1 / 25

A National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth

A National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth. Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington, DC. Aligning Transition and SBE: Beyond Square Pegs & Round Holes.

tanith
Download Presentation

A National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A National Leadership Summit on Improving Results for Youth Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington, DC

  2. Aligning Transition and SBE: Beyond Square Pegs & Round Holes Carol A. Kochhar-Bryant & Diane S. Bassett NCSET National Leadership Summit on Improving Results September, 18-19, 2003

  3. Essential Questions 1. How do standards-based education and transition services differ in their assumptions and principles? 2. Why do standards-based education and transition services need to be bridged or aligned?

  4. Essential Questions 3.How can transition planning serve as a unifying framework for achieving alignment? 4.What strategies can we use to achieve this new alignment?

  5. Mental Stretching: • What are the assumptions in both transition and standards-based systems? 2. What differences are there between transition and standards-based systems? 3. What similarities exist between transition and standards-based systems?

  6. A Short History • 1970s: students not in voc.ed; • living at home with parents • 1980s: Research & postschool studies find high unemployment, dependence, social isolation • 1984: OSERS: transition a “federal priority” • 1980s: School-to-Work programs expand

  7. Short History (Cont.) • OSERS 1991 initiative: 5-year system change projects • 2000 Report to Congress: 10 years later, transition initiative not as successful as expected • What happened?

  8. What Happened? What Results? • Unclear results from the system change projects • National progress data: big differences in diploma, NAEP math/reading, SAT • Special education students perform much worse than peers

  9. NCLB Emphasizes Outcomes and Accountability Differences in 8th grade state assessments for students with and without disabilities ranged from: • 23 to 47% in reading • 19 to 42% in math • 25 to 44% in writing (NCEO, 2000)

  10. SO……… IDEA & NCLBAre Getting Acquainted Placed expectations on SEAs and LEAs to align systems to ensure: • Transition planning in the IEP • Access to the (standards-based) general curriculum with accommodations 3. Strengthen interagency coordination to support postsecondary goals

  11. No Child Left Behind 2001 Emphasizes: • Results and accountability • Challenging academic content standards • State assessments • Curriculum standards • High-stakes exams (28 states)

  12. IDEA Emphasizes: • Individualized process for educational programming • Access to the general education curriculum • Transition services • States’ responsibility to align each system

  13. Transition begins early Range of domains including academic. Coordinated activities Individualized planning process/ self-determin. Procedural safeguards Community-based learning Common content standards for all Academic & basic literacy outcomes Student performance can be measured Learning standards will unify understanding of what students should know and do Principles for Transition vs SBE System

  14. 5. Increased standards will: a. decrease number of ‘low-track’ English, Math, and Science classes; b. increase enrollment in college prep. classes; c. eliminate tracking; d. improve options and outcomes for youth. 6. Rigorous learning standards will refocus teaching and learning on common understanding of what schools expect students to know and be able to do. SBE Principles (cont.)

  15. A TRANSITION SYSTEM looks at: Holistic educational outcomes Individualized process Curriculum that matches postschool goals Career-orientation Interagency involvement STANDARDS-BASED SYSTEM looks at: Academic and basic literacy skills Common rigorous learning standards Performance that can be measured validly and reliably through testing So…..to compare……

  16. To achieve high standards appropriate to their abilities and talents To prepare for and to assume their roles as capable citizens Of choice and self-determination To achieve basic literacy and functional skills that can be measured reliably and validly To an individualized approach to their learning and transition to adult life All students have the right….

  17. To academic and vocational standards to improve student outcomes To engage in blended academic and career/vocational opportunities to enhance futures planning Students have a right:

  18. Transition as a Unifying Framework “Transition is not just a program or a project or a set of activities that has a beginning and an end. Rather, it is a vision and a goal for unfolding the fullest potential of each individual and it represents a systematic framework for planning to fulfill that potential.”

  19. What are YOUR suggestions for blending standards into a system anchored by transition?

  20. Blend standards and transition Move beyond standardized tests Integrate transition into school improvement, accountability, and data systems Provide access to relevant assistive technology and telecommunications Use universal design principles to access general education curriculum Strengthen partnerships in the community Document and share successes Do transition because it is right – not for compliance School Districts can:

  21. Educators can: • Understand and be actively involved in standards-based reform • Have high expectations for their students • Know how to use a range of accommodations and alternative measures of performance • See to provide curriculum that is relevant • Embed transition IEPs into a standards-based system

  22. Educators can also: • Include families in planning for students • Be sensitive to the cultural context • Offer alternative means of evaluation • Be actively involved in their own education and planning

  23. Directions for Transition & SBE • GAO Report: Improving outcomes for youth 1. 70% IDEA students--standard diploma or alternative credential (45% for ED/BD) (2001-02) 2. 24% receive vocational services 2. Collection and use of data weak 3. Many impediments to transition (poor linkages with community, transportation, & lack of community work experiences). • Promising sites for innovation in blending transition and SBE

  24. Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction. Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

More Related