1 / 19

RGGR: Regional GHG Registry

RGGR: Regional GHG Registry. Joanne Morin, NH DES RGGI Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2004 Boston, MA. State Registry History and Rationale. New Hampshire: 1999 California: 2000 Wisconsin: 2000 Why? Risk management Demonstrate leadership on GHG emissions mitigation

Download Presentation

RGGR: Regional GHG Registry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RGGR:Regional GHG Registry Joanne Morin, NH DES RGGI Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2004 Boston, MA

  2. State Registry History and Rationale • New Hampshire: 1999 • California: 2000 • Wisconsin: 2000 • Why? • Risk management • Demonstrate leadership on GHG emissions mitigation • Inventory improvement

  3. That was then… Originally proposed as a voluntary registry This is now… Transitioned into a registry that supports three functions: • voluntary reporting • mandatory reporting • RGGI reporting • Support from Energy Foundation and Pew • NESCAUM facilitating, coordinating work with WRI and California Registry

  4. Goals POSSIBLE RGGR Tasks: Support RGGI • Track GHG emissions • Track allowances, credits, and trades • Provide quality data for expansion of the sectors • Oversee verification process Mandatory Reporting • Provide quality emissions data to states and to RGGI • for future expansion • Bottom-up state/regional inventory development • Potential future baseline protection for entities affected • Provide basis for government voluntary reduction • programs, like 33/50 and TRI • Provide stakeholders with relevant information Voluntary Reporting • Document credible, reproducible, and transparent base • year emissions, which might be protected in future • Provide technical support to first-time reporters • Identify emissions trends and track progress • Provide stakeholders with relevant information

  5. Conceptual Design for RGGR RGGI Regulatory RGGR Mandatory Reporting Voluntary

  6. A participant entering RGGR to report to RGGI RGGR … Outside of RGGR Region CT DE MA ME NH NY NJ VT Facility Facility Facility Facility Indirect Emissions Direct Emissions Fugitive Scope 2 emissions Scope 3 emissions Process Mobile Stationary Combustion RGGI entity (e.g. 25 MW electric generation unit) Must report if participating in RGGI Unit Unit Unit

  7. RGGR A participant entering RGGR to fulfill state mandatory reporting requirements … Outside of RGGR Region CT DE MA ME NH NY NJ VT Facility Facility Facility Facility Indirect Emissions Direct Emissions Fugitive Scope 2 emissions Scope 3 emissions Process Mobile Stationary Combustion RGGI entity (e.g. 25 MW electric generation unit) Unit Unit Unit Must report if participating in state mandatory reporting programs.

  8. A participant entering RGGR as a voluntary reporter RGGR … Outside of RGGR Region CT DE MA ME NH NY NJ VT Facility Facility Facility Facility … Indirect Emissions Direct Emissions Fugitive Scope 2 emissions Scope 3 emissions Process Mobile Stationary Combustion RGGI entity (e.g. 25 MW electric generation unit) Sample reporting requirements for voluntary reporters. Unit Unit Unit A participant might choose to report these elements as well.

  9. RGGR Design Elements • Define geographical and organizational boundaries [company (state, regional, national), facility, unit] • Define which gases covered (six Kyoto gases) • Define which direct sources covered (stationary, mobile, process, fugitive) • Define scope of emissions covered (direct, indirect – scope 2 and 3) • Define verification (self, state, 3rd party)

  10. Yet to be decided whether entity will be region-wide or state-wide. Also, whether outside-of-region data will be reported state-by-state or nation-wide. Entity-wide data with breakdown of data on facility and unit level (National could be optional) Voluntary Entity Mandatory Reporting Entity Facility and unit level data required *Thresholds for reporting to be determined for units under RGGI (most likely 25 MW) RGGI Entity Unit level data only Defining geographical and organizational boundaries [company (state, regional, national), facility, unit] *NEED TO ALSO DEFINE RULES ON CONSOLIDATION: Equity Share or Control Approach Equity Share Approach: A company accounts for GHG emissions from operations according to its share of equity in the operation. The equity share reflects economic interests, which is the extent of rights a company has to the risks and rewards flowing from an operation. Control Approach: A company accounts for 100 percent of the GHG emissions from operations over which it has control. It does not account for GHG emissions from operations in which it owns an interest but has no control. Control can be defined in either financial or operational terms.

  11. All six Kyoto gases required Defining Which Gases Covered Voluntary Reporting Each gas will have a de minimis value. Mandatory Reporting All six Kyoto gases required RGGI Reporting CO2 required during Phase I (other Kyoto gases may be added over time)

  12. Stationary required only during Phase I (Process, Mobile, and Fugitive may be added over time) RGGI Reporting Each source will have de minimis value. Defining Which Direct Sources Covered Voluntary Reporting Stationary, Process, Mobile, and Fugitive required Mandatory Reporting Stationary, Process, Mobile, and Fugitive required Stationary combustion: emissions from production of electricity, heat, or steam Process: emissions from physical or chemical processing Mobile: emissions from transportation of materials, products, waste, and employees Fugitive: emissions from intentional or unintentional releases, i.e. equipment leaks, methane emissions from coal mines, etc.

  13. Scope 1 and 2 Required Mandatory Reporting Scope 1 Required RGGI Reporting Scope 1 Required for Phase I (Scope 2 and 3 may be added over time) Defining Scope of Emissions Covered Scope 3 reporting could be strongly encouraged for certain sectors which have significant scope 3 emissions, such as the cement sector. Scope 1 and 2 Required (Scope 3 could be optional) Voluntary Reporting Although Scope 1 was the first priority of a mandatory program, a separate module for scope 2 reporting methodologies will be attached to the model rule/regulatory guidance document – a module which states can elect to adopt OR Choice of state Scope 1: Direct GHG Emissions (production of electricity, heat, or steam; physical or chemical processing; transportation of materials, products, waste, and employees; fugitive emissions) Scope 2: Indirect GHG Emissions from Imports and Consumption of Electricity, Heat, or Steam Scope 3: Other Indirect GHG Emissions (i.e. employee business travel; transportation of products, materials, and waste; outsourced activities; production of imported materials; etc.)

  14. Mandatory Reporting State Verification RGGI Reporting State Verification Defining Verification Voluntary Reporting Third Party Verification Offsets ?? Third Party Verification

  15. RGGR-RGGI Linkage • Among RGGI administrative needs -- a registry that has the capacity to perform accounting functions such as: • emissions tracking • allowance transfers • compliance checks • and other tasks (housing offsets)

  16. Data Flow between States (enforcement/compliance body)and RGGR: Factors to Keep in Mind • Overall Ease of Tracking Emissions, Allowances, and Offsets • Administrative Costs (Software, Staff, Transactions) • Political Feasibility • Ease of Reporting for Facilities • Ease of Reporting for States’ Purposes • Support of RGGI Phase 2 Expansion (Gases, Sectors) • Ease of Public Viewing/ Transparency • Potential for International Interface

  17. Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Facility Facility Facility RGGR RGGR State State State RGGR Data Flow Options

  18. Stakeholder Process • Draft Stakeholder Process Plan: • RGGR Website a Primary Communication Tool; • Informal Meetings/Outreach to Stakeholders; • Public Meetings, if necessary; and • Use RGGI Stakeholder Group Process as Appropriate. • Input into subgroups (software and reporting templates; calculation tools; verification; protocol, and project reporting), as appropriate

  19. Questions/Comments? • Visit www.rggr.us for more information • Contact information: Joanne Morin, NH DES [jmorin@des.state.nh.us] Suzanne Watson, Kelly Levin, NESCAUM [swatson@nescaum.org] [klevin@nescaum.org]

More Related