1 / 17

Using CORE NDICATORS in Federal HCBS Reviews Jon Fortune, Ed.D David Heath, MPA

Using CORE NDICATORS in Federal HCBS Reviews Jon Fortune, Ed.D David Heath, MPA. Wyoming Developmental Disabilities Division & the Wyoming INstitute for Disabilities (WIND-UCE). HCBS Quality Framework Protocol Red - Indicates that information gathered by Core Indicators

shaw
Download Presentation

Using CORE NDICATORS in Federal HCBS Reviews Jon Fortune, Ed.D David Heath, MPA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using CORE NDICATORSin Federal HCBS Reviews Jon Fortune, Ed.DDavid Heath, MPA Wyoming Developmental Disabilities Division & the Wyoming INstitute for Disabilities (WIND-UCE)

  2. HCBS Quality Framework ProtocolRed -Indicates that information gathered by Core Indicators provides data that can be reviewed by CMS Domain Sub-Domain I. Participant Access A. Information/referral B. Enrollment II. Participant-centered A. Participant-centered service planningService planning and B. Service Delivery Delivery III. Provider Capabilities A. Provider Networks & Availability B. Provider QualificationsC. Ongoing Monitoring

  3. HCBS Protocol (cont.)Domain Sub-DomainIV. Participant safeguards A. Abuse, neglect, exploitation B. Major & unusual IncidentsC. Housing & environment D. Behavior interventions E. Medication management F. Personal safety & security G. Natural disastersV. Participant rights & A. GrievancesResponsibilities B. Due processC. Fundamental Rights

  4. HCBS Protocol (cont.) • Domain Sub-Domain • VI. Participant outcomes & A. Participant satisfaction Satisfaction B. Participant outcomes • System performanceA. System performance appraisal B. Continuous quality improvement C. Cultural competency D. Participant & stakeholder involvement E. Financial integrity

  5. Several other features in addition to 150 core indicators helped: • Use CARF…The Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission’s national standards for 3 waivers • Individual waiver budget technology (DOORS) with good system architecture * Extensive rules/training • RN, CDDN consultation • Published service provider site survey reports http://ddd.state.wy.us

  6. ‘02 & ‘03 Results – Wyoming (Consumer Survey) Wyoming’s performance was strong along four principal scales – community inclusion, support-related choices, personal choices, and service coordination

  7. Satisfaction with Work/Day Program (Consumer Survey) 2001 2002 89.1% (n=264) -YES - 94.2% (n=260) 5.7% (n=17) -In between- 4.3% (n=12) 5.0% (n=15) -NO- 1.4% (n=4)

  8. Satisfaction with Residential(Consumer Survey) 2001 2002 89.4% (n=288) -YES- 89.7% (n=272) 3.4% (n=11) -In Between- 5.6% (n=17) 7.1% (n=23) -NO- 4.6% (n=14)

  9. Case Management - 2002 (Individually-Selected Service Coordination)(Consumer Survey) • 94.7% know their case manager • 93% say their case manager helps them get things that they need if they ask • 89.6% say that their case manager asks them what they want

  10. Case Management (Family Surveys) 80.9% (combined total) Satisfied With Services Provided by Case Manager 71.3% Adult/Family 89.1% Child/Family 78.2% Family/Guardian (Thanks Washington State and Lisa Weber!!!)

  11. General Information • 91.6% (n=372) get the services that they need (66% of those answering were consumers) • 3.1% of agency boards are consumers • 19.8% of boards are family members • Community Inclusion is high (often @ 90%) • Choice and decision making was high (most had input)

  12. Range of annual per person expenditure by living arrangement (2002)

  13. Mortality, Serious Injury and Abuse/Neglect (2002) CMS reviewers liked: • NCI definitions of abuse/neglect (and that information was broken down in respect to restraints, injuries, and “substantiation”) • NCI breakdown of mortality (by age and total number in each population bracket) • NCI breakdown and definition of crimes (forcible rape, aggravated assault, larceny theft)

  14. Turnover rate: 50% HELP WANTED Direct service staff members $5.66 Need $10.23 (Core Indicator: staff pay and turnover) Funded July 1, 2002 Wyoming Legislature

  15. Contact Information http://www.hsri.org/cip/core.html National Core Indicators Web Site Jon Fortune, Ed.D jfortu@state.wy.us 307-777-7115 David Heath, MPA daheath@uwyo.edu 307-766-2609 DDD Wyoming Web Site http://ddd.state.wy.us http://wind.uwyo.edu/wycip/ Wyoming Core Indicators Web Site

More Related