1 / 56

Waikato Regional Transportation Model

Waikato Regional Transportation Model. Grant Smith & Julie Ballantyne. Items to cover. Objectives of WRTM. Items to cover. Objectives of WRTM Project Timetable. Items to cover. Objectives of WRTM Project Timetable Data Collected. Items to cover. Objectives of WRTM Project Timetable

Download Presentation

Waikato Regional Transportation Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Waikato Regional Transportation Model Grant Smith & Julie Ballantyne

  2. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM

  3. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable

  4. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected

  5. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected • Model Capabilities

  6. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected • Model Capabilities • Model Form

  7. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected • Model Capabilities • Model Form • Model Basic Statistics

  8. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected • Model Capabilities • Model Form • Model Basic Statistics • A Look at the Future

  9. Items to cover • Objectives of WRTM • Project Timetable • Data Collected • Model Capabilities • Model Form • Model Basic Statistics • A Look at the Future • Interesting Issues

  10. Objectives for the WRTM • A single transport model for the Waikato Region As opposed to • Two modelling platforms • Five different models

  11. Objectives for the WRTM • A single transport model for the Waikato Region As opposed to • Two modelling platforms • Five different models • Quality data and modeling: Currently • Previous Models used old or borrowed data • Asking more of existing models

  12. Objectives for the WRTM • A single transport model for the Waikato Region As opposed to • Two modelling platforms • Five different models • Quality data and modeling: Currently • Previous Models used old or borrowed data • Asking more of existing models • Minimise project and administration overhead: • Range of project managers and administrators

  13. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation

  14. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation Contract signed 19th October 2007

  15. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation Contract signed 19th October 2007 Initial Completion date April 2009

  16. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation Contract signed 19th October 2007 Initial Completion date April 2009 Delayed by Home Interview Survey

  17. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation Contract signed 19th October 2007 Initial Completion date April 2009 Delayed by Home Interview Survey Clean HIS data available March 2009

  18. Project Timetable Project = Model Build + Operation Contract signed 19th October 2007 Initial Completion date April 2009 Delayed by Home Interview Survey Clean HIS data available March 2009 Model build completed Jan 2010

  19. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys

  20. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Survey March 2008 to January 2009 • Face-to-face interviews conducted • 2,000 Households (1,000 in Hamilton) • Saturday Survey for additional 500 HHs • Trip rates: • Unexpanded = 9.4 daily person trips/HH • Expanded = 11.2 daily person trips/HH

  21. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Roadside Interview Surveys

  22. Data Collected • Roadside Interview Surveys • Survey December 2007 to March 2008 • 18 locations in total • Auckland & Tauranga data borrowed • All vehs, 1 direction, 12 hours • 6 Hamilton Sites ANPR

  23. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Roadside Interview Surveys • Bus Passenger Interview Surveys

  24. Data Collected • Bus Passenger Interview Surveys • Survey July 2008 to November 2008 • Survey 50% peak & 33% off-peak services • On-board interview survey • Interviewed 4,700 passengers • 30% sample (16k pax/day) • Expand to EW patronage data

  25. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Roadside Interview Surveys • Bus Passenger Interview Surveys • Census Data (JTW & Crosstabs)

  26. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Roadside Interview Surveys • Bus Passenger Interview Surveys • Census Data (JTW & Crosstabs) • Traffic Counts

  27. Data Collected • Household Interview Surveys • Roadside Interview Surveys • Bus Passenger Interview Surveys • Census Data (JTW & Crosstabs) • Traffic Counts • Journey Time Surveys

  28. Capabilities of the Models • Two models • Vehicle driver • Person

  29. Capabilities of the Models • Vehicle Driver • Includes light and heavy vehicles separately • Three periods • Morning Peak – 0700 to 0900 • Inter peak – 1100 to 1300 • Evening peak – 1600 to 1800

  30. Capabilities of the Models • Vehicle Driver Suitable for • Road network analysis • Network operation • Landuse planning • Inputs to economic analysis

  31. Capabilities of the Models Person model Outputs are trips by mode • Car Driver • Car Passenger • Bus Passenger • Walk and Cycle

  32. Capabilities of the Models Person model • Two Periods • Morning Peak – 0700 to 0900 • Inter Peak – 1100 to 1300

  33. Capabilities of the Models Person model Suitable for • Travel demand management analysis • Bus Passenger service design • Land use Planning

  34. Model Form Standard three and four step models

  35. Model Form Standard three and four step models Trip generation – 10x4 category model

  36. Model Form Standard three and four step models Trip generation – 10x4 category model Gravity Distribution - -ve exponential functions

  37. Model Form Standard three and four step models Trip generation – 10x4 category model Gravity Distribution - -ve exponential functions Logit mode split model

  38. Model Form Standard three and four step models Trip generation – 10x4 category model Gravity Distribution - -ve exponential functions Logit mode split model Assignment – full Intersection modelling

  39. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones

  40. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes

  41. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes 20,000 Links

  42. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes 20,000 Links 13 Trip Purposes

  43. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes 20,000 Links 13 Trip Purposes Three step takes 6 minutes per period

  44. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes 20,000 Links 13 Trip Purposes Three step takes 6 minutes per period Four step takes a little longer

  45. Some Basic Statistics 900 Zones 8400 Nodes 20,000 Links 13 Trip Purposes Three step takes 6 minutes per period Four step takes a little longer TRACKS software

  46. A look at the future Deficiency analysis at 2006 2021 2041

  47. 550 500 450 400 350 300 Kilometres of Road Affected by LOS Number of Intersections by LOS 250 200 150 100 50 -50 0 2006 2021 2041 2006 2021 2041 0.9 43.6 72.1 22 50 83 LOS F LOS F 30.2 56.5 109.6 23 19 35 LOS E LOS E 42.8 93.7 129.8 38 44 54 LOS D LOS D 107.5 171.8 210.7 210 223 287 LOS C LOS C Example Model Outputs

  48. Example Model Outputs

  49. Hamilton PM peak LOS 2006

  50. Hamilton PM peak LOS 2021

More Related