80 likes | 204 Views
WP4 Instantiation WP4 Status 25 September, 2013. WP 4 Objectives. Generic Models Processes Tools. Define a domain-independent procedure for instantiation Take the generic results from WP2 and WP3 Translate them to the industrial domains Enhance with domain-specific extensions
E N D
WP4 Instantiation WP4 Status 25 September, 2013
WP 4 Objectives Generic Models Processes Tools • Define a domain-independent procedure for instantiation • Take the generic results from WP2 and WP3 • Translate them to the industrial domains • Enhance with domain-specific extensions • Prepare guidelines for instantiation to ”other new domains” WP 2WP 3 Domain-specific Models Processes Tools WP4 Company-specific Models Processes Tools Implementation and use WP5
Background of WP 4 Domain-specific Instantiation automotive aerospace railway cross-and-other ARP 4754 DO 178B/C DO 254 ISO 26262 EN 50 126 EN 50 128 EN 50 129 IEC 61508 … Generic results Generic Process Model Component Model, Contracts, V&V CAR CTF & Tools
Guidelines and Process Model • Analyse steps taken in the instantiation process for automotive, aerospace and railway • Particular focus on cross-domain instantiation • Cross-domain defines commonalities and differences between standards as a reference to the „Generic“ part of the GPM • Define commonalities and differences in the domain-specific instantiation • Prepare guidelines for instantiation to new domains • E.g. robotics, industrial automation, healthcare
Instantiation Component Model • Component-based approach • Generic component model comes from WP2.2 • Mapping of properties / attributes / contracts to relevant frameworks in the individual domains • Automotive: EAST-ADL, AUTOSAR , ... • Concepts available cover explicit safety properties, e.g. safety case, safety requirement, safety constraint, error model and hazard. • Aerospace: AADL, lwCCM, ... • Concepts such as performance, schedulability, and reliability can be modeled in thread components. • Application components have properties that specify timing requirements, further constraints can be modeled as component properties • Railway and Cross-Domain: CHESS / VERDE, CESAR, UML/MARTE
Preparation of Instantiation CTF & CAR (for railway) • Tool Framework and artefact repository (M24) • Instantiation of WP3 CTF, CAR and Tools on the basis of the generic process model and/or component model • Utilization of instantiatied process model as a driver for the CTF (pSC: railway only) • Configuration of the tool framework with regards to the instantiation process model • Selection of railway-relevant tools • Demonstrator-specific toolset (e.g. coverage verification?) • Configuration and adaptation of this toolset
Overview of current planning situation: Deliverables • D4.1.1 Review of specific safety requirements and software development practice for the automotive, construction equipment, avionics and railway domains finished M12 • D4.1.2 Modeling and methodology for reusing software in automotive, construction equipment, avionics and railway domains finished M21 • D4.1.3 Methodology integration for reusability of component in the automotive, construction equipment, avionics and railway domains, finished M27 • D4.3.1 Enhancements of the pSafeCer Tools Platform for the railway domain, finished M28 • D4.4.1 Review of specific safety requirements and software development practice and resulting guidelines for tools and methodology integration for reusability of component in other (and new) domainsfinished M25