1 / 13

Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board - Technical Committee. Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region. David Lewis Ph.D. Chief Economist. May 2, 2008. HDR|Decision Economics. 2. Comprehensive Value Assessment. Mobility

seanna
Download Presentation

Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board - Technical Committee Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region David Lewis Ph.D. Chief Economist May 2, 2008 HDR|Decision Economics

  2. 2 Comprehensive Value Assessment • Mobility • Congestion Management • Community Economic Development The economic benefits of transit:

  3. 3 Comprehensive Value Assessment • Time savings to transit users • Cash savings to low income households for reallocation to housing, nutrition, child care … • Cross-sector benefits: reduced financial burden on social services Mobility:

  4. 4 Comprehensive Value Assessment • Reduced delay • Improved reliability, predictability and productivity • Reduced environmental emissions • Lower vehicle operating costs • Safety (lives, injuries, property) Congestion Management:

  5. 5 Community Economic Development Location Efficiency Measurement Double Counting? • High density economic activity (retail, commercial …) • Agglomeration economies • Less demand for motorized trips • Reduced auto-ownership requirements, dependence • Higher density life-style • Development benefits manifest and measured as increased economic land value • Capitalization of time savings? Only partially

  6. 6 Emerging Evidence From Comprehensive Value Assessment (Cost-Benefit Analysis) • Projects can generate value in all three categories of transit value creation • Projects can be economically worthwhile (generate greater economic benefits than the life-cycle costs of construction, operations, maintenance and opportunity cost of capital) • Not all transit investments will generate more benefits than costs • Bus investments can outperform rail alternatives in terms of rate of return, but rail investment can generate greater absolute levels of economic benefit and net benefit • Transit investment can outperform highway alternatives in terms of economic return • Focusing on ridership-related benefits alone can lead to the mistaken conclusion that a project is not economically worthwhile

  7. 7 Comparing Alternative Alignments

  8. 8 Comparing Alternative Modes

  9. 9 A Streetcar Example

  10. 10 Risks With Partial Value Project Evaluation • Can understate prospective community value of transit projects • Design risk • Can overlook good transit projects • Inability to compare economic rate of return on alternative uses of funds • Can fail to identify all financing options

  11. 11 Potential Applications of Cost-Benefit Analysis in The Region • Corridor Cities Transitway, Phases I and II • Purple Line • Potomac Yards Metro Station • Columbia Pike Streetcar • New York Avenue Station • Anacostia Area Streetcar

  12. 12 Conclusions • Feasible in the case of transit projects • Can reveal economic value not otherwise apparent • Can reveal financing options not otherwise apparent • Can provide a basis for more widespread community support • Would be counter-productive as an added federal requirement Comprehensive Value Assessment:

More Related