1 / 19

Thoughts on Bali (UNFCCC 13 th Session; Kyoto Protocol 3 rd Session)

Thoughts on Bali (UNFCCC 13 th Session; Kyoto Protocol 3 rd Session). National Council for Science and the Environment Washington, DC January 17, 2008. Jonathan Pershing jpershing@wri.org Director, Climate, Energy and Pollution Program World Resources Institute

Download Presentation

Thoughts on Bali (UNFCCC 13 th Session; Kyoto Protocol 3 rd Session)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thoughts on Bali(UNFCCC 13th Session; Kyoto Protocol 3rd Session) National Council for Science and the Environment Washington, DC January 17, 2008 Jonathan Pershing jpershing@wri.org Director, Climate, Energy and Pollution ProgramWorld Resources Institute http://www.wri.org

  2. A little history • Bali: the key issues • A review of the key players • Where to from here?

  3. Going-in Expectations Agreement to negotiate a post-Kyoto arrangement, taking into account national circumstances, new science, historic level of effort, and of course, politics

  4. CO2 Emissions Trends 2005 - 2030 Source: IEA WEO, 2006

  5. Projections of Surface Temperature Source: IPCC, 2007

  6. Coming Out Success – albeit mixed

  7. Bali: The Key Issues • Targets • Technology • Forests • Adaptation • Financing

  8. Targets: The IPCC Source: IPCC AR4

  9. Targets The Politics in Bali • US: emissions still rising; most stringent proposed policies do not meet this target; reject target levels • EU: emissions flat; political proposals in key countries of similar stringency already proposed/adopted; support target • Key developing countries: emissions rising rapidly; domestic policies do constrain growth; not prepared to accept legal obligation to target, but are willing to accept requirement to take action

  10. Technology:A portfolio, at scale, is needed Source: Pacala and Socolow, Science, 2004

  11. ForestsREDD: Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation • Deforestation accounts for approximately 20% of global CO2 emissions • Reducing deforestation (in developing countries) not currently creditable under KP flexibility mechanisms • Two proposals: • PNG (+ rainforest nations): propose to allow credits for reduced deforestation with countries taking concrete commitments to reduce forest emissions • Brazil: countries reducing deforestation receive payments from international fund • COP decision encourages tropical forest countries to undertake demonstration activities; provides “indicative guidance” for such projects. • Primary focus on development of national emission baselines, based on historic emissions, against which reductions can be measured. • Left open: whether incentives to reduce deforestation would take the form of carbon credits or direct financial assistance • REDD issues to be taken up in future deliberations under UNFCCC

  12. Vulnerability and Adaptation Most Impacts Will Be Felt in Developing Countries Source: Ian Noble; World Bank

  13. Financing/Investment Sources: New Energy Finance, UNCTAD Statistics, UNFCCC, and The World Bank

  14. The USA

  15. China • Energy Efficiency : 20% reduction energy per unit GDP by 2010 • Renewable Energy: 10% of TPES by 2010 • Industry: stabilize N2O, increase use of CBM for CH4 reduction • Forestry : increase forest cover 20% above 2005 levels by 2010; sequester 50 million tons carbon • Adaptation: forests, grassland, water use, coastal protection

  16. Europe • The EU aims to commit itself, as part of an international climate protection agreement, to a 30% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 (compared with 1990). • Until a new agreement is concluded, and without prejudice to its position in international negotiations, the EU will reduce its emissions by at least 20% by 2020 (compared with 1990). EU GHG Trends and Projections (1990 = 100) Source: EU Environment Agency

  17. Where to from here?

  18. Future Meetings: BUSY Schedule • UNFCCC: • COP 14 and COP/MOP 4: December 1-12, 2008, Poznan, Poland. • COP 15 and COP/MOP 5: November 30-December 11, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark • First session of the Ad hoc Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the UNFCCC, and 5th session of AWG for further commitments of Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol: March/April 2008, Accra, Ghana • 28th session of UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies: June 2008, Bonn, Germany • G8 (+5): Japan, June 2008 • Major Economies Meeting: January 2008; Honolulu, HI (plus three more sessions, places TBD)

  19. Jonathan Pershing jpershing@wri.org World Resources Institute http://www.wri.org

More Related