1 / 21

Multiple Comparison Procedures

Multiple Comparison Procedures. Comfort Ratings of 13 Fabric Types

selah
Download Presentation

Multiple Comparison Procedures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Multiple Comparison Procedures Comfort Ratings of 13 Fabric Types A.V. Cardello, C. Winterhalter, and H.G. Schultz (2003). "Predicting the Handle and Comfort of Military Clothing Fabrics from Sensory and Instrumental Data: Development and Application of New Psychophysical Methods," Textile Research Journal, Vol. 73, pp. 221-237.

  2. Treatments Means and standard deviations of 45 comfort ratings for 13 military fabrics. Fabric types: 10R - 50/50 Nylon/combed cotton, ripstop poplin weave 11A - 50/50 Nylon/Polyester, oxford weave (Australian) 12T - 50/50 Nylon/cotton, twill weave 13P - 92/5/3 Nomex/Kevlar/P140, plain weave 14N - 100 Cotton (former flame retardant treated) 15B - 77/23 Cotton sheath/synthetic core, twill (UK) 16C - 100 combed cotton, ripstop poplin (former hot weather BDU) 17C - 65/35 Wool/Polyester, plain weave (Canada-unlaundered) 18L - 65/35 Wool/Polyester, plain weave (Canada-laundered) 19N - 92/5/3 Nomex/Kevlar/P140, oxford weave 20J - Carded cotton sheath/nylon core, plain weave (Canada) 124 - 100 Pima cotton ripstop poplin (experimental) 176 - 50/50 Nylon carded cotton ripstop poplin weave

  3. Multiple Comparisons • Individual & Combined Null Hypotheses (H0  H01… H0k) • Comparisonwise Error Rate  Pr(Reject H0i|H0i True) • Experimentwise Error Rate  Pr(Reject any H0i|All H0i True) • False Discovery Rate  E(# False Rejects/Total Rejections) • Strong Familywise Error Rate  Pr(Any False Discoveries) • Simultaneous Confidence Intervals  Pr(All Correct)=1-e • Multiple Comparison Procedures control Type 1 Error Rate other than per comparison

  4. Data and Analysis of Variance

  5. Bonferroni Based Methods • Construct P-values for all k test statistics • Order P-values from smallest p(1) ≤ … ≤ p(k) • Bonferroni: Reject H0(i) if p(i) ≤ e/k • Holm (Controls Strong FWER): Reject H0(i) if p(j) ≤ e/(k-j+1)  j ≤ i • False Discovery Rate: Reject H0(i) if p(j) ≤ je/k for some j ≥ i (Assumes independent tests, not the case for this example) • Example: Comparing all k=13(12)/2=78 pairs of fabrics

  6. Fabric Example j=1,…,26

  7. Fabric Example j=27,…,52

  8. Fabric Example j=53,…,78

  9. Scheffe’s Method for All Contrasts • Can be used for any number of contrasts, even those suggested by data. Conservative (Wide CI’s, Low Power)

  10. Example – Scheffe’s Method – All Pairwise Tests/CIs

  11. Tukey’s Method for All Pairwise Comparisons • Makes use of the Studentized Range Distribution • Pr{(max(Y1,…,Yn)-min(Y1,…,Yn))/S ≥ q(a,n,n)} = a • {Y1,…,Yn }  S n  degrees of freedom for S

  12. Tukey’s Method for All Pairwise Comparisons

  13. Bonferroni’s Method for All Pairwise Comparisons • Adjusts type I error rate for each test to e/(# of tests) • Increases Confidence levels of CI’s to (1-(e/(# of CIs)))

  14. Bonferroni’s Method for All Pairwise Comparisons

  15. SNK Method for All Pairwise Comparisons • Controls False Discovery Rate at e • Uses Different Critical Values for different ranges of means

  16. SNK Method for All Pairwise Comparisons

  17. SNK Method for All Pairwise Comparisons

  18. Fisher’s Protected LSD for All Pairwise Comparisons • Controls Experimentwise Error Rate at e • Only Conducted if F-test is significant (P-value ≤ e)

  19. Fisher’s Protected LSD for All Pairwise Comparisons

  20. Multiple Comparisons with Best Treatment/Control • Pr{subset of treatments contains the best} = 1- e

  21. Multiple Comparisons with Best Treatment/Control Treatments 13P, 15B, and 11A all lie within 16.22 of the highest mean

More Related