1 / 0

Legal hybridity and Legal history

Legal hybridity and Legal history. Introduction. Legal pluralism Hybridity Patrick Glenn Vernon Palmer Esin Ocornunu Conclusion/debate. Legal pluralism. Classical legal pluralism State legal pluralism Deep legal pluralism New legal pluralism Global legal pluralism. Hybridity.

tadeo
Download Presentation

Legal hybridity and Legal history

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Legal hybridity and Legal history
  2. Introduction Legal pluralism Hybridity Patrick Glenn Vernon Palmer Esin Ocornunu Conclusion/debate
  3. Legal pluralism Classical legal pluralism State legal pluralism Deep legal pluralism New legal pluralism Global legal pluralism
  4. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  5. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  6. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  7. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  8. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  9. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  10. Hybridity Legal pluralism vs Hybridity? 2 completely separate conceptions? OR 2 similar terms that can be used interchangeably? Cultural historian Peter Burke: “hybridity … is a slippery, ambiguous term, at once literal and metaphorical, descriptive and explanatory”
  11. Patrick Glenn Hybrid systems are a recent concept Nationalist, positivist and centralist features gathered over the past two centuries Uniqueness
  12. Patrick Glenn Traditions rather than closed systems 'Normative information with their own criteria for human grouping'
  13. Patrick Glenn Legal and normative hybridity is the rule; unified, national state law is the exception. Nora Demleitner Moulded by a multitude of different qualities overtime and therefore were not simply created as a single entity.
  14. Vernon Palmer American historian with experience in African Law Classical Mixed jurisdictions Myth of pure laws
  15. Esin Örücü Professor of comparative law at the University of Glasgow Mixed and mixing systems: A conceptual search Categorizing legal families
  16. Conclusion
More Related