1 / 12

IEEE 802.20 Session # 3 Closing Plenary

IEEE 802.20-03/13r1. IEEE 802.20 Session # 3 Closing Plenary. Mark Klerer, Jerry Upton Vice-Chairs 24 July 2004. Motions on the Progression of Technical Work in Singapore. Revisit Motion from Alan Chickinsky Motion from Bob Love

shalom
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.20 Session # 3 Closing Plenary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.20-03/13r1 IEEE 802.20 Session # 3 Closing Plenary Mark Klerer, Jerry Upton Vice-Chairs 24 July 2004

  2. Motions on the Progression of Technical Work in Singapore • Revisit Motion from Alan Chickinsky • Motion from Bob Love • Preauthorize the IEEE 802.20 attendees at the interim meeting in Singapore to progress the technical work of the Evaluation Criteria, Traffic and Channel Modeling, Coexistence, and Requirements correspondence groups provided that at least 50 voting members of IEEE 802.20 attend that meeting. At least 75% of voting members voting YES or NO must agree to all decisions. The total number of YES and NO votes must be at least 25. This preauthorization includes the progression of the Requirements document, including, but not limited to authorizing that it be sent out for a 21 day WG ballot For: 41 Against: 48 -> Motion Fails

  3. Submission of Correspondence Group Proposals • Document your proposal: • Proposal for new text: • Text proposal • Rationale • Proposal for deletion of text • Rationale for why it is not needed • Proposal for replacement text: • Problem with current text • Replacement text • Rationale for replacement text

  4. Processing of E-mail “contributions” • Open up selected issues/topics for review and discussion. • Comments in response to proposals are to be made within five business days. • After 5 business days the chair/editor may make a “consensus” proposal and include the text in the draft. (Identifying it as a consensus proposal) • Exception may be taken to that proposal. • Minimum time interval between successive editorial drafts will be 5 business days (All changes between successive editions are to be done with tracked changes) • When stable consensus has been reached that section of the document will be frozen for that round. • Meltdown may occur if technical problems are found. • The final draft to be discussed at an upcoming meeting must be available 5 business days before that meeting

  5. Coexistence e-mail Correspondence Group • Charter of the coexistence correspondence group: • Study and create a consensus recommendation on how to address issues related to the coexistence of future 802.20 systems with other wireless technologies deployed in the licensed bands below 3.5GHz. • The group should start with the existing contributions on the subject. • Expected first report to the working group is in November 03. • stds-80220-coexistence@ieee.org please wait to subscribe until link is available on web page (estimated date: 7-28-2003)

  6. Coexistence CG - Logistics • E-mail reflector:stds-80220-coexistence@ieee.org please wait to subscribe until link is available on web page (estimated date: 7-28-2003) • Conference Call Schedule • August 15 Friday 1:00-2:00 PM EDT • September 8 Monday 1:00-2:00 PM EDT

  7. Traffic Modeling Agenda • Freeze scope, list of traffic types, and usage scenarios • Proposal on email after mtg, 2 week comment period, Aug 8 deadline • Consensus on general approach • Uplink issues, average loading etc • Major thoughts by Aug 8 • Consensus on one traffic type after other • Web, VoIP, FTP …

  8. Traffic Models calls • Email is main medium, calls are only to provide some interaction • Will help you if you think interaction is useful to get a point across • Minutes/output will be on email • Aug 7 Thur 12pm-1:30pm EDT (GMT-4) • Aug 27 Wed 12pm-1:30pm EDT (GMT-4) • Can move time of 2nd call to share pain

  9. Channel Modeling Agenda • Relationship between MIMO and SIMO/MISO/SISO models. • Inclusion of outdoor-to-indoor channels in the model set. • Calls • August 5, 2003 2:00-3:00 PM EDT

  10. Evaluation Criteria CG • Issues: • Cell Layout (2 options) • Performance metrics • Fairness Criteria • Calls • Wed Aug 6 12:00-2 pm EDT • Wed Sep 3 12:00 am 2 pm EDT • Input requested: • Backhaul network model • Equipment characteristics • e,. Antenna height • transmit power

  11. Miscellaneous • Operating Procedures to be circulated for comment. Approval to be sought at the November plenary.

  12. Composite Conference Call Calendar(Post-meeting Slide) • August 2003 • Aug 5, Tuesday 2:00-3:00 PM Channel Modeling • Aug 6, Wednesday 12:00-2 PM Evaluation Criteria • Aug 7, Thursday 12-1:30 PM Traffic Modeling • Aug 15, Friday 1:00-2:00 PM Coexistence • Aug 27, Wednesday 12-1:30 PM Traffic Modeling • Sep 3, Wednesday 12:00 am 2 PM Evaluation Criteria • Sep 8, Monday 1:00-2:00 PM Coexistence • All times are EDT. Conference calls may be cancelled if they are not needed. Calls cannot be rescheduled as at least 30 day advance notice would be required. • Call-in information and call agenda to be available 5 business days prior to the call

More Related