1 / 13

Plan Sweden

Plan Sweden. Urban children’s risk and agency. Olle Castell Disaster Risk Management Advisor. Plan International. Child Rights organization Active in 50 countries Program Units – traditionally dominantly rural 8 impact areas – Disaster Risk Management is one of them.

solana
Download Presentation

Plan Sweden

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plan Sweden Urban children’s risk and agency Olle Castell Disaster Risk Management Advisor

  2. Plan International • Child Rights organization • Active in 50 countries • Program Units – traditionally dominantly rural • 8 impact areas – Disaster Risk Management is one of them

  3. Child Centered Disaster Risk Reduction • Children are proportionally affected • Typically 50-60% of those affected by disasters • Death and illness, exploitation and abuse, failure to meet right to education, development and protection • Children as agents for change • Children are often portrayed as passive victims • When provided with accurate support and protection they have a great capacity to become agents of change • “take the most advantaged and put them in the centre of the process”

  4. Urban Risks • The world’s population is increasingly urban • Urban areas areincreasinglyrecognized as beingsusceptibleto the impactsod disasters and climatechange • A high proportion of urban residents arechildren

  5. Is Disaster Risk Management different in Urban areas? • Plans Toolkitslargleydeveloped and adjustedtorural contexts • Is there a needtodevelop different models for urban contexts?

  6. Scale of risk Resilience versus Disaster Risk Reduction

  7. Study on Urban Child Centered Disaster Risk Reduction • Plan International and IIED undertook a study on urban childrens risk and agency • Jakarta, Manila, Dhaka and Kathmandu • Focus Group Discussions and Interviews with street children, working children and children living in squatters and slums

  8. Who is at risk Urban children are generally better off than their rural counterparts. However, this is not true for hundred of millions of children live in urban poverty. Hazard xVulnerability Risk = Capacity • Who within an urban population is at risk? • Those who live and work in overcrowded informal settlements concentrated in hazard prone areas that lack basic protective infrastructure and service • Children, particularly girls, are disproportionally affected • Street children, working children and children living in squatters and slums

  9. Urban Slums • UN Habitat: five slum deprivations, lack of (one or more): • Access to improved water • Access to improved sanitation • Security of tenure • Durability of housing • Sufficient living area (< 4 people/room)

  10. City profiles

  11. Orfan scavengers in Manila • Parentless street children in Dhaka • Child labourers in Kathmandu

  12. Priority action for reducing urban children’s risks • Enhance access to quality housing and other buildings with appropriate basic infrastructure • Build capacity of families and communities to cope with shocks and stresses • Foster shared planning processes between children and adults • Target beneficiaries based on better understanding of the differentials in risk between high- and low-income children

  13. Particular aspects in Urban DRR programming Much is same as usual, byt somethingsdiffer: • Common goods – sewage system, pipedwater, public transports insteadofindividual HH solutions as pit latriesand wells • Morecomplex public administration • Closerto central ministries (if in capital) • Need for strong analysistoreach the mostvulnerable – can’ttarget all • Proliferationof NGOs • Dynamic population, migration • Livelihood different - workers – not farmers. Needtoaddressworksiteenvironment, factories…

More Related