1 / 10

Online Delivery of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness

Online Delivery of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness. Student Affairs Committee feasibility study Fall 2010 report to Academic Senate. Project background. Feasibility study: Guiding principles.

tavi
Download Presentation

Online Delivery of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Online Delivery of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Student Affairs Committee feasibility study Fall 2010report to Academic Senate

  2. Project background SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  3. Feasibility study:Guiding principles The SF State online methods of student evaluation of teaching effectiveness feasibility study process: • Rigorous • Transparent • Representative • Needs-oriented • Values-based SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  4. Feasibility study: Process and timeline SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  5. Needs Statement • Study explores the potential of online course evaluation solutions to address issues identified by key stakeholders: • Accessibility for students with disabilities • Parity for fully online classes • Cost effectiveness and improved efficiencies SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  6. Research to date • Literature review • Response rates • Evaluation scores • Student satisfaction • Increased efficiency & cost savings • Environmental scan • 13 of 16 CSU campuses that responded to survey are using or piloting online course evaluations • Non-CSU campuses (e.g., Yale, Marquette) provided valuable information SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  7. Feasibility study pilot:Draft design & methodology SF State will investigate variables as they relate 21st Century student and faculty populations @ SF State • Spring 2011 pilot with one SF State department • Sufficient faculty volunteers • Multiple course types • Varying enrollment sizes • Multiple course class levels • Multiple student levels SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  8. Frequently Asked Questions Some questions will be answered through the study, while others can be answered with a FAQ site. Example of questions answered by study • Do response rates differ based on delivery method (paper or online)? Example of questions answered by FAQ • What can we learn about online course evaluations from other campuses? SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  9. Special Thanks • Student Affairs Committee of 2009/10 and 2010/2011 • Faculty Affairs Committee of 2009/10 • Academic Technology • Faculty Affairs • Human Resources • California Faculty’s Association • California State Employees Union • Executive Technology Board • Educational Technology Advisory Committee • Campus Technology Committee SAC presentation to Academic Senate

  10. Online delivery of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness • Thank you!!! • Questions and Discussion • For more information, email birdem@sfsu.edu SAC presentation to Academic Senate

More Related