1 / 13

TGe Consensus Proposal

TGe Consensus Proposal. Amjad Soomro, Javier Del Prado, Saj Shankar, Kirac Challapali Philips. Matthew Sherman AT&T Labs. Bob Meier Cisco. Matthew Shoemake, Sid Schrum Texas Instruments. Katsumi Takaoka, Katsumi Ishi JVC. Isaac Lim, Pek Yew Tan, Yasuo Harada, Panasonic. Authors:.

tamas
Download Presentation

TGe Consensus Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGe Consensus Proposal Amjad Soomro, Javier Del Prado, Saj Shankar, Kirac Challapali Philips Matthew ShermanAT&T Labs Bob MeierCisco Matthew Shoemake, Sid SchrumTexas Instruments Katsumi Takaoka, Katsumi IshiJVC Isaac Lim, Pek Yew Tan, Yasuo Harada,Panasonic Authors: Menzo WentinkIntersil Morihiko HayashiSony Shinya Fukuoka Pioneer Keith Amann, Luke LudemanSpectralink Srinivash Kandela, John Kowalski, Yoshihiro Ohtani, Shugung Xu Sharp Chris Ware, Lizy Paul Motorola Partho MishraAirgo Date: September 12, 2002 Matthew Sherman, et. al

  2. Context • After 2+ years, insufficient support from 802.11 body to finalize TGe standard • Major reasons for lack of consensus • Bifurcation of market requirements • data networking • voice and audio visual • Deeply held beliefs about how QoS should be in implemented in WLAN • Continuous introduction of new concepts with varying levels of maturity • Constant expansion of 802.11 membership • Further delays in 802.11e standard may result in de-facto QoS standard forming outside IEEE Matthew Sherman, et. al

  3. Consensus Proposal Objectives: • Pragmatic QoS standard that addresses key market segments:- data networking- voice - audio visual • Easily accepted by >75% of the IEEE 802.11 body Matthew Sherman, et. al

  4. Status • Ad-hoc group has reached consensus on • eDCF improvements • HCF polling • Addresses needs of rate-based and time-based polling proposals • Power Save extensions • Normative text drafted for these proposals • WME proposal (derived from Doc 02/592r0) • HCF polling-spec (derived from Doc 02/524temp, original fast-track document) • Power Save spec (Doc 02/562r2) • Closure has not been achieved on all issues Matthew Sherman, et. al

  5. Status (cont.) • What’s in • Improved eDCF • HCF Polling • Power Save extensions • Direct Link Protocol (Optional) • Burst Ack (Optional) • What’s out • FEC • AP Mobility • CC/RR Matthew Sherman, et. al

  6. Improved EDCF • Based on WME • EDCF clarification and simplification • 4 queues mandatory at STA and AP • Rules for setting 802.11 user priorities in MAC frames • User priorities for 802.11 management and control frames • Sequence number generation rules • Textual cleanup • Distributed Admission Control • Automatic Power Save Delivery Matthew Sherman, et. al

  7. HCF Polling • Unified Tspec • Addresses needs of rate-based and time-based • Clarified parameter definitions • Application triggered or autonomous Tspec signaling • Added Schedule element • Allows power management by STAs • Normative HCF scheduler behavior • Improves interoperability & testability • Informative description of packet classification Matthew Sherman, et. al

  8. Power Save Extensions • Automatic power save delivery method • STA and AP negotiate a wake-up period • STA wakes up at negotiated period to receive Beacon • AP may deliver 1 or more MSDUs to a STA, without receiving a PS-Poll • STA goes back to sleep when More Data bit is set to 0 or if it receives a Beacon with the TIM bit set to 0 • STA dynamically transition between active and power-save modes • PS-bit in MAC header used to signal transitions • STA can continue to use legacy PS-Poll method Matthew Sherman, et. al

  9. Documents with Normative Text • 524r1temp Matthew Sherman, et. al

  10. Open Issues • MAC SAP definition to support both prioritized and parameterized QoS traffic • Data SAP: Size of user priority tag (3 or 4 bits) • Control SAP: Extensions to support Tspecs • Security for side-channel traffic • AIFS definition • HCF Polling: Mandatory or Optional at AP? Matthew Sherman, et. al

  11. Next Steps to a Ratified TGe • Period to review and modify draft text • Letter-ballot ->Needs to be discussed Matthew Sherman, et. al

  12. Backup Matthew Sherman, et. al

  13. Motions Adopt changes described in IEEE 802.11 02/YYYrN into next TGe draft Matthew Sherman, et. al

More Related