Welcome to CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools

1. Welcome to CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools Coaching Call 5The session will begin shortly. To access the audio for the session, Dial: 800-977-8002, Participant code 083842#.The materials for this coaching call can be downloaded from the CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools password-protected web page. Directions for how to access this web page can be found on each of the coaching call meeting notices (appointments) sent to you. The phone lines will be open during the presentation. Please keep your phone on mute unless you are asking a question. If you do not have a mute function on your phone, you can press *6 to mute your phone (and *6 again to unmute if you want to ask a question). PLEASE DO NOT PUT YOUR PHONE ON HOLD!!! If you experience any problems, please call Marilyn Nichols at the MOCPS office at 573-636-1014, ext 221 or mnichols@mocps.org.

2. Document 1 CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools Coaching Call 5: Revisiting Evaluation Methods October 18, 2011 Pat Posa RN, BSN, MSA Kimberly O’Brien, MHA System Performance Improvement Leader Director, Program Development St. Joseph Mercy Health System Missouri Center for Patient Safety Ann Arbor, MI Jefferson City, MO patposa@comcast.netkobrien@mocps.org

3. Documents for this Session(All can downloaded from the CUSP Communication & Teamwork Tools password-protected web site. Detailed instructions are located on each of the coaching call meeting notices/appointments emailed to you by Kimberly O’Brien) • This PowerPoint presentation • Monthly Team Leader Checklist • Sample Agenda for October CUSP Team Meeting • Sample Structured Huddle Evaluation Tool • Case Summary Learning Tool • An audio file recording of this session will be emailed to you shortly after the call today

4. MDR with DG Action Plan

5. MDR with DG Evaluation: Outcome Metrics • Length of Stay • AHRQ HSOPS results • “In this unit, people treat each other with respect” • “Staff feel free to question the decision or actions of those with more authority” • “Staff are afraid to ask questions when something does not seem right”

6. MDR with DG Evaluation: Survey the Process Attending: Resident: RN: Intern: Circle others in attendance: Pharmacy Nutrition Respiratory Therapy CNL Room #: __________________ Rounding outside patient room: yes no Nursing notified: yes no n/a Nursing present during rounds: yes no RT present during rounds: yes no Checklist followed as outlined: yes no  (If no, what objectives were omitted) __________________________________________  Sepsis screen, sepsis bundles reviewed/signed by team: yes no Daily goals in room board updated by intern: yes no Plan of care/daily goals clarified with team: yes no  Nursing questions/concerns addressed: yes no n/a  Physician questions/concerns addressed: yes no n/a  Patient/family questions/concerns addressed: yes no n/a  Were team members listening to each other: yes no  Did leaders ask others for input: yes no  Feedback to team members (professionalism, team interaction, timeliness, efficiency, thoroughness, organization and clarity): __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Was criticism positively presented: yes no 6

7. MDR with DG EvaluationSurvey the Participants • 5 point scale • Was your voice/opinions heard and valued? • Did you have a understanding of what the goals and plan for the patient was for the day? • Did the leader facilitate the rounds to ensure efficiency and open communication? • What was the goal for day for each patient? • Did MDR with DG improve how you cared for your patient? • What worked? • What could be improved? 7

8. Structured Huddles Action Plan 8

9. Huddle Evaluation:Outcome/Process Metrics • Improvement in metrics on huddle board • AHRQ results: • “Our procedures and systems are good at preventing errors from happening” • “We are actively doing things to improve patient safety” • “After we make changes to improve patient safety, we evaluate their effectiveness” • “In this unit, we discuss ways to prevent errors from happening again”

10. Structured Huddles Evaluation:Survey the Staff • Select which department you work for: • I have attended a daily huddle - Once - 2-5 times - 5-10 times - 10-20 times - 20 or more times - I have not attended a huddle • I understand the purpose of the daily huddles - Strongly agree - Agree - N/A • Disagree • Strongly Disagree 4. I feel comfortable asking questions and expressing ideas during the huddles • Strongly Agree • Agree • N/A • Disagree • Strongly Disagree

11. Structured Huddles Evaluation:Survey the Staff 5. I feel that the daily huddle provides me with information to be able to provide safe, effective and efficient care to my patients • Strongly Agree • Agree • N/A • Disagree • Strongly Disagree 6. The huddle board has provided me the opportunity to see how my practice impacts patient outcomes • Strongly Agree • Agree • Disagree • Strongly Disagree 7. The huddle board and daily huddles empowers me to improve my own practice • Strongly Agree • Agree • Disagree • Strongly Disagree 8. Please provide any suggestions to improve both the huddle board and the huddle process

12. Round Robin • Which are you implementing? • Where are you at in action plan? • What are your next steps? • Are there any barriers that you are experiencing that are preventing you from moving forward? If so, what are they? 12

13. CUSP Communication & Teamwork ToolsNext Steps • Multidisciplinary Rounds • Complete action plan and pilot • Complete evaluation method(s) and implement (following pilot) • Gather data from evaluation • Structured Huddles • Complete action plan and finalize metrics • Do a pilot huddle on one shift, one day • Develop and complete evaluation method(s) and implement (following pilot) • Gather data from evaluation • Learning from a Defect • Continue working through LFD steps • Case Summary Learning Tool due to MOCPS by November 30, 2011 • CUSP Team Agenda • Continue taking chosen defect through the Learning from a Defect Tool • Complete MDR with DG pilot; Develop and implement evaluation metrics • Complete Structured Huddles metrics; Complete pilot; Develop and implement evaluation metrics • Gather data from evaluation(s) 13

14. Questions?