

Dr Venkataraman Arvind MD , MRCOphth. M.Krithiga B.S.(Optom) Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai, India

Comparison of Automated and Manual Measurements of Horizontal Corneal Diameter in Contact Lens Wearers Using Orbscan Eye Metrics Function and Orbscan 11z Corneal Topographer. Dr Venkataraman Arvind MD , MRCOphth. M.Krithiga B.S.(Optom) Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai, India.

savea
Download Presentation

Dr Venkataraman Arvind MD , MRCOphth. M.Krithiga B.S.(Optom) Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai, India

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of Automated and Manual Measurements of Horizontal Corneal Diameter in Contact LensWearers Using Orbscan Eye Metrics Function and Orbscan 11z Corneal Topographer Dr Venkataraman Arvind MD , MRCOphth. M.Krithiga B.S.(Optom) Vasan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai, India

  2. Financial disclosure • The authors have no financial interest in this study or presentation

  3. AIM • Comparison of automated and manual measurements of horizontal corneal diameter in contact lens wearers using Orbscan Eye Metrics Function and Orbscan 11z corneal topographer.

  4. METHODS • Automated White to White (WTW) measurement was obtained from the Orbscan II. • Using the Eye metrics function the WTW was measured manually by two observers along the five point corneal reflections on the Orbscan real image. • The data was analysed using Statistica software for correlation ,reliability and Inter-rater repeatability.

  5. Orbscan WTW

  6. WTW WITH EYEMETRICS 5 point corneal reflections through which WTW is measured

  7. Results • 73 eyes of 37 patients were included in the study. • 25 females and 12 males. • Average duration of contact lens usage was 34 months (range 16-52 months). • All of them were using soft contact lenses

  8. Results

  9. Results Orbscan Obs A Obs B

  10. RESULTS • Manual measurements (Observer A&B) using eye metrics was statistically different compared to the automated measurements of Orbscan (p<0.001). • Standard deviation difference • Orbscan Vs OB-A is 0.19 • Orbscan Vs OB-B is 0.10

  11. Results Correlation R 0.0009(p>0.05). Slope -0.008 (P>0.05).Intercept -0.079 (P =0.05).

  12. Results Observer A – Observer B Average of measurements of Observer A & B Correlation R 0.0043(p>0.05). Slope -0.0336 (P>0.05).Intercept 0.468 (P =0.05).

  13. Results • Horizontal corneal diameter by manual Eye metrics measurements are longer than Orbscan derived measurements. • Manual measurement shows higher inter-rater variability and test – retest variability. • Variations tend to decrease with repeat measurements.

  14. Conclusion • Orbscan IIz corneal topographer underestimates the WTW especially in long term contact lens wearers. This error can be reduced by manual measurements using Eye metrics software. • Manual corneal measurement can be very useful in patients with pannus and other peripheral corneal changes. • This method will be very useful adjuvant to automated measurement of corneal diameter in selection of Phakic intraocular lenses ( ICLs) and ACIOLs.

  15. Thank you

More Related