1 / 75

What have we learned about three-nucleon forces at intermediate energies?

What have we learned about three-nucleon forces at intermediate energies?. Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, RuG Strong interactions: From methods to structures February 14, 2011. Three-body forces and Wikipedia.

swann
Download Presentation

What have we learned about three-nucleon forces at intermediate energies?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What have we learned about three-nucleon forces at intermediate energies? Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki Kernfysisch Versneller Instituut, RuG Strong interactions: From methods to structures February 14, 2011

  2. Three-body forces and Wikipedia A three-body force is a force that does not exist in a system of two objects but appears in a system of three objects (three-body system like in Euler's three-body problem) or more. In physics, an intuitive example of a three-body force is the case of charged, metallic spheres: the charge distribution at the surface of two spheres placed close to each other will be modified, and thus the total force felt by a third sphere cannot be described by the sum of the forces from the two other spheres taken individually. The fundamental strong interaction seems to exhibits such behaviours. In particle physics, the interactions between the three quarks that compose baryons can be described in a diquark model which is equivalent to the hypothesis of a three-body force. There is growing evidence in the field of nuclear physics that three-body forces exist among the nucleons inside atomic nuclei (three-nucleon force). As an analogy, if we identify bodies with human beings and forces with emotions, jealousy is a good example of three-body force: it is not felt as long as only two persons are acting, but it can show up as soon as a third person enters into the scene. Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_force"

  3. Nijmegen I • Nijmegen II • Reid 93 • CD-Bonn • Argonne V18 • … N-N Potentials Modern phenomenological NN potentials: Comparison with experimental np&pp database gives: 2/data ~ 1

  4. “...the replacement of field interactions by two-body action-at-a-distance potentials is a poor approximation in nuclear problems.” Three-Body Forces in Nuclear Physics

  5. Triton Binding Energy

  6. Triton Binding Energy Modern N-N potentials fail to describe triton B.E.

  7. Three-Nucleon Force! (3NF) Phenomenological N-N forces fail to describe A>2 systems! How to resolve? Beyond phenomenological N-N forces

  8. Ab-initio calculations for light nuclei Courtesy S. Pieper, Argonne (+3NF)

  9. Ggggggg p D p p p Three-Body Forces in Nuclear Physics • parametrization of Fuijta-Miyazawa force + 2p rescattering + higher-order interactions • Added to 2N potential as correction • Tucson-Melbourne, Urbana IX, …

  10. Effective-Field Theory Approach • Developed by Weinberg • Coupling of pions and nucleons in EFT • Predicts structure of 3NF • Self-consistent approach • Only works at energies below pion-mass scale

  11. N + d  N + d N + d  N + N + N N + d  3He(3H) + g(*) g(*) + 3He(3H)  N + d g(*) + 3He(3H)  N + N + N Study of Three-Body Forcein Nuclear Physics • Which reactions (and systems) to study? - Electromagnetic interaction on 3B systems - 3B (and more bodies?) Boundstates - 3BElastic scattering in large parts of phase space - 3BBreak-up reaction in different kinematics - Many-body systems  Nuclear matter

  12. ndscattering np scattering Only 2NF Total nd Cross sections • Effect of 3NF small • High-precision mandatory • In addition, look for sensitivity: • exclusive channels • other observables High precision data from Los Alamos W.P. Abfalterer et al., PRL 81, 57 (1998)

  13. Nd elastic scattering cross sections Enlab = 140 MeV H. Witala et al. PRL 81, 1183 (1998) Enlab = 12 MeV 3NF only 2NF only Enlab = 65 MeV Enlab = 200 MeV Total

  14. The Ay puzzle at low energies 5 MeV 7 MeV 9 MeV 2+3NF 2NF 10 MeV 12 MeV 16 MeV 18 MeV 22.7 MeV 28 MeV

  15. The Ay puzzle at low energies L. E. Marcucci et al., Phys. Rev. C80, 034003(2009) 17

  16. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  17. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  18. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  19. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  20. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  21. pd elastic scattering cross sections K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  22. pd elastic scattering cross sections (theory –data)/data K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  23. pd elastic scattering cross sections (theory –data)/data K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  24. pd elastic scattering cross sections (theory –data)/data Hanover Approach of dynamical delta K. Ermisch et al., PRC 68, 054004 (2003), PRC 71, 064004 (2005)

  25. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  26. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  27. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  28. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  29. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  30. p+d vector analyzing powers Bieber et al., PRL84, 606 (2000) Ermisch et al., PRL86, 5862 (2001) PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  31. p+d vector analyzing powers theory-data Ermisch et al., PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  32. p+d vector analyzing powers theory-data Ermisch et al., PRC71, 064004 (2005)

  33. p+d vector analyzing powers theory-data Ermisch et al., PRC71, 064004 (2005) Hanover Approach of dynamical delta

  34. Effect of 3NF as a function of Energy

  35. Effect of 3NF as a function of Energy cm=140º (CDB+C) PRC 78 (2008) 014006 (CDB+C+Δ) Phys. Rev. C78, 014006 (2008) 37

  36. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  37. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  38. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  39. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  40. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  41. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Hanover Approach of dynamical delta Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  42. Spin-Transfer Coefficients Phys. Rev. C75, 041001 (R) (2007)

  43. Break-up channel 5 dimensional phase space (1, 2, E1, E2, 12) i.e. much larger than in the elastic channel () Allows detailed road-map for the study of nuclear forces Requires a setup with large coverage

  44. s2NF+3NF – s2NF Ds = s2NF+3NF Bochum-Cracow Group (2NF=CDB, 3NF=TM’) The break-up channel

  45. The new Polarimeter and the 4 detector

  46. Break-up and the kinematical variable S 48

  47. Break-up channel at 130 MeV Kistryn et al., PLB 641, 23 (2006) S (MeV)

  48. Cross sections for break-up channel for Ep=135 MeV Relativistic effects ! M. Eslami-Kalantari, et al. 50

  49. Analyzing power for break-up channel for Ep=135 MeV M. Eslami-Kalantari, et al. 51

More Related