1 / 18

Six Sigma [Green Belt Project]

Six Sigma [Green Belt Project]. Continuous Quality Improvement Purchasing Justification Process. EMT-P Jason Ausman FTO Jim Bonham LT. Michael Hamel EMT Robert Hofstetter EMT-P Angela Holbrook. Team:. Sponsor:. Chief Chris Hansen. Facilitators:. DC Kim Dickerson Capt. Art Garcia.

teresej
Download Presentation

Six Sigma [Green Belt Project]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Six Sigma[Green BeltProject] Continuous Quality Improvement Purchasing Justification Process EMT-P Jason Ausman FTO Jim Bonham LT. Michael Hamel EMT Robert Hofstetter EMT-P Angela Holbrook Team: Sponsor: Chief Chris Hansen Facilitators: DC Kim Dickerson Capt. Art Garcia

  2. Problem Statement The current CQI process is inconsistent with new product evaluation, justification, implementation, and validation.

  3. Business Case • Develop a process that involves research justification of a demonstrated need for new equipment. The process will include timely training as well as periodic evaluation and validation. • Alignment to Business Strategy • BoCC FY 2007 Goals

  4. Business Case Goal 2 Make Lee County Government the benchmark county in Florida for innovation and excellence in customer service and technological operations. Objective 1 – Continue assessment of organizational practices through continuous improvement techniques.

  5. Business Case Goal 4 Answer: “What is the business of Lee County Government?” by identifying and defining, periodically evaluating, and maintaining, core levels of services that can be shared and understood by the public. Objective 2 – Early on in the annual budget development process, identify – through a fact based analysis – a target percentage for operational increases for the coming fiscal year that will be communicated, as a goal, to county departments an Constitutional Officers. Objective 6 – Continue fiscal solvency by monitoring, evaluating and maintaining core services. Assure a full and complete evaluation of any changes in levels of core services, including budgetary impacts.

  6. Define Phase • Previous ExpendituresCCEMT-P course • $30,000 budgeted • Actual expense closer to $300,000 • 11/05    5 Students CCEMT-P Pittsburg, PA                                     $18,830.20 • 1/06     5 Students CCEMT-P Augusta, GA        $15,320.75 • 4/06      2 Students CCEMT-P Augusta, GA         $  7122.48 •                    Total                $41,273.43

  7. Define Phase • Previous Expenditures • Narcotic Bags- 8/2005 • 50 Narc.Personal/Safe Boxes (Koons Locksmiths) @ $11.95 ea    $597.50   • No provision for cost to continue program • No implementation evaluation/validation

  8. Define Phase • Previous Expenditures • Ambulance Cameras • 40 Kodak Easy Share C310 • Digital Zoom Camera $87.00 Each     $3,480.00 • 40 Kingston Flash Memory Card-128MB-SD       $14.50 Each           580.00                                   Total                 $4,060.00 • No provision for cost to continue program • No implementation evaluation /validation

  9. Preliminary Goal To develop a process that results in enhanced patient care, demonstrates fiscal need and provides for long term sustainability. Result = risk avoidance

  10. The Project Scope • Request made to purchase the Auto Pulse • Do we really need it? • How will it make a difference? • Is it financially achievable and sustainable? • Periodic evaluation and validation.

  11. Previous Expenditures • Cameras: • Mandate – No • Patient care/employee driven – Trauma Services request • Immediate implementation required – No • Evidence based – questionable • Non-evidence based – Trauma Services opinion • Refer to CQI committee – no • Financial resources available – non-budgeted item • Other financial resources – July spending • Recurring resources accounted for - no • Training/Educational resources – minimal • Can we get what we need in a timely manner – yes • Acceptable overall risk - yes • Purchase - yes

  12. Previous Expenditures • Narcotic Bags: • Mandate – No • Patient care/employee driven – Pine Island and Alva deployment • Immediate implementation required – Yes • Evidence based – questionable • Non-evidence based – Opinion generated • Refer to CQI committee – no • Financial resources available – non-budgeted item • Other financial resources – July spending • Recurring resources accounted for - no • Training/Educational resources – minimal (non-budgeted) • Can we get what we need in a timely manner – yes • Acceptable overall risk – yes (questionable at this time) • Purchase - yes

  13. Previous Expenditures • CCEMT-P course: • Mandate – No • Patient care/employee driven – Pediatric Services request (LMH) • Immediate implementation required – No • Evidence based – questionable • Non-evidence based – Pediatric Services opinion • Refer to CQI committee – no • Financial resources available – $30,000.00 budgeted • Other financial resources – none • Recurring resources accounted for - no • Training/Educational resources – not accounted for • Can we get what we need in a timely manner – yes • Acceptable overall risk - yes • Purchase - yes

  14. Measure Phase Auto Pulse • $15,000 per unit • $750,000 for 50 ambulances • $125 per chest strap • $7 bio-shield • 526 cardiac arrests in 2006 • $69,432 disposable cost

  15. Conclusion • Define Project Implementation: March 1, 2007 • Measure Project Completion after 25 Cardiac Arrests • Analyze Analyze data collected against current process of manual CPR during the same time frame • Improve Determine justified need for purchase • Control Project referred to Continuous Quality Assurance/ Improvement Committee Design By: FTO Dominick C. Watts, NREMT-P, FP-C

More Related