1 / 15

process dynamics and control Seborg 4th edition chapter solution manual pdf

https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/<br>-------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Authors: Seborg, Edgar, Mellichamp, Doyle<br> Published: Wiley 2017<br> Edition: 4th<br> Pages: 572<br> Type: pdf<br> Size: 12.5MB

solutionnpp
Download Presentation

process dynamics and control Seborg 4th edition chapter solution manual pdf

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/

  2. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ Chapter 2 2.1 a) Overall mass balance: ρ ( ) d V = + − (1) w w w 1 2 3 dt Energy balance: d C    = − ρ ( V T T ) 3 ref − + − ( ) ( ) wC T T w C T T 1 1 2 2 ref ref (2) dt ( ) − − w C T T 3 3 ref V = Because ρ = constant and V = constant, Eq. 1 becomes: = + w w w (3) 3 1 2 b) From Eq. 2, substituting Eq. 3 ( ρ CV dt − ) d T T dT dt − 3 ref = = − + − 3 CV wC T T w C T T ρ ( ) ( ) 1 1 2 2 ref ref (4) ) ( ) ( + − w w C T T 1 2 3 ref Constants C and Tref can be cancelled: dT V ρ = + − + 3 ( ) w T w T w w T (5) 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 dt The simplified model now consists only of Eq. 5. Solution Manual for Process Dynamics and Control, 4th edition Copyright © 2016 by Dale E. Seborg, Thomas F. Edgar, Duncan A. Mellichamp, and Francis J. Doyle III 2-1

  3. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ Degrees of freedom for the simplified model: Parameters : ρ, V Variables : w1, w2, T1, T2, T3 NE = 1 NV = 5 Thus, NF = 5 – 1 = 4 Because w1, w2, T1 and T2 are determined by upstream units, we assume they are known functions of time: w1 = w1(t) w2 =w2 (t) T1 = T1(t) T2 = T2(t) Thus, NF is reduced to 0. 2.2 Energy balance:    = − d ρ ( V T T ) ref − − − − − + ( ) ( ) ( ) C wC T T wC T T UA T T Q p p i ref p ref s a dt Simplifying dT dt dT dt = − − − + VC wC T wC T UA T T Q ρ ( ) p p i p s a = − − − + VC wC T T UA T T Q ρ ( ) ( ) p p i s a b)T increases if Ti increases and vice versa. T decreases if w increases and vice versa if (Ti – T) < 0. In other words, if Q > UAs(T-Ta), the contents are heated, and T >Ti. 2-2

  4. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.3 a) Mass Balances: dh ρ = − − (1) 1 A w w w 1 1 2 3 dt dh ρ = (2) 2 A w 2 2 dt Flow relations: Let P1be the pressure at the bottom of tank 1. Let P2be the pressure at the bottom of tank 2. Let Pabe the ambient pressure. P P w = − ρ g = − Then (3) 1 2 ( ) h h 2 1 2 R g R 2 2 c − ρ P P g = = 1 a w h (4) 3 1 R g R 3 3 c Seven parameters: ρ, A1, A2, g, gc, R2, R3 b) Five variables : h1, h2, w1, w2, w3 Four equations Thus NF = 5 – 4 = 1 1 input = w1 (specified function of time) 4 outputs = h1, h2, w2, w3 2-3

  5. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.4 Assume constant liquid density, ρ . The mass balance for the tank is Ah ρ + ( ) d m g = ρ − ( ) q q i dt Because ρ, A, and mgare constant, this equation becomes dh = i− (1) A q q dt The square-root relationship for flow through the control valve is / 1   2   ρ gh   = + − (2) q C P P v g a g c From the ideal gas law, ( / H ) m M RT g = (3) P g − ( ) A h where T is the absolute temperature of the gas. Equation 1 gives the unsteady-state model upon substitution of q from Eq. 2 and of Pg from Eq. 3: 1/2       ( / ) m M RT h − ρ dh dt gh g g = − + − (4) A q C P i v a ( ) A H c Because the model contains Pa, operation of the system is not independent of Pa. For an open system Pg= Pa and Eq. 2 shows that the system is independent of Pa. 2-4

  6. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.5 a) For linear valve flow characteristics, P w = − − P P 1− P P P 2 f = = 1 d 2 w , , (1) w a b c R R R a b c Mass balances for the surge tanks dm dm = − = − , (2) 1 2 w w w w a b b c dt dt where m1 and m2 are the masses of gas in surge tanks 1 and 2, respectively. If the ideal gas law holds, then m m = = , (3) 2 1 P V RT P V RT 1 1 1 2 2 2 M M where M is the molecular weight of the gas T1 and T2 are the temperatures in the surge tanks. Substituting for m1 and m2 from Eq. 3 into Eq. 2, and noticing that V1, T1, V2, and T2 are constant, V M dP V M dP = − = − and (4) 2 2 1 1 w w w w a b b c RT dt RT dt 2 1 The dynamic model consists of Eqs. 1 and 4. For adiabatic operation, Eq. 3 is replaced by b) γ γ     V V         = = , a constant (5) 1 2 P P C 1 2 m m 1 2 γ γ / 1 / 1     γ γ P V P V         = = 1 C 1 2 2 or and (6) m m 2 1 C Substituting Eq. 6 into Eq. 2 gives, γ / 1   γ V dP 1     − γ γ 1 ( 1 / ) = − 1 1 P w w a b γ C dt 2-5

  7. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ γ / 1   γ V dP 1     − γ γ 1 ( 2 / ) = − 2 2 P w w b c γ C dt as the new dynamic model. If the ideal gas law were not valid, one would use an appropriate equation of state instead of Eq. 3. 2.6 a) Assumptions: 1. Each compartment is perfectly mixed. 2. ρ and C are constant. 3. No heat losses to ambient. Compartment 1: Overall balance (No accumulation of mass): 0 = ρq−ρq1 thus q1 = q (1) Energy balance (No change in volume): dT dt 1 = − − − (2) V C qC T T UA T T ρ ρ ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 2 i Compartment 2: Overall balance: 0 = ρq1−ρq2 thus q2 = q1= q (3) Energy balance: dT dt 2 = − + − − − (4) V C qC T T UA T T U A T T ρ ρ ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 1 2 1 2 2 c c c Eight parameters: ρ, V1, V2, C, U, A, Uc, Ac Five variables: Ti, T1, T2, q, Tc Two equations: (2) and (4) b) 2-6

  8. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ Thus NF = 5 – 2 = 3 2 outputs = T1, T2 3 inputs = Ti, Tc, q (specify as functions of t) c) Three new variables: ci, c1, c2 (concentration of species A). Two new equations: Component material balances on each compartment. c1 and c2 are new outputs. ci must be a known function of time. 2.7 As in Section 2.4.2, there are two equations for this system: 1( ρ dV dt dT dt = − ) w w i w V Q VC ρ ( ) = − + i T T i ρ Results: (a)Since w is determined by hydrostatic forces, we can substitute for this variable in terms of the tank volume as in Section 2.4.5 case 3. 1 i v w C dt A ρ         dV V = − w ρ dT dt Q VC ρ ( ) = − + i T T i V This leaves us with the following: 5 variables: , , 4 parameters: , , 2 equations The degrees of freedom are 5 2 have: 2 output variables: , V T w T Q C ρ , , C A i i , v − = . To make sure the system is specified, we 3 T V 2-7

  9. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ (b)In this part, two controllers have been added to the system. Each controller provides an additional equation. Also, the flow out of the tank is now a manipulated variable being adjusted by the controller. So, we have 4 parameters: , , , sp sp C T V ρ 6 variables: , , , , , i i V T w T Q w 4 equations 2 manipulated variables: , 1 disturbance variable: Q w i iT − = . To specify the two degrees of freedom, we The degrees of freedom are 6 4 set the variables as follows: 2 output variables: , 2 manipulated variables (determined by controller equations): , 2 disturbance variables: , i T w 2 T V Q w i 2.8 Additional assumptions: (i) Density of the liquid, ρ, and density of the coolant, ρJ, are constant. (ii) Specific heat of the liquid, C, and of the coolant, CJ, are constant. Because V is constant, the mass balance for the tank is: dV ρ = − = ; thus q = qF 0 q q F dt Energy balance for tank: dT 8 . 0 VC ρ = ρ − − − (1) ( ) ( ) q C T T Kq A T T F F J J dt Energy balance for the jacket: dT 8 . 0 ρ = ρ − + − (2) J ( ) ( ) V C q C T T Kq A T T J J J J J J i J J J dt where A is the heat transfer area (in ft2)between the process liquid and the coolant. 2-8

  10. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ Eqs.1 and 2 comprise the dynamic model for the system. 2.9 Assume that the feed contains only A and B, and no C. Component balances for A, B, C over the reactor give. dc dt − 1/ E RT A = − − (1) V i Ai q c qc Vk e c 1 A A dc dt − − / / E RT E RT B = − + − (2) ( ) V i Bi q c qc V k e c k e c 1 2 1 2 B A B dc dt − 2/ E RT C = − + (3) V qc Vk e c 2 C B An overall mass balance over the jacket indicates that qc = qci because the volume of coolant in jacket and the density of coolant are constant. Energy balance for the reactor: ( )    = + + d Vc M S Vc M S Vc M S T ( )( A A A B B dt ) ( + −∆ B C C C + − ) i Ai q c M S i Bi q c M S T T A A B B i − − / / E RT E RT UA T − − + −∆ (4) ( ) ( ) T H Vk e c H Vk e c 1 2 1 1 2 2 c A B where MA, MB, MC are molecular weights of A, B, and C, respectively SA, SB, SC are specific heats of A, B, and C. U is the overall heat transfer coefficient A is the surface area of heat transfer Energy balance for the jacket: dT dt c = − + − (5) S V S q T T UA T T ρ ρ ( ) ( ) j j j j j ci ci c c where: ρj, Sj are density and specific heat of the coolant. Vj is the volume of coolant in the jacket. Eqs. 1 - 5 represent the dynamic model for the system. 2-9

  11. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.10 The plots should look as shown below: Notice that the functions are only good for t = 0 to t = 18, at which point the tank is completely drained. The concentration function blows up because the volume function is negative. 2-10

  12. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.11 a) Note that the only conservation equation required to find h is an overall mass balance: ρ ( ) dm dt d Ah dt dh dt (1) = = ρ = + − A w w w 1 2 ρ g v ′ = C h C h Valve equation: w = (2) v g c ρ g v ′ = C C where (3) v g c Substituting the valve equation into the mass balance, 1 A ρ dh = + − ( ) w w C h (4) 1 2 v dt Steady-state model: + − w w C h 0 = (5) 1 2 v + + 2.0 1.2 2.25 3.2 1.5 kg/s m w w 1 2 = = = = 2.13 C b) v 1/2 h c) Feedforward control 2-11

  13. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ Rearrange Eq. 5 to get the feedforward (FF) controller relation, 1 2 w h C w R v − = where 2 . 3 ) 5 . 1 )( 13 . 2 ( w w = − = h = 2.25 m R − w (6) 2 1 1 Note that Eq. 6, for a value of w1= 2.0, gives w2 = 3.2 –1.2 = 2.0 kg/s which is the desired value. = 1 . 1 − 2 . 3 w w If the actual FF controller follows the relation, transmitter 10% higher), turned on, w2= 3.2 –1.1 (2.0) = 3.2 – 2.2 = 1.0 kg/s (instead of the correct value, 1.2 kg/s) Then 0 . 2 13 . 2 = = h h Cv 3 = = h (flow 2 1 w will change as soon as the FF controller is 2 0 . 1 + and h= 1.983 m (instead of 2.25 m) or . 1 408 . 2 13 Error in desired level = 2.25 1.983 − × = 100% 11.9% 2.25 2-12

  14. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ The sensitivity does not look too bad in the sense that a 10% error in flow measurement gives ~12% error in desired level. Before making this conclusion, however, one should check how well the operating FF controller works for a change in w1 (e.g., ∆w1 = 0.4 kg/s). 2.12 a) Model of tank (normal operation): dh dt π = ρ = + − (Below the leak point) A w w w 1 2 3 2 (2) 4 2 = π = 3.14 m A dh = + − = (800)(3.14) 120 100 200 20 dt 20 dh dt = = 0.007962 m/min (800)(3.14) Time to reach leak point (h = 1 m) = 125.6 min. , , w w w b) Model of tank with leak and constant: 1 2 3 dh dt − − = 20 − 20 , h≥ 1 = − d = − 1 h A q h ρ 20 20 ρ(0.025) 1 4 To check for overflow, one can simply find the level hm at which dh/dt = 0. That is the maximum value of level when no overflow occurs. 0 = 20 − 20 1 − m h or hm= 2 m Thus, overflow does not occur for a leak occurring because hm< 2.25 m. 2-13

  15. https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/https://gioumeh.com/product/process-dynamics-and-control-solution/ 2.13 Model of process Overall material balance: dh + − ρ = + − w w C h = (1) AT w w w 1 2 v 1 2 3 dt Component: ( 3) d hx ρ = + − AT w x w x w x 1 1 2 2 3 3 dt dx dh ρ + ρ = + − 3 A h A x w x w x w x 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 T T dt dt Substituting for dh/dt (Eq. 1) dx ρ + + − = + − 3 ( ) AT h x w w w w x w x w x 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 dt dx ρ = − + − 3 ( ) ( ) AT h w x x w x x (2) 1 1 3 2 2 3 dt dx 1 A [ ] ) 3 = − + − 3 ( ) ( w x x w x x or (3) 1 1 3 2 2 ρ dt h T a) At initial steady state , = + = + = 120 100 220 Kg/min w w w 3 1 2 220 = 166 3 . Cv = . 1 75 b) If x1 is suddenly changed from 0.5 to 0.6 without changing flowrates, then level remains constant and Eq.3 can be solved analytically or numerically to find the time to achieve 99% of the x3response. From the material balance, the final value of x3= 0.555. Then, dx dt 1 [ ] = − ) 100(0.5 + − 120(0.6 ) 3 x x 3 3 π (800)(1.75) 2-14

More Related