1 / 9

International Climate Policy – Brief Overview

International Climate Policy – Brief Overview. Mitigation Pollution Markets & Trading Offsets Adaptation Technology Transfer REDD/LULUCF Important Delegations Constituencies. Mitigation. Reducing emissions of greenhouse gas pollution Targets

tabib
Download Presentation

International Climate Policy – Brief Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Climate Policy – Brief Overview • Mitigation • Pollution Markets & Trading • Offsets • Adaptation • Technology Transfer • REDD/LULUCF • Important Delegations • Constituencies

  2. Mitigation • Reducing emissions of greenhouse gas pollution • Targets • IPCC says: 25-40% reductions from 1990 emissions levels by 2020 and 80% 2050 • Gives us 24%-76% chance of not crossing 2 degrees Celsius of average worldwide warming. ~450 ppm carbon dioxide concentration • G8 pledged not to cross 2 degrees • Youth and many others want no more than 1.5 degrees C = ~350 ppm. 2 degrees = no survival for low-lying islands • Youth say: Annex I bears extra responsibility– 45% (from 1990) by 2020 & 95% 2050 • Reality: Actual targets proposed – aggregate 10-24% by 2020 (as of November 2009, includes U.S. legislation) • Too many Annex I not making binding and quantified commitments – waiting for U.S. commitment once domestic legislation resolved

  3. Pollution Markets & Trading • Expected to a way to meet international mitigation requirements • Many already in existence – European Trading Scheme, regional trading pacts in U.S.A., Chicago Climate Exchange • Allowances or limits to pollute are given • Groups (people, companies, countries) exceeding limits either buy allowances from others or pay a big fine • Groups below the limit can sell remaining allowances to others • Reduces cost of pollution reduction – whoever can do it cheapest does it most • Problem – Could be manipulated like anything traded on a market • Secondary markets, derivatives trading could appear • Just like financial crisis – prices could be distorted and groups getting credit for trading allowances that don’t represent real mitigation in the world

  4. Offsets • Meeting mitigation targets without reducing your own emissions • Absorbing GHGs through land use changes (e.g. reforestation) • Paying someone else to reduce their pollution (clean energy generation abroad) • Either can happen somewhere else in your country or another country • Seen in voluntary carbon offsets purchased by companies or people, & mandated ones through domestic or international law • Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) – Way for Annex I to get mitigation credit by reducing pollution abroad instead of doing it at home • Problems (some are issues for non-offset projects, too) • Moral? Shouldn’t countries cut their own pollution? Does it matter as long as we stop climate change? Why not do it as cheaply as possible (money is a resource, too)? • Must be measurable reportable, and verifiable (MRV) or else how do you know they’re really happening? • Additionality – Would the project have happened even if you hadn’t paid for it? • Leakage – Does stopping emissions in one place just move them somewhere else? • Power – Who is in charge of the project? Who decides on what projects? Government, international organization (e.g. World Bank), local community leaders, everyone in the community? Is there corruption? • What about non-climate impacts? Environmental impacts (nuclear in the CDM?), community impacts? Should these matter?

  5. Adaptation • Reducing the harmful effects of existing or expected climate impacts • Moving communities, building sea walls, planting trees to reduce flooding, irrigating to combat drought • Issues: • Prioritzation – Where should we spend our money? • In our own country • To most affected countries worldwide? • Are some places too far gone to be worth rescuing? • Rights and Community Focus (or not) – See offsets issues • Transperency and Participation – See offsets issues • Ecosystem Effects – When does saving people kill other life? • Financing • Need: $400 Billion? • Actual: <$10 Billion • Sources – Funds/Direct contributions, levies on carbon markets

  6. Technology Transfer • The sharing of mitigation and adaptation technologies from countries to other countries • Technology = knowledge and funds to build the technology • Actual transfer of physical capital is uncommon • Usually Annex I to non-Annex I • Collaboration vs. Distribution – Are you giving technology away or partnering on specific technology projects? • Intellection Property Rights (IPR) – Patents – Companies/Government don’t want to give proprietary technology without compensation • Billions of $ in expired clean technology patents already available • Key is getting them into the right hands and ensuring they are in fact expired • Financing – Who will pay for technology transfer – same issues as for adaptation • Joint Implementatin – JI – Projects completed between industrialized countries to earn mitigation credits for the sponsoring country – usually Annex I supporting Eastern European projects • Equity – Who controls which projects are selected and how they’re implemented? See offsets issues

  7. REDD+/LULUCF • Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in developing countries (REDD), and conservation, sustainable forest management, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (+) • Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) • Cheaper way to mitigate, plus deforestation is major pollution source (~20% of worldwide emissions) • Equality/Who’s In Charge/Who Owns What – See Offsets Issues • What’s the goal – Just cutting carbon? Protecting/enhancing biodiversity & avoiding deforestation? Improving forest community livelihoods? • What counts? Intact, natural forests? (Monoculture) Tree Plantations (lower biodiveristy, community resources, and carbon storage)? Harvested wood products (NO biodiversity or community resources, less carbon storage)? • Are we’re sure we’re mitigating as much as we’re giving credit for? - See offsets issues • Who will pay for it?

  8. Important Delegations • Alliance Of Small Island States/Least Developed Countries/Africa Union • Survival at Stake, Pushing Annex I on Targets, Allied with Youth • AU walked out of Barcelona negotiations temporarily • EU • Target Leadership (still weak overall compared to science), Political Will compared to other Annex I • 20% below 1990 by 2020, 30% if rest of Annex I commit. • Scotland – 40% by 2020 • Japan – Financing Architecture, strengthened target this year (still behind science) • Indonesia & Brazil – Pledging to halt deforestation as carbon cut – not binding commitment but significant becuase they’re not required to do anything under Kyoto • Brazil pledged 36%-39% cut by 2020 from business as usual • South Korea – 30% by 2020 from business as usual – not required to do anything • Australia/Canada – Weak Targets • U.S.A. - Key to other Annex I commitments and Non-Annex I agreement, waiting for legislation to pass Senate, plus have to ratify a new treaty (tough....) • Doesn’t want extention of Kyoto because doesn’t think U.S. will ever ratify. Wants new agreement

  9. Constituencies • BINGO – Business and Industry • Youth don’t work with much • Both fossil fuels and clean tech companies • ENGO – Environmental and Development • Organized under Climate Action Network – International (CAN-I) • Work with youth often • TUNGO – Trade Unions – Not much interaction • RINGO – Research and Independent – Not much interaction • LGMA – Local Government – Not much interaction • IPO – Indigenous Peoples - Allies • Farmers – New – Don’t know how we will interact • Women and Gender – New – Will be good allies • YOUNGO – Youth – New – Formally called International Youth Delegation - IYD

More Related