1 / 17

Perspectives on Corporate Finance Research

Perspectives on Corporate Finance Research . Ronald Masulis Vanderbilt University FMA PhD Seminar 2007. Research Trends (1). More corporate governance research is coming! Optimal board structure Deeper understanding of CEO employment contracts and compensation

tavia
Download Presentation

Perspectives on Corporate Finance Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives on Corporate Finance Research Ronald Masulis Vanderbilt University FMA PhD Seminar 2007

  2. Research Trends (1) • More corporate governance research is coming! • Optimal board structure • Deeper understanding of CEO employment contracts and compensation • Focus on relationships among various governance mechanisms • More cross country and non-US company analysis • Analysis of the relations between corporations and government officials and organizations • New analysis of the influence of corporations on the passage of laws and regulations • Relationships between corporations and financial institutions, especially banks and other institutions that are major creditors or equity holders • Greater integration of law & economics with corporate finance – Law Matters!

  3. Research Trends (2) • Corporate bonds will gain greater visibility – new databases are available • Bond returns and bond covenants are likely to garner much more attention • More bond return event studies • Relation between bond prices and stock prices and risk arbitrage • Corporate bond offerings and flotation costs • Security choice decisions are going to be explored more deeply • Development of better solutions to selection bias and endogeneity issues • Journals are going to continue to demand more auxiliary evidence to distinguish among hypotheses that have the same qualitative implications

  4. Basic Research Recommendations • Know the relevant institutional details intimately • Read extensively on legal, economic, accounting implications of your research topic • Talk to practitioners about your hypotheses • Understand the economic incentives of all the participants • Are you sure that you are studying only one economic process? • Know the major theories and evidence in the existing literature • Survey papers are often helpful • Make your own summaries of important papers • Look for conflicting theoretical predictions • Know the strengths and weaknesses of datasets you are using • Are you using the most accurate and complete dataset available? • Cross check random samples of this dataset against original sources - if unsure • Have you checked the outliers for accuracy? • Outliers can warn you that something is missing in your statistical model • What are the distributional properties of the key variables you are using? • Do your datasets allow you to ask important question not previously analyzed?

  5. Be a Sophisticated User of Statistics • The more statistical techniques you know, the more tools you have available in your research toolbox • Know their strengths and weaknesses well! • Know the underlying distributional assumptions • Know the setting where they have been used before • Know the setting where their use has been criticized • Be able to pick the best statistical method for the problem at hand • Don’t just replicate what is already being done • Innovate by using an approach not used in the literature before, but one that has advantages over the existing approaches • Keep watch for new developments • Watch for the introduction of new techniques in the top journals • Read up on the newest econometrics texts

  6. Experimental Design & Robustness • How effective is the experimental or statistical design of your study? • Differences in differences approach can be more powerful than many other methods • Can you bring auxiliary evidence to bear to differentiate theories that have the same predictions? • Have you checked your results for reliability using robust techniques? • Adding and dropping control variables • Alternative definitions of dependent variables & key explanatory variables • Non-linear specifications • Median regressions • Winsorizing the data • Trimming extreme outliers • Converting quantitative variables into • Indicator variables • Focusing on top and bottom halves, quartiles or quintiles • Have you worried about selection bias in the data and endogeneity of key explanatory variables?

  7. Looking for Empirical Research Topics • Try to articulate your tentative hypothesis very precisely • Is it really an economically important question to the field? • Does it advance our understanding of economic processes? • Is your study going to be interesting regardless of what you find? • How general can your conclusions be? • How generally applicable are your research methods going to be? • New research opportunities • New capital markets • New securities and financial claims • New databases (e.g. corporate and municipal bond prices) • New hypothesis or economic theories • New laws or regulations (A useful new experiment?) • New statistical techniques • Combining several databases (matching across databases can be costly) • Existing studies are seriously flawed and you have a new approach? • Consider starting with a pilot study – test for feasibility and potential problems with your planned approach

  8. Finding a Good Topic • Bridging related fields can offer many of benefits • Cross fertilization and transfers of technologies across fields • It can give you new perspectives on a problem • New theories and statistical methods developed in related fields can often be profitably adopted • Macroeconomics and asset pricing theory • Macroeconomics and corporate investment & financing decisions • Financial accounting and market efficiency • Political science and corporate finance • Industrial organization and corporate investment decisions • Law & economics and corporate governance • Econometrics and asset pricing theory • Look for major theories with conflicting predictions • Look for clean experiments where most confounding issues are held constant

  9. Be Entrepreneurial • Look for new datasets • Cultivate practitioners for access to proprietary data – it may take a long time to gain their confidence • Look for datasets that have not been used before • Build your own datasets • Consider combining a number of unrelated datasets • What economically important questions have not been adequately studied? • Is there are large, growing financial market that has not been studied? • Do prior empirical studies find contradictory results? • What might be the reasons? Bad economic model, statistical problem, poor data? • Constantly try to learn more about the institutional details in the fields you are researching • Take advantage of opportunities to talk to practitioners & regulators • Continually learn more about the databases you have access to • What are the full set of variables in the dataset? • How complete are the data fields? • How reliable are the various variables in the dataset?

  10. Take a Multidimensional Focus • Look at a problem from the perspective of each significant player in the problem • For example: • CEO and senior management • Board of directors (inside, outside, independent, gray) • Stockholders (individual, corporate, institutional – ST or LT) • Founders (director, CEO, family member, blockholder) • Blockholders (corporate, individual, institutional) • Creditors (senior, junior, secured, unsecured) • Customers (monopoly, oligopoly, competitive markets) • Supplier (specialized firm specific products, general goods) • Consider the incentives of supporting players • Financial Institutions • Information producers • Regulators

  11. Finding Interesting Theoretical Topics • What’s wrong with existing theories? • Which predictions are supported? • Which predictions are rejected? • Can several specific theories be capture in a more general theory? • How reasonable are the assumptions when measured against practice? • Can a more realistic assumption be incorporated into an existing model? • Is it likely to change the model’s properties? • How sensitive are the predictions of major theoretical models to their assumptions? • Are there some major innovations in basic economic theory that could be applied to your area of research?

  12. Importance of a Good Introduction • Researchers put more effort into an article’s introduction than into almost anything else. • You need to be able to motivate very busy people to read your research! • What are the key issues you are addressing? • Why is it economically important? • What are your new contributions? • What are your significant new findings? • What are the economic magnitudes of your key findings? • What are the important economic implications of your evidence? • What is learned about important institutional details and typical patterns found in the economic phenomenon being studied • Use active verbs • What can readers learn that can improve their own research?

  13. Become a Better Writer • An important part of being a successful researcher is to write in a clear, careful and concise manner. • If your paper is poorly written or organized, a referee is immediately disposed to reject your paper. • Turgid writing obscures your findings and will undercut your impact. • Marketing matters – excite people about reading your paper – if they don’t read it – then they are unlikely to ever cite it. • Keep a collection of well written papers to inspire and guide you. • Good writers tend to read good literature on a consistent basis.

  14. Benefits of Co-authorship • Can increase speed to completion • Potentially more time, energy, budget and insights • Exploit comparative advantages in • Knowledge of the data • Knowledge of institutional detail and economic literature • Knowledge of needed statistical techniques • Learn more quickly how to be a better researcher or successful author • Advantages of co-authoring with experienced researchers in your early years • Know how to write persuasively and professionally • Know how to respond to a referee’s report • Better chance to present in conferences • Potentially better access to practitioners • Knows the political landscape

  15. Be a Diplomat! • Your lifetime job is to improve on the existing literature. • There is always a positive way of highlighting your contribution, while at the same time indicating the weaknesses in prior work – watch how it is done in the articles you read. • But be diplomatic – the person you criticize could be your referee, the person who evaluates your next conference submission or maybe your next dean. • You are likely to keep seeing these same researchers for the rest of your career – so why make an enemy when you don’t need to? • Some journals have an implicit policy of not publishing papers that directly undercut their well cited articles. • You are not always going to be right – this profession is one that is based on constant learning and improvement. • Once you start publishing – you will be grateful if future researchers are gentle in highlighting the weaknesses of your prior work. • Remember a better approach is just around the corner – even for your best work.

  16. What’s the Real Publication Standard? • You need to recognize that when a paper that came before yours was first conceived, the state of the arts was much less advanced. • Thus, you are likely to underestimate the insights that the paper had to offer to the field when it was accepted for publication. • This can give you a false sense of how easy it is to publish papers in top tier outlets. • It is not easy to publish in the top journals - for almost everyone – it takes determination and continued humility to learn from your mistakes.

  17. Don’t Over Reach! • Many research papers interpret their evidence to be much stronger than it really is. • Many studies draw stronger conclusions than are really supported by their evidence • This over reaching can seriously undercut your credibility with careful readers and your referee • Be very careful about drawing policy implications from your work • Since most studies are based on limited samples and a historic period – this makes generalizing conclusions to an entire population hazardous and unjustifiably heroic

More Related