1 / 29

Management of Postterm Pregnancy

Management of Postterm Pregnancy. Leslie Ablard , MD OB/GYN Mowery Women’s Clinic Salina, KS. Postterm = 42 weeks. Definition: ACOG Bulletin 55, Sept 2004.

tadhg
Download Presentation

Management of Postterm Pregnancy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Management of Postterm Pregnancy Leslie Ablard, MD OB/GYN Mowery Women’s Clinic Salina, KS

  2. Postterm = 42 weeks

  3. Definition:ACOG Bulletin 55, Sept 2004 • Postterm pregnancy refers to pregnancies that extend beyond 42 weeks gestation (294 days, or estimated date of deliver (EDD) +14 days) • Accurate pregnancy dating is critical to the diagnosis • The term “postdates” is poorly defined and should be avoided • Although some cases are a result of the inability to accurate define the EDD, many cases result from a true prolongation of gestation • Reported frequency of postterm pregnancy is 7%

  4. Etiologic factors • Most frequent cause of prolonged gestation • A. Placental Sulfatase deficiency • B. Error in Dating • C. Fetal Anencephaly • Other Associations • Male Sex • Genetic Predisposition • Primiparity • h/o prior postterm pregnancy • When postterm pregnancy truly exists, the most common cause is • Unknown

  5. Assessment of gestational age • Accurate dating is important for minimizing the false diagnosis of postterm pregnancy • MOST RELIABLY AND ACCURATELY DETERMINED EARLY IN PREGNANCY • Questions at new ob visit • When was the first date of your last period? • Do you have regular cycles? • Approx how many days between cycles? • Are you sure about the given date? • Where you on any birth control when you got pregnant? • When did you first find out you were pregnant?

  6. Accuracy of LMP • There are many inaccuracies in even the “surest” of LMPs • Recall • Delayed Ovulation • Irregular cycles • Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. ObstetGynecol.2001 Feb;97(2):189-94. • The last menstrual period (LMP) was considered certain in 13,541 • When ultrasound was used instead of certain LMP, the number of postterm pregnancies decreased from 10.3% to 2.7% (P <.001).

  7. Accuracy of LMP • Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1660-6 • 3655 women with sure LMP • LMP reports prolonged gestation 2.8 days longer on average than ultrasound scanning, yielded substantially more postterm births (12.1% vs 3.4%), and predict delivery among term births less accurately

  8. Ultrasound dating? • When sure LMP and US vary greater than 8% • Approx 7 days up to 20 weeks • 14 days between 20-30 weeks • 21 days beyond 30 weeks

  9. Risks to the fetus • Risk of perinatal mortality (stillbirth and early neonatal deaths) TWICE that of term. • 4-7 deaths vs 2-3 deaths per 1,000 deliveries • Increases SIX fold and higher at 43 weeks • Uteroplacental insufficiency • Meconium aspiration • Intrauterine infection • Postterm pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low umbilical artery pH at delivery and low 5 min APGAR scors • Higher incidence of fetal macrosomia, although no evidence supports inducing labor as a preventative measure in such cases • Prolonged labor, CPD, Shoulder Dystocia

  10. Risks to the fetus • Approx 20% of postterm fetuses have dysmaturity syndrome • Infants with characteristics resembling chronic IUGR from uteroplacentalinsufficiency • Oligo, meconium aspiration, hypogycemia, seizures, respiratory insufficency, non-reassuring fetal testing • Long term sequelae not clear • One large prospective follow up study of children 1-2 yrs, general intelligence, physical milestones, and frequency of intercurrent illnesses were not significantly different between normal infants born at term and those born postterm • Fetuses born postterm are at increased risk of death within the first year- most have no known cause

  11. Risks to the pregnant woman • Increased labor dystocia- 9-12% vs 2-7% • Increased risk in severe perineal injury related to macrosomia- 3.3% vs 2.6% • Doubled rate of c-section----endometritis, hemorrhage, thromboembolic events • ANXIETY

  12. Are there interventions that decrease postterm pregnancy? • Accurate dating by early sono---not current standard of prenatal care in the US • Membrane sweeping studies are conflicting

  13. When should antenatal testing begin? • No studies to state when the best time to start, frequency, or type of testing to use (no one with include an unmonitored control group) • No data that testing adversely affects patients experiencing postterm pregnancy • So, DO IT

  14. Perinatal Mortality • Figure 1. (A) The rates of stillbirth (-▪-) and infant mortality (-) for each week of gestation from 28 to 43+ weeks expressed per 1000 live births. (B) The rates of stillbirth (dark gray) and infant mortality (light gray) in the same population of 171,527 singleton births expressed as a function of 1000 ongoing (undelivered) pregnancies.

  15. What form of Testing? • Options include: NST, BPP, modified BPP (NST with AFI), Contraction Stress Test • No single method superior • Evaluation of AFI important • Definition of oligo in the postterm not been established • No vertical pocked more than 2-3 cm • AFI less than 5 • My choice- starting at 41 weeks- twice weekly monitoring including NST with modified BPP (NST + AFI)

  16. Induce or wait • Management of “low-risk” postterm pregnancy is controversial • Factors to include- gestational age, results of antenatal testing, cervix, maternal preference • Many studies exclude those with favorable cervices

  17. Unfavorable cervix • Small advantage using cervical ripening agents • Several large multicenter randomized studies of management after 40 week report favorable outcomes with routine inductions starting at 41 weeks • Largest study found that routine induction at 41 weeks, found elective induction resulted in lower c-section rates primarily related to fewer c/s for non-reassuirng fetal heart rate tracings • Patient satisfaction was also higher • Meta-analysis of 19 trials found that routine induction after 41 weeks was associated with a lower rate of perinatal mortality and no increase in c/s rate and no effect on operative vag delivery, use of analgesia, or FHRA

  18. Induce at 41 weeks? • Large amounts of evidence suggest that routine induction at 41 weeks gestation has fetal benefit without incurring the additional maternal risks of a higher rate of c-section. • This conclusion has not been universally accepted • Smaller studies report mixed results • Two studies reported an increase in c/s rate among certain subgroups of patients – “high risk”

  19. Prostaglandins for induction • Valuable tool • Several placebo controlled trails have reported significant changes in Bishop scores, duration of labor, lower maximum doses of oxytocin, and reduced incidence of c/s. • No standardized doses have been established • Higher doses (especially PGE1) have been associated with tachysystole and hyperstimulation resulting in non-reassuring fetal status • Lower doses are preferable with PG is used and FHR monitoring should be done routinely before and after placement

  20. VBAC • Do not use prostaglandins • Foley bulb + pitocin • Limited evidence on the efficacy or safety of VBAC after 42 weeks- no firm recommendations can be made

  21. Induction of labor • 41 weeks? • Consistently shown to have no increased morbidity/mortality even with nulliparous patients and unfavorable cervices • 39 weeks? • Multiparous patients appear to have no increase risk of c/s, morbidity, mortality • Do have increased use of resources • Conflicting data on nulliparous • Recent study found no increase risk of c/s with unfavorable cervix after eliminating medical inductions (preeclampsia, diabetes, etc) • Elective Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable CervixObstetrics & Gynecology. 117(3):583-587, March 2011. • May be a baseline risk for c/s un-related to gestational age or cervix

  22. 2447 women underwent c/s from 30 hospitals in LA and Iowa • 25% c/s performed for “failure to progress” at 3 cm or less • 40% of “prolonged 2nd stage” did not meet ACOG criteria (45% nulliparous)

  23. Indications for c/s • -32,443 patients undergoing c/s 2003-2009 • - Obstet &Gynecol 2011

  24. Friedman curve

  25. Zhang’s new labor curve- sept 2010 • 26,838 women in non-augmented, active labor • Multiparous do not enter active labor until 5 cm • Nulliparous do not ener active labor until 6 cm • Labor progresses more slowly than previously described

  26. Give ‘em a chance!! • Friedman was wrong ( or wrong for today) • Labor curve of modern times is slower with the active phase in primips not occurring until 6cm dilated! • Many c-sections performed when not even in active labor • Don’t be afraid of serial inductions • Use all your armamentarium- prostaglandins, foley bulb, pitocin, AROM, FSE, IUPC, operative delivery

  27. summary • Postterm pregnancy may in itself be “high risk” • Establish a EDD early and as precisely as possible- early sono? • Consider antenatal testing at 41 weeks vs induction • An unfavorable cervix may not be as much of a risk factor for c-section as underlying issues- macrosomia, fetal intolerance to labor, etc. • Where is the nadir for fetal well-being and maternal outcomes? 39 weeks? 41 weeks? • Patience is important for today’s labor curve

  28. Postterm Pregnancy is like Popcorn

  29. Thank you

More Related