1 / 31

2. Electrostatics

2. Electrostatics. 2A. Method of Images. Vanishing Potential from Two Point Charges. Consider two charges q and q' of opposite sign Lets assume without loss of generality that | q|  | q' | To simplify, put q at origin and q' on the z –axis at a distance d Potential is given by:

sfenner
Download Presentation

2. Electrostatics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2. Electrostatics 2A. Method of Images Vanishing Potential from Two Point Charges • Consider two charges q and q' of opposite sign • Lets assume without loss of generality that |q| |q'| • To simplify, put q at origin and q' on the z –axis at a distance d • Potential isgiven by: • Where is thepotential zero? q' d q

  2. Case 1: Planes • Suppose the two charges are equal andopposite, then the potential vanishes at • This is a plane that is equidistant between the two points How is this useful? • Suppose we have a plane with Dirichletboundaryconditions  = 0 on the plane • If you pretend there is an “image charge” – q on the other sideof the Dirichlet boundary, the two charges will produce a potentialthat cancels on the boundary • It will also satisfy 2 = –/0 in the allowed region –q d q

  3. Sample Problem 2.1 (1) An infinite line of charge with linear charge density  is at z = h, x = 0 above a plane conductor at z = 0. Find the electric field everywhere for z > 0, and the surface charge. • The conductor is at constant potential • Since it extends forever, assume it has  = 0 • Add an opposite charge line charge on the other side of the conductor • This guarantees that  = 0 on the conductor • Electric field from the original line charge •  is a vector pointing from the linecharge directly to the point of interest • So the electric field from the original line is • The image line charge causes an electric field • So the total field is:

  4. Sample Problem 2.1 (2) An infinite line of charge with linear charge density  is at z = h, x = 0 above a plane conductor at z = 0. Find the electric field everywhere for z > 0, and the surface charge. • To find the surface charge on the conductor, first find the electric field there • Note that it is perpendicular to the surface there, as it must be • Related to surface density by • Can show that, in this case, integrated surface charge cancels the original line

  5. Case 2: Spheres • Suppose |q| > |q'|then the potentialvanishes when • Complete the square • This is a sphere of radius: • Distance from q to center: • Distance from q' to center: a r' q' r d q

  6. Conducting Spheres a • Let’s put these formulastogether in a useful way: How is this useful? • Suppose we had a grounded ( = 0) conducting sphere of radius a • Plus a point charge q at distance r > a • Pretend there is an imagecharge q' at distance r', where • This will exactly cancel the potential fromthe charge q on the surface of the sphere • And it will satisfy 2 = 0 outside the sphere • So we have solved the problem! r' q' r q

  7. Sample Problem 2.2a A conducting sphere of radius a with potential  = 0 at the origin has a charge q on the z-axis at z = 2a. Find the potential (outside), and the total charge on the sphere. q • Add an image chargeof magnitude • It will be at • The potential is then To get the charge: • The hard way: • Find the electric field from the potential • Get the surface charge everywhere and integrate • The easy way: • Use Gauss’s Law on a surface surrounding the sphere • Electric field looks like point charge –q/2 • So charge on sphere must be –q/2 2a – q/2 a/2 a

  8. Sample Problem 2.2b A neutral conducting sphere of radius aat the origin has a charge q on the z-axis at z = 2a. Find the potential. q • First guess: We can do this exactly the same way as Problem 2.2a • This is wrong because the sphere had charge – q/2 • So far we have  = 0 on the sphere • To cancel this charge, add additional charge + q/2 on the sphere • It will distribute itself uniformly over the surface • This creates additional potential that looks like a point chargeof magnitude + q/2 at the center • Total potential (outside) is sum of these three contributions 2a – q/2 a/2 a q/2

  9. Hollow Spheres • We can use the same formulas for spherical cavity in a conductor • Place an image charge at r' of magnitude q' • Combination will cause vanishing potentialon the interior surface • You don’t have to worry about whethersurrounding conductor is neutral, since excesscharge flows away from interior surface • If you want to make   0 on interior surface,just add a constant to it • It is irrelevant anyway. q q'

  10. Green’s Functions for Planes and Spheres • Since we know how to get the potential for a point charge near a conducting plane or sphere we can find the Green’s functions for them • Green’s functions (with Dirichlet boundary conditions) satisfy • For a plane at z = 0 for the region z > 0,one source at x, one at xR = (x, y,–z) • For a sphere at origin with radius a, one point at x of size 1, one point at xR = a2x/x2 with magnitude –a/|x| • With some workcan rewrite this as • This formula also works for interior of a sphere as well

  11. Using Green’s Functions for Spheres (1) • Probably easiestto use inspherical coordinates •  is anglebetween x and x' • We can then use this formula for Dirichlet problems with spherical boundary • The normal derivative is: • On thesurfacer' = athis becomes

  12. Using Green’s Functions for Spheres (1) • Finally, the surface integral will take the form: • So we have

  13. Sample Problem 2.3 (1) The potential on the surface of a sphere of radius a centered at the origin is given by  = Ez. Find the potential outside the sphere. x z • We use ourformula forthe potential,ignoring the  term • For purposes of this integral, treat x as if it were the z-axis • This makes  = ' • With this choice of z-axis, what we normally call z-direction becomes •  is angle between x and ordinary z-axis • We are on the surfaceof the sphere, so • So we have: • Set up the integrals

  14. Sample Problem 2.3 (2) The potential on the surface of a sphere of radius a centered at the origin is given by  = Ez. Find the potential outside the sphere. x z • Do the ' integral • Let

  15. Sample Problem 2.4 A neutral conducting sphere of radius a is placed in a background electric field given by . Find the potential everywhere outside the sphere. • Recall: • This suggests • But this can’t be right because it is not constant at r = a • Let’s try to find a solution of the form: • Since there’s no charge outside, we must have • We need to cancel the potential from the first term, so • We already solved this problem: • So the answer is:

  16. 2B. Orthogonal Functions and Expansions General Theory of Orthogonal Functions • Let Un(x) be a set of functions in some region in d dimensions • d may be less than 3, even if the problem is 3-dimensional! • If we have enough functions Un(x), we can often approxi-mate any function as linear combinations of these functions • Often, finite sum is a good approximation for the infinite • It is useful to normally arrange the Un’s to be orthogonal • This can always be arranged • See quantum notes for details • Assuming the integral is finite when m = n, you cannormalize them to make them orthonormal • Given f(x), it is not hard to find the coefficients an:

  17. Completeness Relation, and Other Comments • Substitute the expressionon the right into the left • Since this is true for any function f(x),we must have the completeness relation • I’m not sure what  means, because I’m not sure how many dimensions we’re in Sometimes, we might not want all possible functions • We might want functions that vanishat certain locations, so we’d choose • Completeness still works in interior • We might want functions that havevanishing Laplacian, so we’d choose • This will ruin completeness

  18. 1D Discrete Fourier Transforms • Consider functions on the region (0, a) with periodic boundary conditions, f(0) = f(a) • It is well known that a complete set of functionsthat satisfy this equation are the Fourier modes: • n =0, 1, 2, 3,  • These are not quite orthonormal • Any function can be written in terms of them: • Coefficients are • Sometimes, it is easier to work with real functions • n = 0, 1, 2, 3,  • Then we can write anyfunction in terms of them: • Coefficients are:

  19. 1D With Vanishing Boundaries • If we instead demand that f(0) = 0 = f(a), we should use some different functions • Use real functions, but want them to vanish at these points: • n = 1, 2, 3,  • Not quite orthonormal • We can write an arbitrary function in the form: • The coefficients are given by

  20. 2D With Vanishing Boundaries • Suppose we have a 2D problem with f(x,y) where 0 < x < a and 0 < y < b • Let’s suppose we want f to vanish on all four boundaries • Since f vanishes at x = 0 and x = a, we must be able to write • Since f vanishes at y = 0 and y = b, the same must be true of An • Therefore, An must be writable in the form • We therefore have • Coefficients are: b a

  21. Continuous Bases • It is sometimes the case that you need to use a basis where n takes on continuous values • We might write the basis functions as U(x) • Then all sums become integrals • The relations above get changed to:

  22. Continuous Fourier Transforms • Theorem from quantum: • Consider the set of functions: • They are orthonormal: • Also complete • So we can write arbitraryfunctions in terms of these • Amplitude is given by • Can find similar formulas in 3D:

  23. Decomposition in Different Coordinates Consider the Laplacian in 3D in different coordinate systems: • Cartesian: • Cylindrical: • Spherical: • Often good to solve problem explicitly by writing function as a complete function in some of these variables, and unknown function in others

  24. 2C. Solving Problems in Cartesian Coordinates The Method • Suppose, for example, you have a boxwith potential zero on some surfaces • And let’s say it’sspecified on others • Write the potential in terms of complete functions on x and y • If there is no charge inside, then

  25. Modes That Satisfy Laplace’s Equation • Substitute thisinto Laplace’sequation: • Since these wave functions areindependent, we must have • Define • Then we have • The general solution of this equation is

  26. Matching the Boundary Equations • We haven’t matched the boundary conditions • On the top and bottom, we can also write the (known) potential as • We can get thecoefficients • To get it to match at z = 0, we must have • To get it to match at z = c, we must have • Two equations in two unknowns • Solve for nmand nm and we have 

  27. Sample Problem 2.5 (1) A cube of size a has potential 0 on five faces and potential  = xy on the last face. What is the potential everywhere, and at the center? • We have • We need it to vanish on z = 0, so nm = –nm • To match on z = a,we have • Find thecoefficients

  28. Sample Problem 2.5 (2) A cube of size a has potential 0 on five faces and potential  = xy on the last face. What is the potential everywhere, and at the center? • Now just substitute in the center

  29. 2D. Solving Probs. in Cylindrical Coordinates Potential in a Sharp Corner • Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates • Let’s do a 2D problem • Everything independent of z • Consider a sharp conducting angle of size  with vanishing potential • Presumably other sources/potentials somewhere else • The potential must vanish at  = 0 and  =  • We therefore canwrite the potential as • Substitute into • To make this vanish, we must have 

  30. Solving the Radial Equation • Second order differential equation shouldhave two linearly independent solutions • Guess solutions of the form • We therefore have • We therefore have • The general solution is • If we want finite potential near  = 0, must choose Bn = 0 • Therefore: • Largest contribution from n = 1:

  31. Electric Field near a Sharp Corner • The electric field is the derivative of the potential • This expression diverges at small  if >  • The sharper the corner, the faster it diverges • In 3D, electric fields maximum at pointy places • Lightning rods have large fields, cause charge to flow from atmosphere • Drains away charge buildup in vicinity of the rod 

More Related