1 / 26

Evolution of U.S. IR and Unions: Preface

Evolution of U.S. IR and Unions: Preface. The facts do not tell their own story; they must be cross-examined. They must be carefully analyzed, systematized, compared, and interpreted. -- Talcott Parsons. O si sesbili, si ergo, Fortibuses in ero, Nobili, demis trux, Sewatis enim, cowsendux.

shira
Download Presentation

Evolution of U.S. IR and Unions: Preface

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution of U.S. IR and Unions: Preface The facts do not tell their own story; they must be cross-examined. They must be carefully analyzed, systematized, compared, and interpreted. -- Talcott Parsons O si sesbili, si ergo, Fortibuses in ero, Nobili, demis trux, Sewatis enim, cowsendux.

  2. O si sesbili, si ergo, Fortibuses in ero, Nobili, demis trux, Sewatis enim, cowsendux. Oh see, see Billy, see ‘er go? Forty buses in a row! No, Billy, dem is trucks, See what’s in ‘em? Cows and ducks The facts (and text) must be cross-examined ...

  3. Themes in U.S. IR Evolution • Recurring impact of business cycles • Growing impact of industrialization • Ebb and flow of “radical” influence • Gradual emergence of a “mainstream” labor movement • Steady increase in government regulation • Shifting emphasis from property rights to human rights (not always steady)

  4. Colonial Times and Early Industrialization, circa 1700s-1860s (Punctuating History) • Organizations among skilled crafts, initially formed to face threat of “inferior goods” • Interests of employees (EEs) and employers (ERs) part as markets extend (expand) to larger areas; competition intensifies • “Union-like” movements come and go with the business cycle (pro-cyclical growth) • Government and courts clearly on the side of ERs • Still mainly a pre-industrial, agrarian society -- only 1/6 of workers employed outside agriculture in early 1800s

  5. Industrialization in Full Steam, c. 1860s-1910s • Civil War accelerates industrialization process; half work outside agriculture by 1865, 5/6 by end of World War I • Three relatively permanent labor orgs • Knights of Labor (KOL), 1869-90s* • American Federation of Labor (AFL), 1881-1955* • Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), 1905--20s* • Other labor orgs, incl. friendly societies, utopian movements, farm-labor alliances, appear briefly

  6. The Knights of Labor • Secret society origins • Reform-orientated (no drunks, gamblers, or lawyers) • Educating for a better world; “don’t strike, write essays” -- leaders • Favored and set up “producer cooperatives” • Wanted to abolish wage system through reform, not revolution • Membership surged after successful strikes against Jay Gould’s RRs • Noteworthy structure: Craft, industrial, and mixed “assemblies” (locals) • Demise by 1890s for various reasons • Insensitive leaders, not in touch with desperate conditions • Lost second strike against Gould RRs • Association with Haymarket Riot and other “radicalism” • Competition from AFL unions

  7. American Federation of Labor • Origins in FOTLU (formed in 1881; AFL in 1886) • Principles (pure and simple unionism, business unionism, B&B unionism) • Advance worker interests within existing wage system (capitalism) • Craft unionism(occupational or skill-based) -- basic structural principle • Craft autonomy and exclusive jurisdiction • Advocated strike use as an economic weapon • Relatively apolitical (“what government gives it can take away”) • Leadership: Samuel Gompers (led 1881-1924) • Late 1800s, early 1900s: unspectacular but steady growth • Why didn’t the AFL evolve toward industrial unionism? • Some key events: Homestead, Pullman, 1919 steel strike

  8. Pullman and Paternalism • Outside Chicago, late 1800s, set up by George Pullman • Pullman was the epitome of a “company town.” Workers toiled in Pullman’s shops, lived in his houses, prayed in his churches, sent children to his schools, shopped in his stores, were buried in Pullman cemeteries (and some suggested, went to the Pullman hell). • Pullman called it a “new departure and a new idea” • Labor leaders called it a “slave pen without equal.” • Wage cuts and layoffs in 1894, with no cuts in prices for company goods and services. Grievance committee was fired; workers struck • Eugene V. Debs, President of the American Railway Union (ARU), an industrial union for RR workers, called a sympathy strike • Injunctions and federal troops combine to crush the strike • Aftermath and lessons from the Pullman Strike

  9. At the Turn of the Century -- Signs of the Times & Reasons for Radicalism • Government, especially courts, clearly biased • “Law must stand at all times [for] capital” (NY Sup Ct, 1919) • Double standard for business vs. workers in pursuit of self-interest • Injunctive powers often abused (“Era of the Injunction”) • ER attitudes often harsh and arrogant • Baer: “The interests of workers are to be looked after not by the labor agitators, but by the Christian men to whom God in his infinite wisdom has given control of the property interests of this country.” (c. 1902) • Absentee ownership a new problem • After touring his struck factories Mr. Shafner (Hart, Shafner, and Marx) said “Then I wasn’t surprised they were on strike … I was only surprised they had waited so long” (c. 1910) • Triangle Shirtwaist Co. Fire-- 150 women workers die behind locked doors (c. 1911)

  10. Industrial Workers of the World, IWW, a/k/a “The Wobblies” • Origins in miners and socialists, formed in 1905 • Various interpretations • IWW= IWon’t Work (employers) / IWill Win (members) • “Wobbly” term from Chinese immigrant members’ pronunciation of “IWW” or vacillation on policy between revolutionary unionism versus pure and simple unionism for all workers, or “other”? • Early principles • Workers and capitalists have no common interests • “One Big Union” for all workers (but later spelled out industrial divisions) • Abolish wage system, with force if needed • Refuse to sign contracts with employers • Opposed US involvement in WW I • Endorsed “direct action” tactics (including sit-down strike, sabotage) • IWW raises a key issue on union roles: job-conscious unionism vs. revolutionary unionism (Perlman vs. Marx)

  11. The IWW “Character”:Impractical Romantics, or Hoboes & Bums? • “Self-portraits” • Song: “Hallelujah I’m a Bum!” • Images: Drowned cat, organizer, champion of the underdog • Organizer Elizabeth Gurley Flynn -- real-world inspiration for popular Broadway musical, “The Rebel Girl” • Known for songs, posters, etc. Apparently the IWW drew a creative, poetic, melodious, and artistic following. Joe Hill (organizer) was most famous of their songwriters • Hanged in Utah for murder,viewed as martyr to cause by IWW • Joan Baez performed the song “Joe Hill” at Woodstock (1969): I dreamed I saw Joe Hill last night, alive as you and me … I never died, said he ... what they could never kill, went on to organize • Loved (for their idealism) and hated (for their radicalism) by many. Two sides of the same coin?

  12. IWW Issues & Demise (1917-20) • Why did the IWW fade away? • Reasons commonly cited for their demise • Failed to develop ideology appealing to most US workers (too radical); but succeeded in developing one that threatened powerful interests (employers, owners of capital, AFL unions, clergy, etc.) during the time of America’s first “Red Scare” • Impractical: Voluntary dues, refusing to sign CB contracts, neglect of union administration issues, tried to represent the least powerful and most oppressed in society • Alienated many with egalitarianism, religious heresy during free speech fights (shouting “there is no god”), opposition to war, etc. • Government and vigilante repression as illustrated in “The Great Roundup” and “Bisbee Deportation” and similar incidents

  13. World War I to World War II, c. 1910s-1920s • War-time developments and union roles • Legitimation via participation and support for war effort (AFL unions) • Post-WW I and the “Roaring 20s” • Post-war strikes, severe recession, and a “Red Scare” • General anti-union feelings -- business was providing (for many) • Employer “counteroffensives” to roll back union war-time gains: “Open” shop movement, Mohawk Valley Formula, and the American Plan • Railway Labor Act (1926) • Major provisions • Why RRs? (But note extension to airlines in 1934) • Interventionist philosophy notable • 1929 Crash

  14. World War I to World War II, cont’d, c. 1930s-1940s • Critical period • Legal framework established (NLRA, et al.) • Union philosophy and structure firmed up • The Great Depression -- how bad was it? • Unemployment rate at 25% or higher in 1933 • Single-earner households • Virtually no “safety net” at this time • Legislative developments • Secondary concerns: substantive legislation (e.g., min. wage) • Primary concerns: labor relations law • Norris-LaGuardia Act (1932) • National Industrial Recovery Act (1933-35) • Wagner or National Labor Relations Act (1935)

  15. Major Provisions of N-L and NIRA • Norris-LaGuardia or Federal Anti-Injunction Act (1932); Note noninterventionist nature • Declared CB to be favored national policy • Made “yellow dog” contracts unenforceable • Greatly restricted injunctions in labor disputes • National Industrial Recovery Act (1933-35) • Industry councils to develop codes of fair competition • Labor provisions called for representation elections; banned certain ER practices, set up NLB • Problem for labor section: No enforcement mechanism • Unconstitutional: “Blue Eagle” done in by “Sick Chicken”

  16. Key Parts of “Wagner Act,” or National Labor Relations Act (1935) • This is, as amended, still the “law of the land” with broad jurisdiction (“interstate commerce” w/ specific exclusions) • Policy statements: Industrial strife impedes interstate commerce; CB favored to resolve • Sec. 7 -- the “heart” of the act: Workers have the right to form, join, assist unions of their choice • Sec. 8 -- ULPs for employers: Bans certain practices such as discrimination against unionists, refusal to bargain • Specifies representation election procedures • Creates NLRB to decide ULP cases and conduct elections; also gives it the power to seek enforcement of its orders through fed. Courts

  17. Meanwhile, Back at the Union Hall ... “Labor’s Civil War” is Erupting • Unionization is low and falling in 1933: Something must be done! • Lewis (UMWA) and others argue the time is ripe for industrial unionism; form Committee on Industrial Organization (CIO) within the AFL • AFL craft hard-liners favor temporary “Federal Locals” • Confrontation at 1935 convention • Lewis and Hutcheson (Carpenters) fight • CIO ordered to dissolve, but instead the CIO’ers secede and form Congress of Industrial Organizations

  18. The Turbulent Years, 1933-45? • Following the CIO’s breakaway, both feds grew • Overall membership increased five-fold between 1933 and 1945 • AFL regained lead after initial CIO surge (partly via sit-downs), often persuading employers that an AFL union would be better than a more radical CIO union (CIO exploited communists as organizers) • Many of today’s major unions created by CIO organizing committees at this time (e.g., UAW, USWA), and many AFL craft unions became more diverse, “semi-industrial” or “general” unions (e.g., IBEW) • Wartime roles during WW II • Both federations supported war effort, pledged not to strike • Both participated in tripartite War Labor Board to settle disputes • Grievance arbitration gets a big boost as a strike alternative • Varied responses to “Rosy the Riveter” members and minorities

  19. Since World War II, c. 1945- • Post-war strike surge (1946) • Taft-Hartley or LMRA (1947) • McClellan hearings on union corruption and communist influence (1950s) • AFL-CIO merger (1955) • New unions: white collar and public sector • Landrum-Griffin or LMRDA (1959) • Other changes to labor law • Employer offensive in the 1980s

  20. Immediate Post-WW II Era, 1946-50 • Post-war strike surge: More than 1% of work time lost; 1946 still holds record for U.S. strike activity • Republicans regain Congressional control in ‘46 -- “New Deal” backlash (and 14 years of Democrat control)? • Taft-Hartley or Labor-Management Relations Act passed over Truman’s veto in 1947 • AFL and CIO continue to compete for members, but the pickings are slimmer • Cold War settles in; concerns about “Reds” return and CIO tries to expel its own Reds • Bargaining for new benefits and establishing patterns

  21. Taft-Hartley Act or Labor Management Relations Act (1947) • Amended NLRA of 1935 • Major provisions • Re-enacted NLRA policy statements, but added new ones stressing ER and individual EE rights (contrast to collective EE rights emphasis) • Amends Sec. 7 rights to include right to refrain • Sec. 8b specifies union ULPs (old Sec. 8 now becomes Sec. 8a) • Sec. 301: CB agreements enforceable in Fed. Ct. • Provisions for “National Emergency” disputes • ER “free speech” rights and other election changes • States allowed to pass “Right to Work” laws (banning “union shop”) • Also note that it says the amended law can be called the NLRA or LMRA

  22. Evolving Through the ‘50s • AFL-CIO Merger in 1955 • McClellan Hearings in Congress (late 50s) expose union corruption and undemocratic practices; link some unions with communists (during “Tailgunner Joe” Red Scare) • Landrum-Griffin or Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (1959) • Mostly addresses internal union affairs -- governance and corruption issues: financial disclosure, member rights to vote, have contract, etc. • Some changes to NLRA, incl. more union ULPs • Bargaining stabilizing, maturing; membership stabilizes, density (%)declines slightly • LR function is “top dog”; personnel keeps records

  23. Evolving Through the 60s-70s • Kennedy’s Exec. Order in 1962 • Public sector unions surge while private sector unions stagnate; Leaders (e.g., Meany) seem unconcerned • Nonlabor social issues take center stage (e.g., poverty, inequality, Viet Nam, drugs) • Globalization is beginning to take off, imports surge • Nonunion sector becoming more signif., innovative in HR • Labor relations law • Postal (1970) and health care sector (1974) amendments to NLRA • General NLRA reform effort fails due to filibuster in 1978 • Civil Service Reform Act passes in 1978 -- an NLRA for fed employees • Many states pass laws on S&L worker union rights, bargaining

  24. Evolution of Unions & IR in the 1980s • Great Recession (About 10% unemployed in 1981-82) • Reagan fires 12,000 striking PATCO members in 1981 -- an important symbol? • More conservatism, individualism • Employers • Elevate HR and demote LR • Take more aggressive stances toward bargaining and unionization attempts -- the era of union busting and concession bargaining? • Union density decline accelerates as unions’ memberships shrink in absolute numbers; strikes becoming more rare • Unions begin to face up to their decline and strategize about their future

  25. Some Relatively Unchanged Aspects of U.S. Unions and IR • Bargaining issues and tactics largely unchanged since 1940s, although strikes are much less frequent and often ineffective • Unions are a powerful but shrinking force • Great diversity in unions and members • Bargaining still the main emphasis, politics secondary • Union philosophy still mainly “business unionism” • Union image problems: Corruption, autocracy, strikes, inefficiency, etc. • Employers generally oppose unions, but learn to work with them when they must

  26. What’s New? Union and IR Evolution in the 1990s-2000s • “Downsizing” started in 80s, spreads in 90s • Temp or contingent work grows rapidly too • Globalization a key force, but not much international unionism or bargaining (yet?) • “Information Revolution” a growing force on all the parties; unions lag but are catching on quickly • HR pressured to show bottom line impacts; downsized in many companies; outsourcing HR? • Dunlop Commission studies reform, but its report arrives “DOA” • AFL-CIO coup by John Sweeney; vows to emphasize organizing (30% r.t. 3% of budgets) and to rebuild union political muscle, be more aggressive • A “great expansion” in the economy? • 9-11 and beyond? United We Stand?

More Related